Case 1:10-cv-00151-RCL Document 17 Filed 03/25/10 Page 1 of 10

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, STE 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
Tel: (949) 683-5411; Fax (949) 766-7603
E-Mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE §

Plaintiff, §
§
v. §Civil Action: 10151RCL
§
§
Barack Hussein Obama, § MOTION TO THE
§ JUDICIAL PANEL ON
Defendant. § MULTIDISTRICT
§ LITIGATION
§ 28 USC § 1407(c)(ii)

Pursuant to 28 USC §1407(c)(ii) Plaintiff Orly Taitz moves for the Multi
District Judicial Panel to coordinate and consolidate this action with Florida
et al. v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al.,
United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Pensacola
Division, Case No. 3-10-cv-91 and motions for both actions to be heard
jointly by the Honorable Royce Lamberth in the US District Court for the
District of Columbia.
These cases involve the following issues of common facts:
On Tuesday, March 23 Mr. Barack Hussein Obama signed into law H.R.
3590. This Unprecedented act of encroachment on constitutional liberties of
US citizens and individual States by the Federal government is being

Taitz v Obama Motion to Multidistrict Judicial Panel to consolidate 10-

cv-151 DC with 3:10-cv_91 FLND 1
 Case 1:10-cv-00151-RCL Document 17 Filed 03/25/10 Page 2 of 10

challenged in the Northern District of Florida, Pensacola division by thirteen

state Attorney Generals, who filed their complaint the same day, on March
23, 2010. The same act is being challenged by the undersigned, Dr. Orly
Taitz, ESQ, who is suing pro se Mr. Obama in regards to damages suffered
by her, and who included a challenge to the above bill as part of her First
Amended Complaint, which was filed by her in the District of Columbia on
March 19, 2010 when the passing of the bill was imminent.
H.R. 3590 was signed into law by Mr. Barack Hussein Obama, who
amazingly does not possess a valid U.S. Social Security number, which
every legal citizen of the US is supposed to possess, never proved his
legitimacy to the presidency. Therefore the act is invalid, as it was not
signed by one legally entitled to sign it.
Attached is Exhibit 1, Affidavit from a retired Deportation Officer
with the Department of Homeland Security and licensed investigator Mr.
John Sampson, stating that the Social Security number used by Mr. Obama
most of his life 042-68-4425, cannot be a lawfully obtained number, as 042
are the initial digits assigned to the state of CT, while Mr. Obama was never
a resident of CT.
Exhibit 2, is an affidavit from a private investigator, licensed with the
Department of Homeland Security, Susan Daniels. It concurs that for most
of his life Mr. Obama has used number 042-68-4425, which cannot be
lawfully his, as indeed it was obtained in CT, when Mr. Obama resided in
HI. Moreover, Ms. Daniels research shows that this is a number that was
issued to an individual born in 1890, and Mr. Obama assumed this number

Taitz v Obama Motion to Multidistrict Judicial Panel to consolidate 10-

cv-151 DC with 3:10-cv_91 FLND 2
 Case 1:10-cv-00151-RCL Document 17 Filed 03/25/10 Page 3 of 10

unlawfully. Ms. Daniels provides a list of 8 more Social Security numbers

used by Mr. Obama, as well as several numbers used by Michele Obama.
Exhibit 3 is an affidavit from a licensed investigator and retired
Scotland Yard elite anti organized crime officer Mr. Neil Sankey, who has
compiled from the most reputable National databases: Lexis Nexis and
Choice Point a list of multiple addresses under the names of Barack Obama
and Barry Obama, those addresses are connected to 39 different social
security numbers, none of which were issued in the state of HI.
Exhibit four is an affidavit from a licensed document expert Sandra
Ramsey Lines, which states that the short version (abbreviated) COLB-
Certification of Live Birth of Barrack Hussein Obama cannot be viewed as
genuine without examining the original, currently sealed in the Health
Department in HI, which Mr. Obama refuses to unseal in spite of over 60
Federal and multiple State actions brought by citizens, State Representatives
and highly ranked members of the military from around the nation. None of
the above actions were heard on the merits, but rather were dismissed on
technical procedural grounds, such as standing and jurisdiction. All of the
above facts cast a doubt as to the legitimacy of Mr. Obama to serve as a
President due to his lack of qualification as a Natural Born citizen per
Article 2, section 1, §5, making him ineligible to sign H.R.3590.
Additionally, Dr. Taitz has brought a Quo Warranto action, as
specified in District of Columbia statutes §16-3501- §16-3503, which allows
Quo Warranto action against a federal officer within the jurisdiction of the
District of Columbia. As Florida does not provide such jurisdiction, it
appears to be imperative to join two causes of action in the District of

Taitz v Obama Motion to Multidistrict Judicial Panel to consolidate 10-

cv-151 DC with 3:10-cv_91 FLND 3
 Case 1:10-cv-00151-RCL Document 17 Filed 03/25/10 Page 4 of 10

Columbia, where it is already being heard by Chief Judge of the US District

Court for the District of Columbia Honorable Judge Royce C. Lamberth.
There has to be a Quo Warranto determination, regardless to Mr. Obama’s
place of birth, whether he is eligible to serve as US President and
Commander in Chief, as he had since birth split allegiance citizenship of
multiple countries: Great Britain, Kenya and Indonesia. Such Quo Warranto
action will nullify H.R. 3590, as it would be deemed signed by an ineligible
party and it would dispense both causes of action.
Current Health Care Bill H.R. 3590 represents a Tortuous
Interference with Existing Contracts. As millions of citizens have worked
and contributed into the Medicaid program, relying upon the promise by the
US Government and Congress, that this money will be in safe keeping when
needed as doctors such as Dr. Taitz have spent years in training and invested
in their practices, relying upon the promise that such programs will exist for
years and they will be paid reasonable fees for their services, and as the
individual States have spent billions of dollars in building an infrastructure
to service Medicaid programs. Currently, the Pelosi-Reid lead majority in
Congress and Obama administration are simply stealing from the Medicaid
program billions and trillions of dollars and interfering with the existing
contracts without any Constitutional right to do so. While the Obama
administration hails this bill as a great gift to the Nation, in reality neither
Obama administration, nor the Pelosi-Reid Congress are giving anything,
they are simply stealing from the existing programs, that are on the verge of
bankruptcy as it is.

Taitz v Obama Motion to Multidistrict Judicial Panel to consolidate 10-

cv-151 DC with 3:10-cv_91 FLND 4
 Case 1:10-cv-00151-RCL Document 17 Filed 03/25/10 Page 5 of 10

H.R.3590 represents a Breach of Contract. Every governmental

program and entitlement program represents a contract with the American
people. As the public and the states contribute into the program, such funds
are supposed to be kept safe and prudently invested. Today it is quite clear
that the funds have been mismanaged, misappropriated or embezzled, as
currently there is a 45 trillion dollars debt in unfunded liabilities in Social
Security and an additional 57 trillion dollars in unfunded liabilities in
Medicaid. The US government and Congress have breached their
obligations to the citizens, like Dr. Taitz and to the States. Taking
billions and trillions of dollars from the programs that are already in deep
debt and overburdened, is more than just the breach of an obligation, it is
reckless and it is a breach of Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing.
This breach represents nothing but an enormous Criminal Ponzi scheme,
which rests on a pyramid of prior Ponzi schemes.
H.R. 3590 represents an Unenforceable Illusory Contract. Today
the US government and US Congress are facing a 13.5 trillion dollars of
foreign debt on top of 102 trillion dollars of unfunded liabilities described
previously, for a total of 115.5 trillion dollars of total debt and
obligations with the Obama administration running over 1.5 trillion dollars
of unprecedented yearly deficit which is expected to double our foreign debt
in the near future. When the overburdened US government signs such an
enormous program of entitlement without any reasonable means to sustain it,
it creates and Unenforceable Illusory contract.
H.R. 3590 represents a violation of the Commerce Clause. While the
government has a right to provide some regulation of commerce, it is not

Taitz v Obama Motion to Multidistrict Judicial Panel to consolidate 10-

cv-151 DC with 3:10-cv_91 FLND 5
 Case 1:10-cv-00151-RCL Document 17 Filed 03/25/10 Page 6 of 10

allowed to overburden Interstate Commerce and interfere with existing

commercial relations. Today Dr. Taitz, as a doctor, is providing treatment
to patients, some of them chose not to pay thousands of dollars for
insurance, but rather pay Taitz for their care directly. Under H.R. 3590 those
patients will be forced by the government to purchase a product or be
penalized by the government. How is this different from the mafia
bosses ruffling up business owners choosing not to buy the “insurance”
of their protection? While Taitz is aware that Obama was groomed in
Chicago, the birthplace of such activities, the United States of America as a
whole is not Chicago. The US Constitution gives the Federal government
very limited powers, such as National Defense, Border patrol and coinage.
Based upon the recent history, the federal government has failed in all of the
above, and as such it is time for the federal courts to intervene and curb this
insane unprecedented expansion and limit the Federal government to
the functions that they are mandated to perform, but have failed to
perform so miserably. This is the same red line in both the pleadings by
Taitz and State of Florida v Department of Health.
Dr. Taitz has a contractual relationship with her patients. This
contractual relationship is based on the premise that they are gainfully
employed in their occupations, not overburdened by taxes and are able to
pay for such services. In recent years, roughly starting from the Clinton
administration, the US government and Congress seemed to favor campaign
contributions and lobbying positions for their family members coming from
the multinational corporations, more so than the wellbeing of their
countrymen, as the Federal Government and Congress have largely

Taitz v Obama Motion to Multidistrict Judicial Panel to consolidate 10-

cv-151 DC with 3:10-cv_91 FLND 6
 Case 1:10-cv-00151-RCL Document 17 Filed 03/25/10 Page 7 of 10

dismantled the whole system of tariffs, which protected American jobs and
accounted for the difference in the cost of living in the US versus third
World countries, like China, India and Philippines, which are using nearly
slave labor. As a result American workers have lost their jobs by the
millions, became unable to pay their mortgages,lost their homes by the
millions and became destitute by the millions. As the federal and the state
governments saw their revenues from income taxes dwindle, they came up
with more tax schemes to make up for the deficit in the ever increasing
budget. As a result the citizens of this nation found themselves in a vise,
between a rock and a hard place, unable to pay for medical services provided
by Dr. Taitz or other doctors or anybody else for that matter. H.R. 3590
represents the last straw in the Interference with the existing contracts
between Dr. Taitz and her patients and similarly existing contracts of
the states. Tax penalty for refusal to buy insurance represents unlawful
capitation or direct tax in violation of Article1, Sections 2 and 9 of the
Constitution of the United States.
While the individual states are asserting their rights as Sovereigns
under the 10th amendment, Dr. Taitz is asserting her right as a Sovereign
under the 9th amendment in the same claim that H.R. 3590 violates both 9th
and 10th amendments, violates the mandate given to the federal
government by the sovereign free citizens and sovereign States, that the
federal government is overreaching and infringing upon such rights.
The penalty on citizens under H.R. 3590 is abusive, as it does not
punish any illegal behavior, but simply penalizes citizens for living and
breathing. This penalty will be increasing in future years, and it represents a

Taitz v Obama Motion to Multidistrict Judicial Panel to consolidate 10-

cv-151 DC with 3:10-cv_91 FLND 7
 Case 1:10-cv-00151-RCL Document 17 Filed 03/25/10 Page 8 of 10

slippery slope as a precedent, whereby the Federal government will be

allowed to penalize citizens for anything without any Constitutional mandate
to do so. What if tomorrow the Federal government decides that for the
common good and to reduce 115 trillion dollars total debt and obligations
incurred by the Federal government, everyone will be required to participate
in hard labor work projects and do those for free, and refusal to do so will be
penalized? How is it called? Slavery!
At the end it might be a stroke of providence that this unconstitutional
bill was signed into law by an ineligible President, and that these responsive
pleadings were submitted for consideration only a few days before the day
of the ancient holiday of Passover, which celebrates freedom from bondage
and usurpation. It is time for the lawful and law abiding free sovereign
citizens of this Nation to have standing and representation alongside
free sovereign States to break from usurpation and bondage by the
oppressive Federal government, which seized powers that were never
granted to it by the US Constitution.
Wherefore: The undersigned Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ respectfully prays
for relief and granting of her motion of consolidation of cases 10-cv-151
RCL Taitz v Obama with 3:10cv-91 State of Florida et al v United States
Department of Health and Human services et al , to be heard jointly by the
Honorable Royce Lamberth, Chief Judge of US District court for the District
of Columbia.
Exhibits
1. Affidavit of retired Deportation Officer with the Department of
Homeland Security, private investigator John Sampson

Taitz v Obama Motion to Multidistrict Judicial Panel to consolidate 10-

cv-151 DC with 3:10-cv_91 FLND 8
 Case 1:10-cv-00151-RCL Document 17 Filed 03/25/10 Page 9 of 10

2. Affidavit of licensed private investigator, licensed with the

department of Homeland Security Susan Daniels
3. Affidavit of retired Scotland Yard anti-organized crime officer and
licensed private investigator, Neil Sankey
4. Affidavit of forensic document expert Sandra Ramsey Lines

/s/ DR ORLY TAITZ ESQ

By:__________________________________
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
California Bar No. 223433
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway # 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
Tel.: 949-683-5411
Fax: 949-766-7603
E-Mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com PROOF OF SERVICE

I CERTIFY THAT TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ABOVE

PLEADINGS WAS SERVED through electronic filing system on

Alan Burch,

Assistant US Attorney for the District of Columbia

555 4th st. NW

Washington DC, 20530-202-514-7204

/s/Orly Taitz

Dr. Orly Taitz Esq

Taitz v Obama Motion to Multidistrict Judicial Panel to consolidate 10-

cv-151 DC with 3:10-cv_91 FLND 9
 Case 1:10-cv-00151-RCL Document 17 Filed 03/25/10 Page 10 of 10

29839 Santa Margarita PKWY

Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688

Taitz v Obama Motion to Multidistrict Judicial Panel to consolidate 10-

cv-151 DC with 3:10-cv_91 FLND 10