Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Notes to Editors
HARD-LEFT FOREIGN AND DEFENCE POLICIES ON THE RISE
Corbyn has also called for the removal of Israels right to trade with the UK and
the EU: Its time, indeed past time, to demand the immediate suspension of the
trade agreements between the EU and Israel (Morning Star, 2 June 2010) and
cutting all off commercial and diplomatic ties: no arms, no money, no recognition
and no support for Israel (Haaretz, 13 April 2002, link). Corbyn was even heckled
at the Labour Party Conferences Labour Friends of Israel event for refusing to
refer to Israel by name in his speech (Daily Telegraph, 29 September 2015, link).
Both Corbyn and John McDonnell have sponsored a Commons motion urging the
boycotting of Israeli goods, including demanding that all supermarkets boycott
such goods (EDM 57, 14 May 2012). John McDonnell has told shops in his
constituency of Hayes to boycott Israeli goods... and find alternative suppliers
(Get West London, 1 August 2014).
By contrast, the last Labour leader, Ed Miliband, opposed such BDS policies: I
think the boycotts of Israel are totally wrong. We should have no tolerance for
boycotts. I would say that to any trade union leaders (Jewish Chronicle, 7 March
2013, link) and boycotts of Israel will never be a way of advancing the cause of
peace. They are the wrong response and I will never support them. Labour will
continue to resolutely oppose the isolation of Israel. The answer has to be greater
dialogue and greater engagement rather than disengagement and boycotts
(Jewish News, 1 May 2015, link).
The hard-left Campaign Against the Arms Trade has been lobbying for Local
Government Pension Schemes to divest funds in British manufacturers such as
BAe (link). Jeremy Corbyn has endorsed their campaign: The Campaign Against
the Arms Trade... has a long and honourable tradition... The scale of British arms
sales is truly astounding... we need a clear lead for arms conversion. Let the
brilliance and skill of those in the arms industry be converted for peaceful
purposes (Corbyn website).
Shadow Chancellor, John McDonnell, has similarly called for the end of the arms
trade (Guardian, 1 April 2009).
It is not for local government to pursue its own municipal foreign or defence
policies as rightly, that matter is reserved to the UK Government. The
Government has to take into account the international implications of such
policies, and the broader need to maintain stability and security in international
relations. Rather than encouraging legitimate debate, such boycotts are counterproductive they widen gaps in understanding, poison and polarise debate, and
block opportunities for co-operation and collaboration.
The call for municipal boycotts against Israel threatens to inflame tensions in local
communities, undermining integration and fuelling broader anti-Semitism. Such
militant boycotts have already led to hard-left groups pressuring supermarkets to
take Kosher products off their shelves (link), and Jewish films being banned as
part of such boycotts (link).
The campaign against British defence companies risk harming Britains export
trade and would destroy British jobs across the country. The UK defence sector
has a 22 billion turnover a year and contributes 10 billion to UK exports (ADS
fact sheet, link).
This Government wants to enhance the growing economic ties between the UK
and Israel, particular in areas like technology and science, as well as working
together to strengthen security against cyber-attacks and tackle Islamist
extremism (No10 press release, 10 September 2015).
The UK Government has put in place formal legal sanctions and restrictions at a
national level, when justified as in the national interest (link).
GOVERNMENT ACTION
The Government will take action to curtail such municipal foreign and defence policies:
The Cabinet Office will issue a revised Procurement Policy Note to public
authorities to make clear that boycotts in procurement policy are inappropriate,
outside where formal legal sanctions, embargoes and restrictions have been put
in place by the Government. Indeed, the WTO Government Procurement
Agreement an international market access agreement requires all those
countries that have signed up to the Agreement to treat suppliers equally. This
includes the EU and Israel. Any discrimination against Israeli suppliers involving
procurements covered by the Agreement would therefore be in breach of these
treaty obligations.