12345678910111213141516171819202122232425
RENECIA A. SMITH-WILSON, RMR, CRR
3(Thereupon, the following was heard in opencourt at 12:32 p.m.)THE CLERK: 1:09 civil 736, Rosetta Stone,LTD versus Google, Incorporated.MR. ROSS: Good morning, Your Honor.Terrance Ross for the plaintiff, Rosetta Stone, Limited.THE COURT: Good morning, Mr. Ross.MR. FRIEDEN: Good morning, Your Honor.John Frieden for the defendant, Google.It's my pleasure to introduce Margret Carusowho is admitted pro hac vice in this action.THE COURT: Good afternoon.MS. CARUSO: Good afternoon.THE COURT: I'm ready.MS. CARUSO: Good afternoon, Your Honor.Margret Caruso for the defendant, Google, Inc.We're here on Google's motion to dismissRosetta Stone's complaint. The primary basis for themotion is the party forum selection clause.This forum selection clause is very plainlanguage, and it requires that all claims relating toGoogle's programs, defined as Google's advertisingprograms, "be litigated exclusively in the federal orstate courts of Santa Clara County, California, USA".Unlike the earlier forum selection clause,
Case 1:09-cv-00736-GBL-TCB Document 20 Filed 09/25/09 Page 3 of 32