Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FOR
BANKING COMPANIES
A Very apt topic, given that the worst financial storm since the
1930s is only gradually calming down.
Banks have taken centre stage in the ongoing financial and economic
crisis.
First, banks provide the public with liquidity (money) and payment
services through their deposit-taking business.
(b) acting as agents for any Government or local authority or any other person or
persons; the carrying on of agency business of any description including the
clearing and forwarding of goods, giving of receipts and discharges and otherwise
acting as an attorney on behalf of customers, but excluding the business of a
managing agent or secretary and treasurer of a company;
(c) contracting for public and private loans and negotiating and issuing the same;
(f) managing, selling and realising any property which may come into the
possession of the company in satisfaction or part satisfaction of any of its
claims;
(g) acquiring and holding and generally dealing with any property or any
right, title or interest in any such property which may form the security or part
of the security for any loans or advances or which may be connected with any
such security;
(2) No banking company shall engage in any form of business other than those
referred to in sub-section (1).
Explanation. — For the purposes of this section, "goods" mean every kind of
movable property, other than actionable claims, stocks, shares, money, bullion
and specie, and all instruments referred to in clause (a) of sub-section (L) of
section 6.
Provided that the banking company may, within the period of seven years as
aforesaid deal or trade in any such property for the purpose of facilitating the
disposal thereof:
Provided further that the Reserve Bank may in any particular case extend the
aforesaid period of seven years by such period not exceeding five years where it
is satisfied that such extension would be in the interests of the depositors of the
banking company.
The prohibition in dealing with goods (except for collateral purposes) has
been interpreted as a ban on banks to trade in commodity derivatives.
The amendments now permit stock brokers as also banks and other entities
(that were hitherto restricted by their respective statutes) to trade in commodity
futures.
Further, to allow banks and other entities, the notification indicates Section 8 of
the BRA, 1949 also has been amended to permit banks under the second
schedule of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, and other entities, like the
Export Import (EXIM) Bank of India, National Bank for Agriculture and Rural
Development (NABARD) and the National Housing Bank (NHB), to trade in
commodity futures.
The case for allowing banks’ entry into commodity futures trading had been
argued not only to boost liquidity and turnover volumes, but also to provide them
with a protective cover against default on agricultural loans. In the new
arrangement, banks would lend to farmers or cooperatives and simultaneously
encourage them to sell into futures contracts. This would help reduce the risk of
farmers defaulting on their loans in the event of a fall in spot commodity prices.
Section 9 of the BRA Act, which deals with disposal of non-banking assets,
says that no banking company can hold any immovable property, howsoever
acquired, except such as is required for its own use for any period exceeding
seven years from the acquisition thereof or from the commencement of this Act,
whichever is later.
After an amendment in 2002 however, banks can now afford to wait it out to
dispose off the seized immovable assets like land, building and plant &
machinery at the right price. The seven year disposal clause can lead to distress
sale of the seized assets.
The SARFAESI Act provides for the enforcement of security interest for
realisation of dues without the intervention of courts or tribunals. The Act
provides for the sale of financial assets by banks and financial institutions to
securitisation and reconstruction companies. Under this Act, banks and
institutions can seize the assets of any defaulter after serving a 60-day notice
period, and sell the assets to recover the dues. If a defaulter wants to file an
appeal at a DRT (Debt Recovery Tribunal) against the lender's move, under
Section 17 (2) of the Act, it needs to deposit 75 per cent of the claim by the
lenders with the DRT.
But after the ruling in the MARDIA Chemicals Vs ICICI Bank, the deposit
clause of 75 per cent has been struck down: the court held that Section 17 (2) of
the Act was blocking the ability to take legal recourse against seizure notices.
SHAHEED SUKHDEV COLLEGE OF BUSINESS STUDIES
(UNIVERSITY OF DELHI)
CONCLUSION
The regulations set out in Section 8 and Section 9 of the Banking
Regulation Act, 1949 are not meant to cripple the banks’ hands; but
indeed to promote healthy banking practices. We see from this paper, that
though the banking industry started out more on the conservative side
with strict regulations, these restrictions have been more or less loosened
with the gradual maturing of the Indian Banking Industry.
In view of the above research, we must say that this paper indeed has led
to value-addition for the team. Also, we have explored the term:
“Business prohibited for banking companies” in quite a disective light-
bringing before us some of the bare fundamentals of the banking
regulations framework.
Presented By:
Rohitashwa Aggarwal (15919)
Pritom Das (15920)
Preetika Gupta (15930)
Sarthak Ahuja (15932)
SHAHEED SUKHDEV COLLEGE OF BUSINESS STUDIES
(UNIVERSITY OF DELHI)