March 29-April 4, 2010
3
Please help bring respect to National Press Club
From page 1From page 1
Villar & Co. earned P42Bin housing scam
Noy is 38%, Gibo 16%, Villar 14%in 7-11 survey of 265,552 gulps
From page 1
In Cainta, Rizal, 1) Aquino
44% at 569; 2) Villar 15% at199; 3) Teodoro 13% at 164;4) Gordon 7% at 95; 5) Vil
-
lanueva 6% at 75; 6) Estrada6% at 71; 7) Undecided 3%
at 42; 8) Madrigal 3% at 35;
9) Perlas 2% at 20; 10) delos
Reyes 1% at 17.In Calasiao, Pangasinan, 1)
Aquino 48% at 410; 2) Villar 20% at 175; 3) Gordon 10%at 89; 4) Teodoro 9% at 74;5) Estrada 5% at 41; 6) Unde
-cided 3% at 27; 7) Villanueva
3% at 24; 8) Perlas 1% at 9;10) Madrigal 1% at 8; and 11)delos Reyes 1% at 6.
In Caloocan City, 1) Aqui-no 38% at 1,155; 2) Teodoro
17% at 504; 3) Villar 15% at449; 4) Gordon 11% at 340; 5)Estrada 6% at 187; 6) Unde
-
cided 5% at 150; 7) Villanue
-
va 4% at 126; 8) Madrigal 2%at 55; 9) Perlas 1% at 28; and10) delos Reyes 1% at 19.
In Candelaria, QuezonProvince, 1) Aquino 42% at
119; 2) Gordon 17% at 47; 3)
Teodoro 15% at 41; 4) Villar 12% at 33; 5) Undecided 5%
at 13; 6) Estrada 4% at 12; 7)Villanueva, 3% at 9; 9) delosReyes, 1% at 3; 10) Madrigal
1% at 2; and 11) Perlas 1% at2.In Capas, Tarlac, 1) Aquino
43% at 140; 2) Teodoro 24%at 79; 3) Villar 11% at 37; 4)Gordon 9% at 29; 5) Estrada4% at 14; 6) Villanueva 3%at 10; 7) Undecided 2% at 7;8) Madrigal 1% at 4; 9) delosReyes 1% at 2; and 10) Perlas0% at 1.
In Carmona, Cavite, 1)
Aquino, 34% at 109; 2) Villar,21% at 66; 3) Gordon, 13% at41; 4) Teodoro, 9% at 30; 5)Undecided, 8% at 25; 6) Es
-trada, 7% at 22; 8) Madrigal,
4% at 12; 9) Villanueva, 3%at 11; 10) Perlas, 1% at 4; and11) delos Reyes, 0% at 1.
In Cavite City, 1) Aquino43% at 337; 2) Villar 17% at
136; 3) Gordon 11% at 91; 4)
Teodoro 11% at 88; 5) Unde-
cided 8% at 60; 6) Estrada 6%at 46; 7) Villanueva 3% at 21;8) Perlas 1% at 5; 9) Madrigal1% at 4; 10) delos Reyes 1%
at 4.In Antipolo City, 1) Aquino
41% at 1319; 2) Teodoro 14%
at 447; 3) Villar 13% at 431;
4) Gordon 11% at 369; 5) Es
-
trada 8% at 269; 6) Undecided
5% at 152; 7) Villanueva 3%
at 96; 8) Madrigal 2% at 59;9) delos Reyes 1% at 44; 10)
Perlas 1% at 32.In Balanga City, Bataan, 1)Aquino 41% at 1282; 2) Villar
9% at 590; 3) Teodoro 13% at394; 4) Gordon 7% at 203; 5)Villanueva 6% at 190; 6) Un
-
decided 6% at 187; 7) Estrada
5% at 141; 8) Madrigal 2% at
66; 9) delos Reyes 1% at 24;10) Perlas 1% at 23.
In Calamba City, 1) Aqui-
no 39% at 1251; 2) Teodoro14% at 459; 3) Villar 13% at
411; 4) Gordon 12% at 385; 5)
Villanueva 7% at 228; 6) Un
-
decided 7% at 226; 7) Estrada6% at 188; 8) Madrigal 1% at46; 9) Perlas 1% at 31; 10) de
-los Reyes 1% at 23.In Gapan City, Nueva Eci-
ja, 1) Aquino 33% at 236; 2)Gordon 18% at 126; 3) Villar 15% at 105; 4) Teodoro 11%at 77; 5) Estrada 9% at 67; 6)
Undecided 7% at 53; 7) Mad-
rigal 4% at 30; 8) Villanueva1% at 10; 9) delos Reyes 1%at 5; 10) Perlas 1% at 5.
In Las Piñas City, HOME
OF VILLAR, 1) Aquino 30%at 1095; 2) Villar 26% at 946;3) Teodoro 16% at 597; 4)Gordon 10% at 375; 5) Es
-
trada 7% at 248; 6) Undecided
5% at 188; 7) Villanueva 3%
at 126; 8) Madrigal 2% at 61;9) Perlas 1% at 41; 10) delos
Reyes 1% at 28.In Makati City, 1) Aquino
40% at 7359; 2) Teodoro 18%at 3305; 3) Gordon 12% at2308; 4) Villar 11% at 2052;5) Undecided 8% at 1396; 6)Estrada 7% at 1207; 7) Villan
-
ueva 2% at 399; 8) Madrigal1% at 225; 9) delos Reyes 1%at 121; 10) Perlas 1% at 117.
In Malolos City, 1) Aquino
46% at 1025; 2) Teodoro 12%at 276; 3) Villar 12% at 275;
4) Gordon 8% at 181; 5) Un-
decided 7% at 167; 6) Estrada6% at 123; 7) Villanueva 5%at 105; 8) delos Reyes 1% at32; 9) Perlas 1% at 23; 10)
Madrigal 1% at 22.In Mandaluyong City, 1)Aquino 38% at 2583; 2) Te-odoro 18% at 1224; 3) Villar
13% at 905; 4) Gordon 12% at839; 5) Estrada 7% at 502; 6)Undecided 5% at 361; 7) Vil
-
lanueva 3% at 202; 8) Madri
-
gal 1% at 89; 9) Perlas 1% at45; 10) delos Reyes 1% at 43.
In Marikina City, 1) Aqui-
no 39% at 1988; 2) Villar 14%at 699; 3) Teodoro 14% at 693;4) Gordon 12% at 590; 5) Es
-
trada 7% at 346; 6) Undecided6% at 304; 7) Villanueva 4%at 215; 8) Madrigal 2% at 95;9) delos Reyes 1% at 62; 10)Perlas 1% at 50.
In Meycauayan City; 1)
Aquino 44% at 439; 2) Villar
14% at 145; 3) Teodoro 14%
at 136; 4) Gordon 11% at 106;5) Estrada7% at 66; 6) Unde
-cided 5% at 47; 7) Villanueva3% at 32; 8) Madrigal 1% at
15; 9) delos Reyes 1% at 12;10) Perlas 1% at 9.
In Muntinlupa City, 1)
Aquino 38% at 1362; 2) Te
-
odoro 16% at 569; 3) Villar 15% at 537; 4) Gordon 10% at369; 5) Estrada7% at 246; 6)
Undecided 7% at 235; 7) Vil-
lanueva 3% at 119; 8) Madri
-
gal 1% at 48; 9) Perlas 1% at31; 10) delos Reyes 1% at 22.
In Parañaque City, 1)Aquino 38% at 3243; 2) Te-
odoro 16% at 1397; 3) Vil
-
lar 16% at 1373; 4) Gordon11% at 968; 5) Estrada 7% at585; 6) Undecided 6% at 488;7) Villanueva 3% at 240; 8)Madrigal 1% at 127; 9) delosReyes 1% at 77; 10) Perlas1% at 49.
In Pasig City, 1) Aquino
40% at 5519; 2) Teodoro 16%at 2263; 3) Gordon 12% at1697; 4) Villar 12% at 1603;5) Undecided 7% at 972; 6)Estrada 6% at 842; 7) Villan
-
ueva 3% at 363; 8) Madrigal2% at 233; 9) Perlas 1% at119; 10) delos Reyes 1% at
113.In San Fernando City, 1)
Aquino 28% at 56, 2) Teodoro
27% at 53; 3) Villar 14% at27; 4) Gordon 12% at 24; 5)
Estrada 7% at 13; 6) Madrigal
4% at 8; 7) Perlas 2% at 4; 8)
Undecided 2% at 4; 9) delosReyes 2% at 4; 10) Villanueva
2% at 4.In San Jose Del Monte
City, 1) Aquino 33% at 580; 2)Villar 16% at 278; 3) Teodoro12% at 216; 4) Estrada 12% at203; 5) Gordon 11% at 201; 6)Undecided 7% at 126; 7) Vil
-lanueva 3% at 58; 8) Madrigal
2% 41; 9) delos Reyes 2% at31; 10) Perlas 1% at 24.
In San Juan City, 1) Aqui-
no 40% at 949; 2) Teodoro
18% at 417; 3) Gordon 13%
at 297; 4) Estrada at 11% at266; 5) Villar 10% at 234; 6)Undecided 4% at 95; 7) Vil
-
lanueva 2% at 56; 8) Madrigal1% at 28; 9) Perlas 1% at 18;10) delos Reyes 1% at 13.
In Santa Rosa City, 1)
Aquino 40% at 948; 2) Villar
14% at 344; 3) Teodoro 14%at 323; 4) Gordon 11% at 271;
5) Undecided 7% at 165; 6)Estrada 6% at 139; 7) Villan
-ueva 3% at 73; 8) Madrigal
2% at 45; 9) delos Reyes 2%at 42; 10) Perlas 2% at 41.
In Tanauan City, 1) Aquino
45% at 168; 2) Teodoro 12%
at 45; 3) Villar 11% at 42; 4)
Villanueva 9% at 33; 5) Gor
-
don 8% at 31; 6) Undecided6% at 21; 7) Estrada 5% at 20;8) Madrigal 1% at 5; 9) delosReyes 1% at 4; 10) Perlas 1%
at 2.In Tarlac City, 1) Aquino
45% at 168, 2) Teodoro 12%
at 45; 3) Villar 11% at 42; 4)
Villanueva; 9% at 33; 5) Gor
-
don 8% at 31; 6) Undecided;6% at 21; 7) Estrada 5% at 20;8) Madrigal 1% at 5; 9) delosReyes 1% at 4; 10) Perlas 1%
at 2.In Tayabas City, 1) Aquino
51% at 59; 2) Villar 15% at
17; 3) Teodoro 15% at 17; 4)
Estrada 6% at 7; 5) Gordon5% at 6; 6) Villanueva 3% at
4; 7) Undecided 3% at 3; 8)
delos Reyes 1% at 1; 9) Perlas
1% at 1.In Urdaneta City, 1) Aqui-
no 33% at 601; 2) Villar 23%
at 418; 3) Teodoro 17% at
310; 4) Undecided 8% at 151;5) Gordon 8% at 146; 6) Es
-
trada 6% at 119; 7) Madrigal
2% at 42; 8) Villanueva 2%
at 39; 9) Perlas 1% at 13; 10)delos Reyes 0% 8.
In Valenzuela City, 1)
Aquino 40% at 2968; 2) Te
-
odoro 16% at 1199; 3) Vil
-
lar 14% at 1039; 4) Gordon10% at 754; 5) Estrada 6% at449; 6) Undecided 6% at 434;
7) Villanueva 4% at 284; 8)
Madrigal 2% at 123; 9) delosReyes 1% at 85; 10) Perlas
1% at 78.In Concepcion, 1) Aquino
55% at 1460; 2) Villar 14% at381; 3) Teodoro 13% at 350;4) Gordon 5% at 129; 5) Un
-
decided 4% at 110; 6) Villan
-ueva 3% at 88; 7) Estrada 2%
at 53; 8) Madrigal 1% at 39;9) delos Reyes 1% at 29; 10)
Perlas 1% at 17.In Dagupan City, 1) Aqui-
no 39% at 1443, 2) Teodoro18% at 684; 3) Villar 18% at
To page 7
going up to 250T through
the years). This fund would be managed by the NationalHome Mortgage FinanceCorp. (NHMFC - an agencyof HUDCC). The NHMFCthen established quotas for al-locating the annual commonfunds of SSS, Pag-Ibig, andGSIS based on the buildingcapacities of registered de-velopers. The largest quotasevery year were for the Ca-mella and Palmera (C & P)company of Villar which got avery large chunk of the fundsfor their home mortgages.Within the annual quotasunder the law, builders couldsubmit completed mortgagesand NHMFC would promptly buy them at their face amountsand pay the builder. It was the builders who actively soldmortgages in the malls andeverywhere else, approvedthe papers, and submittedthem to NHMFC. NHMFConly checked to see that theamounts of mortgages sub-mitted by the builders werewithin their annual quotas be-fore paying; it did not check the credit-worthiness of the borrower or even if the paperswere genuine in that the stated borrower was a real personand the house being mort-gaged actually existed.The situation the law cre-ated was unique in the entireworld. The pooled funds of SSS, Pag-Ibig and GSIS wereeffectively put into the handsof developers, who built thehouses, found buyers willingto take out mortgages, ap- proved the mortgages, sub-mitted them to the NHMFC,and got the money in a fewmonths. In effect, the builder controlled the credit fundsand approved the loans usingfunds that were not theirs butwere funds of SSS, Pag-Ibig,and GSIS.
This was a clear conict of
interest, for the builder would
maximize his prots from
easy credit and would not bear the cost of mortgage de-faults. Naturally, lots of prob-lems arose in just a few years
-- fake mortgages to ctitious
borrowers, nonexistent hous-es sold to nonexistent buyers,and the more common case:real, but substandard, houses,hastily sold to buyers whoclearly did not have the capac-ity to pay back the loan duringthe agreed loan period. By thetime HUDCC took action tocorrect the anomalous situa-
tion in 1996 under my coor
-dination, some 42 billion had been disbursed in mortgagesunder the Villar scheme. Only
a little more than 20 percent
of the loans were being repaid
by borrowers, more than 70
percent of the mortgages had been defaulted or were in seri-ous arrears.This drew the attention of the World Bank and the Dept.of Finance, for the SSS, GSIS,and Pag-Ibig Funds are retire-ment funds. The funds werecommitted to future retirementobligations to the contributingmembers. If the housing messcontinued, the SSS, GSIS, andPag-Ibig would default on itsretirement obligations, creat-
ing a nancial crisis for the
country.All of us who changedthe housing program to givethe control over their hous-ing funds back to the SSS,GSIS, and Pag-Ibig – theseagencies would be morecareful in screening mort-gages to make sure the bor-rowers would be paid for they would bear the penaltiesof mortgage defaults – wereall harassed by Villar and hisminions in the CREBA whoslapped law suits on us andattacked us in the radio, TV,newspapers, etc.The Makati regional trialcourt found the case in our favor and threw out the CRE-BA-Villar law suit. For a longwhile, we lost in the mediawars and were painted as anti- poor bureaucrats. But the furor eventually died down and thereformed housing program wefashioned has stood the test of
time. Since 1997, the repay
-ment rates of socialized andlow-cost housing mortgageshave remained high enoughto make the program sustain-
able. The looming nancial
crisis was averted and we arenow in better shape than theUS, which did nothing to re-form its own defective hous-ing mortgage system.Of course, the share pricesof C & P homes of Villar col-lapsed, for everyone knewthat the company was prof-itable only for as long as itcould bilk government funds.But then Villar found other rackets and the rest, as theysay, is history.3. Out-reaching to allother national media organi-zations, such as NUJP, PAPIand PPI, and forging closer alliances with provincial or community press organiza-tions -- the objective is toimprove the public relationsof the club before their eyes,which will, in turn, bring outa positive message to the public in general, and to beable to have a better chanceat achieving common goals.4. Instituting outreach programs to all college andhigh school journalists -- the purpose is to solidify positive belief in NPC as an organiza-tion of good and respectable journalists by showing actual proof that the public can seethrough the actual summits,conventions and seminars to be led or participated in bythe Club.5. Making bolder the ac-
tions in helping the ght for
justice for fallen journalists-- the purpose is the purposeis to help press for the wheelsof justice to keep on turning, particularly for those 32 whodied in the Ampatuan mas-sacre.
6. Making bolder the cam
- paign for the decriminaliza-tion of libel -- the purpose isto get a better chance of con-gressional approval of a newlaw making libel as a civilcase only with caps as to theamount of damages that can be sought by any plaintiff.7. Making bolder the cam- paign for the scrapping of right-of-reply bill -- the pur- pose is to keep the practiceof journalism from any ad-ditional repression schemes,intended or otherwise.These tasks are doable for the two-year term that I mayserve if I am given your man-date. I may add more pro-gram of actions as I continuemy campaign.In the meantime, I amrequesting you to give my plea your hard-and-longlook before deciding to voteand campaign with passionfor these causes to all NPCmembers you know.Should I win with or with-out your support, please con-sider this as my contract withyou that you can hold meresponsible later for breach,negligently or intently.Respectfully yours,Toto Causing
Add a Comment