EMERGENCY MOTION TO ENJOIN CASE-FIXING AND

CONSPIRACY OF CASE-FIXING BY “LEGAL SLUT” SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL

EMERGENCY MOTION FOR RECUSAL OF OBJECTIVELY CORRUPT & PARTIAL

“LEGAL WHORE” CHAPPELL WHO ACCEPTED DEFENDANTS’ BRIBES

CRIMINAL CONCEALMENT AND CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL

BY “LEGAL WHORE” SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL:

CHAPPELL CAUGHT IN CRIME OF CONCEALING FORGED “PARCEL” “00A0”

1. In exchange for Defendants’ bribes, “legal whore” Sheri Polster Chappell fraudulently concealed,

and conspired with other Defendants to fraudulently conceal, facially forged record

Governmental “land” “claims” on file such as, e.g., “O.R. 569/875” and “12-44-20-01-

00000.00A0”. The Plaintiffs move this Court to enjoin “legal whore” Polster Chappell from

fraudulently concealing the prima facie nullity and illegality of said Governmental fraud schemes

in exchange for Defendants’ bribes.

CRIMINAL CONCEALMENT OF PLAINTIFFS’ STREET OWNERSHIP, PB 3, PG 25

2. Pursuant to the Federal Appellate Court records on file, Defendants Lee County and Lee County

Commissioners had asserted before the U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit, that the land

adjoining Plaintiffs’ upland was a “street” as legally described and conveyed to the Plaintiffs in

reference to the 1912 Cayo Costa Subdivision Plat recorded in Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25.

See 08/15/2008 Brief by said Defendants-Appellees (“by Jack N. Peterson”).

 CHAPPELL ILLEGALLY PUNISHED AND COERCED PLAINTIFF STREET OWNERS

3. Here, “legal slut” Chappell had illegally sanctioned and punished the Plaintiff record riparian

Gulf-front street owners merely because they conclusively and rightfully proved their

unimpeachable riparian Gulf-front “paper” street ownership, PB 3, PG 25 (1912), and exposed

Governmental corruption and forgeries. See PRESCOTT, No. 08-14846, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS

8678, 2009 WL 1059631; see Lee County Plat Book 3, p. 25; www.LeeClerk.org. Legal and

judicial prostitution are unlawful in America.

2
4. In particular, corrupt Chappell fraudulently concealed and conspired with other Defendants and

U.S. Attorney Jennifer Waugh Corinis that said platted adjoining riparian street “on the Gulf of

Mexico” could not have possibly been facially forged “parcel” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”, which

did not appear on said 1912 Subdivision Plat, PB 3, PG 25, as asserted and proven by Plaintiff Dr.

Jorg Busse before corrupt Chappell on November 7, 2007, in the presence of co-Plaintiff Jennifer

Franklin Prescott. See Transcript of Proceedings, Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions before the

dishonorable “legal whore” Sheri Polster Chappell. See PRESCOTT, No. 08-14846, 2009 U.S.

App. LEXIS 8678, 2009 WL 1059631; see Lee County Plat Book 3, p. 25; www.LeeClerk.org.

DEFENDANT WILKINSON versus DEFENDANTS LEE COUNTY

FORGED “PARCEL” “00A0” versus PLATTED GULF-FRONT STREET, PB 3, PB 25

END OF THE ROAD FOR LEGAL WHORE CHAPPELL’S CONCOCTIONS FOR BRIBES

5. Here, Defendant corrupt Chappell fraudulently concealed that Defendant Lee County Property

Appraiser Kenneth M. Wilkinson had “claimed” said platted “paper” street land to be forged

“parcel” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”, while Defendants Lee County and Lee County

Commissioners asserted the platted “street” and/or that Plaintiffs’ Gulf-front land adjoining their

upland was the platted riparian “street”, PB 3, PG 25 (1912). Worse, “legal whore” Chappell

knew and fraudulently concealed that Lee County, Florida, never held any title to Plaintiffs’ said

riparian Gulf-front street land. Here, the 11th circuit had declared the Plaintiffs the exclusive

record titleholders and owners of said street land “on the Gulf of Mexico”. See PRESCOTT, No.

08-14846, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8678, 2009 WL 1059631; see Lee County Plat Book 3, p. 25;

www.LeeClerk.org.

3
CHAPPELL ILLEGALLY PUNISHED PLAINTIFFS TO PROTECT HERSELF & OTHERS

6. Because corrupt Chappell had some legally and factually impossible explaining to do, she

unlawfully punished, strong-armed, and coerced the Plaintiffs to refrain from any further

prosecution in these Civil Rights Cases to “protect” her own dirty self and cover up her own

crimes of, e.g., obstruction of justice, deliberate deprivations, and fraud. See, e.g., 18 U.S.C. §

241, 242.

CORRUPT CHAPPELL CAUGHT AMID CONCOCTIONS OF “FRIVOLITY”

7. Here, corrupt Chappell got caught in her criminal act of fraudulently concealing Plaintiffs’

declared record street ownership and title [see PRESCOTT, No. 08-14846, 2009 U.S. App.

LEXIS 8678, 2009 WL 1059631; see Lee County Plat Book 3, p. 25; www.LeeClerk.org], and

after having accepted Defendants’ bribes, could no longer reconcile the fatally conflicting

“claims” of the riparian street as legally described in reference to PB 3, PG 25 [Def. Lee County],

and the fraudulent “claim” of facially forged “parcel” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” [Def.

Wilkinson]. Capriciously, rogue Chappell over and over “muzzled” and gagged the Plaintiffs and

extended said Governmental corruption scheme and custom of defrauding Cayo Costa private

parcel and street owners out of their lands and private implied easements (as legally described in

4
 reference to PB 3, PG 25) in the most criminal violations of the 1st, 14th, 4th, 5th, and 7th U.S.

Constitutional Amendments.

CORRUPT CHAPPELL CONCEALED BINDING PRECEDENT/PROOF OF

PLAINTIFFS’ UNIMPEACHABLE STREET OWNERSHIP, PB 3, PG 5

8. Pursuant to the binding precedent(s) on file and the dispositive April 2008 Declaration by said

Appellate Court, the Plaintiffs are the unimpeachable record owners of said “paper” street “on the

Gulf of Mexico”, PB 3, PG 25. See West Peninsular Title Co. v. Palm Beach County, 41

F.3d 1490, 1492 n.4 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 932, 116 S. Ct. 338, 133 L. Ed. 2d

237 (1995). See also 12/29/2000 LEE COUNTY MEMORANDUM; see PRESCOTT, No. 08-

14846, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8678, 2009 WL 1059631; see JOHN LAY AND JANET LAY v.

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, OGC CASE

NOs. 01-0203, 01-0204, DOAH CASE NOs. 01-1541, 01-1542, CASE NOs. DEP01-0860,

DEP01-0876.

FOR BRIBES CORRUPT CHAPPELL “STRUCK” CONCLUSIVE FRAUD EVIDENCE

9. Here, “legal slut” Chappell criminally struck again and got caught “striking” the conclusive

evidence of Governmental corruption and forgeries, PB 3, PG 25 (1912).

CHAPPELL’S LATEST THREAT & COERCION

10. In her latest illegal threat, Doc. # 98, corrupt Chappell coerced the Plaintiff declared

unimpeachable street land owners, PB 3, PG 25 (1912), to refrain from prosecuting those who

fraudulently and criminally “claimed” that Lee County, FL, purportedly held “title” to the platted

“street”, PB 3, PG 25, which was factually and legally absolutely impossible:

“the Court cautions the Plaintiffs that future filings containing immaterial and scandalous
matters may result in sanctions being imposed.”

5
 Here, Plat Book 3, Page 25 proved corrupt Chappell’s crimes. The Plaintiffs are re-submitting

fraudulently “stricken” Doc. ## 74, 75, and 76, which conclusively proved the alleged

Governmental corruption and said proven eminent domain forgeries and fraud. Furthermore

deceptively, corrupt Chappell mislead the Court, Doc. # 98, p. 2:

“The allegations appear to be based solely on the fact that the Plaintiff received adverse
rulings …”

11. Here, Plaintiffs’ proof and allegations of Governmental and judicial corruption and forgeries were

based on said record evidence and the criminal concealment of Plaintiffs’ street ownership, PB 3,

PG 25, in exchange for Defendants’ bribes.

DEMAND OF EMERGENCY ORDER ENJOINING FURTHER CRIMES BY CHAPPELL

12. The rogue and perverted measures of corrupt Chappell include striking evidence from the record

only to turn around and fraudulently pretend “frivolity”. The Plaintiffs will not be raped over and

over by “legal whore” Chappell and demand an EMERGENCY INJUNCTION preventing any

further case fixing and fraud on the Court by corrupt Chappell under false pretenses of Lee

County “ownership/title” and “frivolity” of Plaintiffs’ conclusive record proof of their allegations.

CHAPPELL’S NEW CRIMES - NEW CAUSE OF ACTION

13. In exchange for bribes, “legal whore” Chappell conspired with other Defendants to attach a

fraudulent “lien” against Plaintiffs’ property. Fraudulently, Chappell pretended and conspired to

pretend that said new cause(s) are purportedly precluded from adjudication.

APPARENT NON-RANDOM CASE ASSIGNMENT

14. Chappell has managed to get her dirty judicial hands on the majority of Plaintiff landowners’

Civil Rights Cases since 2006 despite apparently false pretenses of “random case assignment”.

Here, corrupt Chappell continued to conceal said Governmental forgeries since 2006 in favor of

6
 Defendants and in exchange for their bribes. Here, e.g., Magistrate Frazier was not assigned

despite the falsely pretended random assignment.

CHAPPELL’S PROSTITUTION AND PERVERSIONS WERE PROHIBITED

15. Because judicial and legal corruption, prostitution, and said record perversions of the truth and

public record are illegal in the United States of America, the Plaintiffs demand an EMERGENCY

ORDER enjoining objectively corrupt and partial “legal whore” Chappell from any further

extrinsic fraud on the Federal Court(s) and Chappell’s immediately removing Chappell from the

judicial bench.

CHAPPELL’S CONCOCTIONS & FRAUD ON THE COURT:

“KEEPING THE PLAINTIFFFS AWAY FROM COURT”

16. Chappell’s “orders”, e.g., Doc. # 98, have been for the unlawful purpose of “keeping the Plaintiffs

away from Court”, and obstructing meaningful court access and justice. Chappell’s crooked

custom and policy has been to, e.g., conceal the prima facie criminality of Governmental

forgeries “O.R. 569/875” and concoct and falsely pretend “frivolity” without any rational

explanation and/or justification.

FEDERAL COURTS MUST FOLLOW FLORIDA STATE LAW

17. Under the doctrine of Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins (1938), 304 U.S. 64, 58 S. Ct. 817, 82 L.

Ed. 1188, 114 A.L.R. 1487, a Federal court as to a non-federal matter is required to follow the

substantive statute and common law of the state in which it is sitting. Here, Florida State law

applied. However in exchange for Defendants’ bribes, Polster Chappell prostituted herself and

perverted Florida state law, Florida’s self-enforcing Marketable Record Title Act, eminent

domain Statutes, and Constitution, which expressly prohibit eminent domain and/or

condemnation without due process and outside a court of law.

7
 IN CHAPPELL’S COURT “IN DUE COURSE” MEANS DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS

18. In corrupt Chappell’s courtroom “in due course” means due denial of due process, perversions of

the truth and public record, and punishment. See Transcript of 11/07/2007 Proceedings, Motion

for Rule 11 Sanctions, before the dishonorable Sheri Polster Chappell, U.S. Magistrate Judge,

2007 Civil Rights Case No. 2:07-CV-228-FtM-JES-SPC (S. Polster Chappell).

PLAINTIFFS DEMAND EMERGENCY ORDER STOPPING JUDICIAL CRIMES

19. The Plaintiffs demand an EMERGENCY ORDER enjoining Chappell from any further

perversions of said 1912 record Plat, PB 3, PG 25, in reference to which Plaintiffs’ riparian street

land and upland “on the Gulf of Mexico” were legally described and conveyed. The Plaintiffs

demand an immediate end to Chappell’s record crimes.

DEFENDANTS’ FRAUD SCHEMES WERE CRIMINAL ACTS

20. Defendant corrupt Judge Chappell engaged in schemes, devices, and/or artifices to defraud

and deliberately deprive the Plaintiffs of justice and court access. In particular, said Defendant

Chappell knew and fraudulently concealed:

a. The record judicial “frivolity” scheme and conspiracy;

b. Forged parcel “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” scheme; see PB 3, PG 25;

c. “Lack of jurisdiction” scheme;

d. Forged “claim” “O.R. 569/875” scheme; see PB 3, PG 25;

e. Forged parcel “07-44-21-01-00001.0000” scheme; see PB 3, PG 25;

f. “Lack of ripeness” scheme.

DEF. CHAPPELL’S FRAUD AND FRAUD ON COURT, DOC. # 98, FILED 03/25/10

1. Defendant corrupt U.S. Magistrate Sheri Polster Chappell procured her Order, Doc. # 98, filed

03/25/2010, through fraud and fraud on the Court and in exchange for Defendants’ bribes.

8
 EMERGENCY

2. Pursuant to public policy, Governmental corruption and crimes are an emergency, which erode

the very foundation of our society like cancer. When brazen Governmental and judicial

corruption deliberately deprive American people of, e.g., 1st, 14th, 4th, 5th, and 7th Constitutional

Amendment rights in bright day light, America faces an emergency of the first order. Rather than

treat the cancer as an emergency, this Court has been spreading the cancer and concealing cures

such as truth, honesty, and knowledge.

3. Until and unless Governmental record forgeries such as, e.g., fake “parcels” “12-44-20-01-

00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”, and scam “O.R. 569/875” have been removed

from the books, the emergency continues. Any other argument by this Court is considered further

evidence of reckless concealment of Governmental corruption and fraud.

4. Public policy prohibits the custom of “Government covers up Governmental corruption”. Here on

the record, corrupt Judges covered up the crimes of the legislative part of government. The

prosecution of such crimes and violations is an emergency.

KEEPING THE PLAINTIFFS AWAY FROM COURT IN EXCHANGE FOR BRIBES

5. The Plaintiff unimpeachable landowners had objected and hereby again object to any and all

orders by named party Defendant corrupt U.S. Magistrate Sheri Polster Chappell, because

Chappell fraudulently concealed Governmental forgeries in exchange for Defendants’ bribes.

CHAPPELL’S FALSE AND FRAUDULENT PRETENSES

6. By falsely pretending that Governmental forgeries “O.R. 569/875” and facially forged and non-

existent fake “parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000” were

“genuine issues”, and that Plaintiffs’ conclusive proof of said fraud schemes were purportedly

“frivolous” and/or “meritless”, Defendant Chappell “kept the Plaintiffs away from Court” and

9
 obstructed justice in exchange for bribes. Here, “legal whore” Chappell “struck” again by

“ordering” to “strike” the conclusive evidence of Governmental corruption and fraud, Doc. ## 74,

75, 76.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT OF PROOF OF GOVERNMENTAL FORGERIES

7. In exchange for Defendants’ bribes, Defendant corrupt U.S. Magistrate Sheri Polster Chappell

procured her “Order”, Doc. # 98, through fraud on the Court and for the unlawful purpose of

fraudulently concealing the prima facie criminality, illegality, and nullity of Governmental

forgeries “O.R. 569/875”.

8. Said Defendant corrupt Judge Chappell “ordered” the conclusive proof, Doc. ## 74, 75, 76, of the

criminality, illegality, and nullity of facially forged eminent domain “claim” “O.R. 569/875”

“stricken” for the unlawful purpose of concealing Chappell’s own [extra] judicial crimes.

CHAPPELL CONCEALED FACIALLY FORGED “PARCEL” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”

9. In particular, Chappell fraudulently concealed facially forged “parcel” 12-44-20-01-

00000.00A0”, which Chappell knew never appeared on the 1912 Subdivision Plat of Survey in

Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25. As a matter of law and fact, said forged “parcel” never legally

existed. See PRESCOTT, No. 08-14846, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8678, 2009 WL 1059631; see

Lee County Plat Book 3, p. 25; www.LeeClerk.org.

CHAPPELL CONCEALED FACIALLY FORGED “PARCEL” “07-44-21-01-00001.00A0

10. Just like a “legal whore”, Chappell accepted Defendants’ bribes for the unlawful purpose of

fraudulently concealing forged “parcel” “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”, which was never platted,

subdivided, and/or legally described in reference to said 1912 Plat of Survey, PB 3, PG 25.

10
 CHAPPELL CONCEALED RIPARIAN GULF-FRONT “PAPER” STREET, PB 3, PG 25

11. Here, “legal whore” Chappell knew that in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit,

Defendants Lee County had asserted the platted riparian “paper” street rather than said forged

parcels.

12. Rather than being a “legal referee”, “legal whore” Chappell unintelligently and capriciously

contradicted Defendant Lee County’s assertion of said platted “paper” street, PB 3, PG 25 (1912)

in exchange for bribes.

CHAPPELL CONCEALED & “ORDERED” BINDING PRECEDENT “STRICKEN”

13. Here, Defendant corrupt Chappell fraudulently concealed and “ordered” “stricken” the binding

precedent of, e.g.:

West Peninsular Title Co. v. Palm Beach County, 41 F.3d. 1490, 1492, n.4 (11th Cir.),
cert. denied, 516 U.S. 932, 116 S.Ct. 338, 133 L.Ed. 2d 237 (1995).

See Doc. 76-1, filed 03/05/10, page 22 of 37.

14. Here, Defendant corrupt Polster Chappell “struck” again, perverted the truth, and obstructed

justice. Chappell knew that the Plaintiffs were the declared unimpeachable record owners of their

riparian Gulf-front “paper” street as legally described and conveyed to the Plaintiffs in reference

to Plat Book 3, Page 25 (1912):

See also JOHN LAY AND JANET LAY v. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, OGC CASE Nos. 01-0203, 01-0204,
DOAH CASE Nos. 01-1541, 01-1542, CASE Nos. DEP01-0860, DEP01-0876.

See Doc. 76-1, filed 03/05/10, page 21 of 37.

“LEGAL WHORE” CHAPPELL WAS OBJECTIVELY PARTIAL AND CORRUPT

15. No intelligent, fit, and honest judge, juror, and/or person in corrupt Chappell’s shoes could have

possibly found said facially forged “parcels” to appear on said 1912 Plat of Survey, PB 3, PG 25.

11
16. In exchange for Defendants’ bribes, “legal whore” Chappell corrupted the judicial process and

illegally punished the Plaintiff(s) for conclusively proving the record nullity and illegality of said

facially forged and fraudulently “claimed” “parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-

01-00001.0000”.

CHAPPELL RAPED RIGHT TO REDRESS GOVERNMENTAL GRIEVANCES

17. Here, Defendant corrupt Chappell raped Plaintiffs’ right to redress governmental grievances, 1st

U.S. Constitutional Amendment, and conclusively prove Governmental eminent domain extortion

and fraud scheme “O.R. 569/875”.

“STRIKING” CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE OF FRAUD & CORRUPTION WAS A CRIME

18. “Striking” Plaintiffs’ material, relevant, reliable, competent, and conclusive evidence of

Governmental corruption and fraud obstructed justice and was a crime.

CORRUPT CHAPPELL HAS NO IMMUNITY

19. Here, Defendant Polster Chappell has no immunity and is to be prosecuted for her extra-judicial

crimes like any other citizen pursuant to public policy.

RE-FILING OF PROOF OF CRIMINALITY OF FORGED CLAIM “O.R. 569/875”

20. The Plaintiff declared unimpeachable record owners of Lee County riparian Gulf-front Parcel #

12-44-20-01-00015.015A hereby refile their conclusive proof of the nullity and illegality of “Lee

County” eminent domain fraud scheme “O.R. 569/875”, Doc. ## 74, 75, 76.

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS DISPOSITIVELY DECLARED PLAINTIFFS’ OWNERSHIP

21. The U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit, had dispositively declared the Plaintiffs the

unimpeachable record owners of said riparian “paper” street “on the Gulf of Mexico” as legally

described in reference to said record Plat of Survey on file, PB 3, PG 25. See PRESCOTT, No.

12
 08-14846, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8678, 2009 WL 1059631; see Lee County Plat Book 3, p. 25;

www.LeeClerk.org.

22. Here, “legal whore” Chappell “ordered” the conclusive evidence of Plaintiffs’ declaredly

unimpeachable record ownership and title to said riparian Parcel “12-44-20-01-00015.015A” and

Plaintiffs’ riparian “paper” street “on the Gulf of Mexico” “stricken”, PB 3, PG 25 (1912).

23. Therefore, the Plaintiffs object to said “legal whore” Chappell’s record crimes and her acceptance

of Defendants’ bribes. Chappell’s record case fixing and concealment of evidence are crimes for

which Defendant Chappell is being prosecuted.

CHAPPELL PRESIDES OVER HER OWN PROSECUTION(S)

24. Here, named party Defendant corrupt Judge Chappell has been presiding over her own

prosecution(s) for, e.g., fraudulent concealment of Governmental corruption and fraud,

obstruction of justice, fraud on the Court, and deliberate deprivations of Plaintiffs’ Constitutional

rights directly under the 1st, 14th, 4th, 5th, and 7th Amendments.

CORRUPT CHAPPELL COVERED UP HER CRIMES

25. Here, “legal whore” Polster Chappell never had any “power” to “strike” conclusive record

evidence of governmental corruption and said “Lee County” forgeries. Here, Defendant corrupt

Chappell struck the conclusive evidence of counterfeit “claim” “O.R. 569/875” for the unlawful

purpose of covering up her own crimes in exchange for Defendants’ bribes.

CHAPPELL CRIMINALLY COERCED PLAINTIFFS

26. Here, corrupt Chappell coerced the Plaintiffs to refrain from prosecuting her and the other

Defendants:

“However, the Court cautions the Plaintiffs that future filings containing immaterial and
scandalous matters may result in sanctions being imposed.”

13
 See Doc. # 98, filed 03/25/2010, page 2 of 4.

27. Here, e.g., Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25 (1912) were neither “immaterial” nor “scandalous”.

Here, the “matters” of PB 3, PG 25 directly evidenced corrupt Chappell’s fraudulent concealment

of, e.g., Governmental forgeries “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”, “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”, and a

“park” which never legally existed within said private undedicated residential Cayo Costa

Subdivision.

ILLEGAL SANCTIONS TO COERCE PLAINTIFFS TO REFRAIN FROM LITIGATION

28. “Legal whore” Chappell had no authority or power to “sanction” the Plaintiffs for blowing the

whistle on said Governmental forgeries. Here, “legal whore” Chappell falsely pretended that the

prima facie criminality, illegality, and nullity of facially forged “claim” “O.R. 569/875”, facially

forged and un-platted “parcel” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”, and facially forged “park” were

purportedly not “legal arguments for the Court’s review”:

“The Plaintiff continually asserts that Judges in the Middle District of Florida are corrupt
and have participated in a conspiracy against him. The allegations appear to be based
solely on the fact that the Plaintiff received adverse rulings from judges in the Middle
District of Florida and from the Eleventh Circuit. A review of the Plaintiff’s filings
demonstrate that the Plaintiff’s Motions are immaterial and scandalous, and do not
present legal arguments for the Court’s review. Therefore, the Court finds good cause to
strike the Motions.”

See Doc. # 98, filed 03/25/2010, pages 2 and 3 of 4.

Here, the conclusively proven Governmental eminent domain extortion and fraud schemes on

record and in violation of, e.g., the 14th, 4th, 5th Amendments were of course legal arguments for

the Court’s review. Here, corrupt Chappell “kept the Plaintiffs away from the Court” and

perpetrated fraud on the Court. The “conspiracy” to fraudulently conceal said Governmental

forgeries and Plaintiffs’ unimpeachable ownership were patently clear.

14
29. The U.S. Court of Appeals’ dispositive declaration of Plaintiffs unimpeachable record ownership

of and title to said adjoining “paper” street was not an adverse ruling but proved the prima facie

nullity and illegality of said Governmental forgeries and Chappell’s crimes.

30. Here, the Plaintiffs proved record Governmental corruption and fraud under false pretenses that

forgeries “O.R. 569/875” were purportedly a “resolution” and/or “legislative act”. Here, “legal

whore” Chappell knew that Defendants’ “legal argument” of “eminent domain” or condemnation

by law was facially fraudulent and unrecognized by the law.

31. Here, rogue Chappell rambled unintelligently and irrationally and did not answer where facially

forged “parcels” “12-44-20-01-00015.015A” and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000” could possibly be

found on Page 25 in Plat Book 3.

CHAPPELL CONCEDED ILLEGALITY OF STRIKING CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE

32. Here, corrupt Chappell conceded the illegality of striking Plaintiffs’ conclusive evidence of the

nullity and criminality of said Governmental forgeries:

“A motion to strike will usually be denied unless the allegations have no possible relation
to the controversy and may cause prejudice to one of the parties. Harvey, 2005 WL
1421170 (citing Scelta v. Delicatessen Support Services, Inc., 57 F. Supp. 2d 1327, 1347
(M.D. Fla. 1997).”

See Doc. # 98, filed 03/25/2010, page 2 of 4.

33. Here, “legal slut” Chappell knew that Defendants’ motion had to be denied, because said record

forgeries directly “related” to said uncontroverted Governmental eminent domain extortion and

fraud schemes on file.

CROOKED DEFENDANT “LEGAL WHORE” CHAPPELL MUST BE RECUSED

34. Plain and short, Chappell is an unusually crooked “legal whore”, who, in exchange for

Defendants’ bribes, concocted that, e.g., the Cayo Costa Subdivision Plat in Plat Book 3, Page 25

(1912) was purportedly “immaterial” and “scandalous”. Here, said Plat was an integral part of

15
 Plaintiffs’ conveyance and therefore highly material and relevant. In these civil rights actinos,

corrupt Chappell displayed her objective partiality, ignorance, and arrogance. Pursuant to 28

U.S.C § 455, named party Defendant objectively partial and corrupt Judge Chappell must be

recused.

CHAPPELL CONCEALED ABSOLUTE IMPOSSIBILITY OF LEE COUNTY OWNERSHIP

35. Any and all platted Cayo Costa Subdivision land between the natural boundaries and monuments

of the “Gulf of Mexico” and “Charlotte Harbor” belonged to Alexander C. Roesch and his

successors-in-title, PB 3, PG 25 (1912). Defendants Lee County never were successors-in-title to

Plaintiffs’ riparian Gulf-front “paper” street adjoining their upland. Here, “legal whore” Chappell

concealed that Lee County, Florida, never held title to Plaintiffs’ platted adjoining riparian

“paper” street and easement “on the Gulf of Mexico”, PB 3, PG 25 (1912), and that “parcel” “12-

44-20-01-00000.00A0” was facially forged. See PRESCOTT, No. 08-14846, 2009 U.S. App.

LEXIS 8678, 2009 WL 1059631; see Lee County Plat Book 3, p. 25; www.LeeClerk.org.

36. Here, the land under Plaintiffs’ adjoining riparian “paper” street “on the Gulf of Mexico” was a

street as legally described and conveyed to the Plaintiffs in reference to PB 3, PG 25 (1912) and

not fake “parcel” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”, which corrupt Chappell knew never existed. See

Transcript of 11/07/2007 Proceedings, Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions, before the dishonorable

Sheri Polster Chappell, U.S. Magistrate Judge, 2007 Civil Rights Case No. 2:07-CV-228-FtM-

JES-SPC (Chappell).

CORRUPT CHAPPELL CONCEALED PLAINTIFFS’ ADJOINING STREET OWNERSHIP

37. Here, “legal whore” Chappell knew and fraudulently concealed that Plaintiffs’ adjoining “paper”

street and easement “on the Gulf of Mexico” could not have possibly been the forged and non-

existent “parcel” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”.

16
 “In evaluating a motion to strike, the court must treat all well pleaded facts as admitted
and cannot consider matters beyond the pleadings. Microsoft Corp. v. Jesse’s Computers
& Repair, Inc., 211 F.R.D. 681, 683 (M.D. Fla. 2002).”

See Doc. # 98, filed 03/25/2010, page 2 of 4.

CHAPPELL CONCEALED WELL PLEADED CRIMINALITY OF SCAM ‘O.R. 569/875’

38. Here with wanton disregard for the truth and “well pleaded” public record “facts” on file, PB 3,

PG 25, “O.R. 569/875”, corrupt Chappell deliberately deprived and defrauded the Plaintiffs, 18

U.S.C. §§ 241, 242. Here in exchange for bribes, corrupt Chappell did not treat the “well pleaded

facts” of Plaintiffs unimpeachable record ownership of said adjoining riparian “paper” street and

the Governmental forgery of un-platted and non-existent fake “parcel” “12-44-20-01-

00000.00A0” as “admitted”. See Transcript of 11/07/2007 Proceedings, Motion for Rule 11

Sanctions, before the dishonorable Sheri Polster Chappell, U.S. Magistrate Judge, 2007 Civil

Rights Case No. 2:07-CV-228-FtM-JES-SPC (Chappell).

CORRUPT CHAPPELL CONCEALED NULLITY/CRIMINALITY OF FORGED “CLAIM”

39. Here for bribes, “legal whore” Chappell did not treat the “well pleaded facts” that prima facie

Governmental scam “O.R. 569/875” was never signed and/or adopted by “Lee County” and null

and void ab initio as “admitted”.

40. Here for bribes, “legal whore” Chappell did not treat the “well pleaded facts” that the U.S. Court

of Appeals, 11th Circuit, had dispositively declared the Plaintiffs the record owners of their

adjoining riparian street land “on the Gulf of Mexico”, riparian subject Parcel # 12-44-20-01-

00015.015A, as “admitted”. See PRESCOTT, No. 08-14846, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8678, 2009

WL 1059631; see Lee County Plat Book 3, p. 25; www.LeeClerk.org.

41. Here for bribes, “legal whore” Chappell did not treat the “well pleaded facts” that prima facie

scam “O.R. 569/875” was not any eminent domain document or “muniment of title” as “admitted”

17
 but sanctioned Plaintiffs for the illegally purpose of coercing them to refrain from prosecution of

the Defendant corrupt Governmental Officials.

42. Here for bribes, “legal whore” Chappell did not treat the “well pleaded facts” that under oath,

Defendant Roger Alejo had determined the “Gulf of Mexico” to be the natural boundary of

Plaintiffs’ riparian Parcel 12-44-20-01-00015.015A as “admitted”.

43. Here for bribes, “legal whore” Chappell did not treat the “well pleaded facts” that Plaintiffs were

the unimpeachable record owners and title holders to said adjoining riparian street land pursuant

to Florida’s self-enforcing Marketable Record Title Act as “admitted”.

POLSTER CHAPPELL PERVERTED THE WELL PLEADED FACTS

44. Here, corrupt Chappell accepted Defendants’ bribes for the unlawful purpose of perverting the

well pleaded and conclusively proven facts on record.

OBJECTION TO ANY INVOLVEMENT OF DEFENDANT CORRUPT JUDGE CHAPPELL

45. The Plaintiffs object to any involvement of “legal whore” Chappell in these proceedings, because

since at least 2007, Chappell knew and fraudulently concealed for bribes that forged “parcels”

“12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000” had never legally existed and could

not have possibly been “owned” by Defendants Lee County, PB 3, PG 25. See Transcript of

11/07/2007 Proceedings, Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions, before the dishonorable Sheri Polster

Chappell, U.S. Magistrate Judge, 2007 Civil Rights Case No. 2:07-CV-228-FtM-JES-SPC

(Chappell).

NOTICE OF PUBLICATIONS OF DOC. ## 74, 75, 76

IN SUPPORT OF FRAUD ON COURT BY “LEGAL WHORE” S. POLSTER CHAPPELL,

WHO CONCEALED PLAINTIFFS’ EVIDENCE OF GOVERNMENTAL CORRUPTION

IN EXCHANGE FOR DEFENDANTS’ BRIBES

18
46. The Plaintiffs hereby give notice of their publications of Doc. ## 74, 75, 76 in this Civil Rights

Case. Said publications further evidence the fraudulent concealment of Governmental corruption,

fraud, and said forgeries by “legal whore” Sheri Polster Chappell. See

http://www.scribd.com/Judicial%20Fraud:

381 Documents as to Governmental corruption in Fort Myers, FL

31,503 Reads of Evidence of Governmental eminent domain fraud & corruption
129 Downloads of Governmental corruption evidence

19