Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Inter-enterprise relations in selected economic activities

Inter-enterprise relations in selected economic activities

Ratings: (0)|Views: 7 |Likes:
Published by dmaproiect
Enterprises view the impact of inter-enterprise relations on their competitiveness very favourably.
Enterprises view the impact of inter-enterprise relations on their competitiveness very favourably.

More info:

Published by: dmaproiect on Mar 30, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/30/2010

pdf

text

original

 
 
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%DE DK FI PT SE
Past 3 years Next 3 years
The importance of inter-enterprise relations is clearlyevident when looking at howenterprises perceive the impactof these relations in their coreactivity on the competitivenessof their enterprise.In the five Member States thattook part in the survey, between60 % and 70 % of enterprisesable to assess this impactanswer favourably, when askedto judge the impact on thecompetitiveness of theirbusiness over the last threeyears (Graph 1).Moreover, this share increases,when enterprises were askedwhat impact they expected overthe three years ahead.
*Inter-enterprise relations are relations between enterprises, excluding legal ownership and relationsarising from the normal purchase or sale of goods and services for immediate consumption. They coveroutsourcing for others, outsourcing for others, franchising, networking, licensing in, licensing out, jointventures, as well as non-permanent co-operation, but exclude relations between mother or holdingcompanies and their subsidiaries. This publication presents the first results of an ad hoc survey on theserelations, which was carried out in 2003.
Statistics
in focus
INDUSTRY, TRADE ANDSERVICES57/2007AuthorManfred SCHMIEMANN
Contents
Relations boost enterprises’competitiveness....................................1
 
Propensity of enterprises to have long-term relations with other enterprises.2
 
Types of inter-enterprise relation........3
 
Reasons for engaging in relations withother enterprises..................................4
 
Barriers to engaging in relations withother enterprises..................................5
 
Perceived impact of inter-enterpriserelations on competitiveness..............
6
 
Inter-enterprise relations inselected economic activities
Highlights
Enterprises view the impact of inter-enterprise relations* on theircompetitiveness very favourably: around two thirds of them expect theircompetitiveness to increase over the next three years thanks to theserelations.
The larger the enterprise, the more likely it is to have long-term relations.
Long-term relations are more likely in fuel processing and certainprofessional services, and less likely in hotels and restaurants and thedistributive trades.
‘Increased flexibility’ is the reason most often favoured for engaging inrelations with other enterprises.
Outsourcing to or for others, followed by short-term relations are themost popular types of inter-enterprise relation.
‘Availability of suitable business partners’ together with the ‘need orwillingness to remain independent’ are among the main barriers toforming relations.
Relations boost enterprises’ competitiveness
 
Globalisation and the advent of a knowledge-driven economy are encouragingenterprises to seek new ways of enhancing their competitiveness. Chiefamong these are long-term relations with other enterprises – such asoutsourcing or networking – both within their core activity or supportivefunctions such as sales and marketing or ICT.
Graph 1: Perceived positive impact of inter-enterprise relations on competitivenessin the past and next three years*
Source: Eurostat (SBS)*Share of enterprises that perceive a positive impact of inter-enterprise relations in their core activity on the competitiveness oftheir business, of the total number of enterprises able to assess thisimpact.
(
 
#
 
Manuscript completed on: 25.04.2007Data extracted on: 01.10.2006ISSN 1977-0316Catalogue number: KS-SF-07-057-EN-N © European Communities, 2007
 
 
2Statistics in focus
 —
Industry, trade and services
 —
57/2007 ____________________________________________  
#
0%20%40%60%
M'fac. of textiles and leathers (DB and DC)M'fac.of wood products, pulp, paper products;publish. and printing (DD and DE)Advertising (K744) and misc. bus. act.(K748)Architectural and engineering act. andconsultancy (K742)M'fac. of electrical and opticalequipment (DL)Fuel processing (DF)Legal, accounting, auditing, businessconsultancy and other activities (K741)M'fac. of chemicals and man-madefibres (DG)Research and development (K73)M'fac. of rubbers, plastics, and productsn.e.c. (DH and DN)Computer and related act. (K72)Transport, storage and communication (I)Wholesale and commission trade (G51)
Average
Motor trades (G50)Retail trade (G52)Hotels and restaurants (H)M'fac.of machinery and equipment (DK)M'fac. of transport equipment (DM)M'fac.of foods, bev. and tobac. (DA)Leasing of equipment and goods (K71)Construction (F)
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%DK DE FR PT FI SE
10-49 persons employed 50-249 persons employed250+ persons employed
Propensity of enterprises to have long-term relations with other enterprises
Graph 2: Propensity of enterprises to engage in at least onetype of long-term relation in their core activity, byemployment size class
Source: Eurostat (SBS)
 Engaging in long-term relations with other enterpriseswould seem to be more important or perhaps moreaccessible to larger enterprises (Graph 2). Theproportion of enterprises having at least one type oflong-term relation tends to increase with enterprisesize, with the smallest enterprise size class (between10 and 49 persons) always the one to display thelowest propensity. Denmark and Portugal present themost striking examples of this pattern with thepropensity of enterprises engaging in these relationsbeing around half as large in size class 10-49 as forthose in size class 250+.Apart from size class, the differences in importance ofthese relations for enterprises possibly stem from anumber of factors including longer existence on themarketplace, a greater propensity to outsource certainnon-core activities and the multiplication of relationsfollowing strategic alliances or mergers.The propensity of enterprises to engage in long-termrelations varies between economic activities. Asillustrated by the example of Germany in Graph 3,whereas an average of 12 % of enterprises have atleast one type of long-term relation, this percentagerises to as much as 50 % in fuel processing (NACEDF), and drops to as little as just over 3 % in hotelsand restaurants (H).The greater importance of long-term relations in fuelprocessing probably reflects the more permanentnature of the activity. In particular, in what is a sectorof great importance for the economy, it more thanlikely reflects the strategic partnerships necessary
Graph 3: Propensity of enterprises to engage in at least onetype of long-term relation in their core activity,selected economic sectors, Germany
 
Source: Eurostat (SBS)
to secure energy supplies, and in this connection alsothe sharing of infrastructure between enterprises(which would thus necessitate long-term relations).Moreover, fuel processing is also one of themanufacturing activities in which large enterprises(employing 250 persons or more) are most importantin terms of value added and employment, and whichaccounted for around five sixths of the sectoral totalsin 2003.By contrast, apart from a relatively small number oflarge hotel and restaurant chains or franchises, hotels
 
 
 ___________________________________________ 57/2007
 —
Industry, trade and services
 —
Statistics in focus3
#"
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%DEDKFIPTSE
Short-term relationsLicensing outFranchisingJoint venturesLicensing inNetworkingOutsourcing to othersOutsourcing for others
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Auxilairyservices *Core activityICT *R&DSales andmarketing
At least one long-term relationAt least one short-term relation
and restaurants tend most often to be small familybusinesses working for themselves. In effect, SMEs(enterprises employing between 1 and 249 persons)accounted for around four fifths of value added andemployment in the sector in 2003. Long-term relationswith other enterprises in their core activity wouldtherefore make little sense, except perhaps for instancessuch as overflow arrangements with other hotels or therecommendation of restaurants to guests for example.A closer look between the various economic activitiesreveals some thought-provoking patterns. Forinstance, enterprises in certain knowledge-intensiveactivities (notably computer activities and R&D)display a relatively high propensity to engage inrelations. By contrast, enterprises in all threewholesale and retail trade activities (G50 to G52)display a far lower propensity to engage in suchrelations, perhaps for reasons similar to the case ofhotels and restaurants.These patterns – including the high propensity for fuelprocessing and the low propensity for hotels andrestaurants – were generally repeated to varyingdegrees among the different countries surveyed, albeitwith some exceptions.
Types of inter-enterprise relation
Enterprises engage in different types of long-termrelation, according to criteria such as suitability ofrelation or availability of partners for the project athand. Of the seven types of long-term relationsurveyed (Graph 4), outsourcing (both to and forothers), is the most prevalent type in the five MemberStates participating in the survey. Among thesecountries, outsourcing is most popular in Portugal, andnotably outsourcing for others. Networking is the thirdmost frequent type of relation, which seems to be mostimportant in the Scandinavian countries. Other typesof relation are generally of minor importance, apartfrom joint ventures in France (data not shown) andlicensing in Germany.
Graph 4: Propensity of enterprises to engage in specificinter-enterprise relation types*, in their core activity
No data available for France. Source: Eurostat (SBS)*Note that this does not reflect the actual number of relations.
Graph 4 also shows the popularity of short-termrelations in each country, which are clearly the toprelation type for Danish enterprises, far ahead ofoutsourcing. To a lesser degree, short-term relationsare also more important than outsourcing for Germanenterprises.The importance of long-term relations varies accordingto core activity or supportive function (Graph 5). Ofthose enterprises with long- and short term relations,72 % of them have at least one type of long-termrelation in their core activity. However, when looking atthe various supportive functions, this share rangesfrom 73 % in auxiliary services to as little as 61 % insales and marketing.
Graph 5: Propensity of enterprises to engage in either long-term or short-term relations, by enterprise activity,average of available countries
* excluding France. Source: Eurostat (SBS)
That the core activity is the very livelihood of anenterprise could explain why long-term relations arerelatively popular: to risk the heart of one’s business inrelations with other enterprises requires trust andconfidence that are more likely to be built up with time.By contrast, when it comes to supportive functions, thegenerally lesser importance of long-term relations withother firms most probably reflects the fact that theseenterprise functions serve tasks or projects that are of

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->