Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
7Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
The Father of Torrens System in the Philippines

The Father of Torrens System in the Philippines

Ratings: (0)|Views: 87 |Likes:

More info:

Categories:Types, Business/Law
Published by: Engr. Stanlymer Mulet on Apr 01, 2010
Copyright:Public Domain

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/15/2010

pdf

text

original

 
ANG BAGONG LAHING PILIPINODEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION, INC.
www.blpfoundation.orgwww.blptorrensystem1858.comSEC Registration No. A 200200833-2002 as amended Art. II & III
Non-Government Organization
“THE FATHER OF TORRENS SYSTEM IN THE PHILIPPINES”
The
Torrens System
was introduced in the Philippines within the bounds of the
LandRegistration Act 496, Cadastral Act 2259
, which took effect on
February 1, 1903
, Thislaw was amended and superseded by
P.D. No. 1529
, which took effect on
June 11, 1978
,otherwise known as the
“Property Registration Decree”.Torrens Certificate of Title
A certificate of title is a mere evidence of ownership; it is not the title to the land itself asthe concept of title is conceived under our Civil Law;
“the certificate of title shall be atrue copy of the decree of registration”
(Sec. 39, P.D. 1529) 
DECLARATION OF PRINCIPLES AND STATE POLICIES(ARTICLE II)R.A. 3046
as Amended by:
R.A. 5446; P.D. No. 1596
and
P.D. No. 1599 Section3, Art XVII
.The state shall encourage Non-government, Community-based or Sectoral Organizationsthat promote the welfare of the nation. The state shall protect the right to health of thepeople and instill health consciousness among them, the state is mandated to promote ajust and dynamic social order that will ensure the prosperity and independence of the
NATION AND FREE THE PEOPLE FROM POVERTY.The Ang Bagong Lahing Filipino Development, Incorporated, is duly established andorganized and existing under Philippine law (Republic Act. 1459) with principal office at7426 EMF Bldg. Santillan St., Pio Del Pilar Makati City, with SEC. REGISTRATION No.2002200833-2002, (NGO)
Registered in the
National Library S.E.C. 178.6
, entitled
TORRENS SYSTEM PROCEEDING REGISTRATION OF REAL PROPERTY TITLES AND DEEDS
inrespect of letters, the copyright shall belong to the writer subject to the provisions of
Article 723
of the
Civil Code. (Sec. 6, P.D. No. 49a)
, on
August 3, 2004
with
RegistrationNo. A 2002-1375
and published in the tabloid newspaper,
Bulgar
(Boses ng Masa at Mata ngBayan),
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
dated
October 1, 2004, October 8, 2004,
and
October15, 2004. RESOLUTION No. 01 Series of 2003
published on the national and elitenewspapers Philippine Daily Inquirer on
February 16, 2003,
entitled
LAND FOR THE LANDLESS AND HOME FOR THE HOMELESS
on page 90, SEC. 9, VOL. 8 No. 70. (
 Machinecopy is hereto attached as “ÁNNEX” and made an integral part of this paragraph.)
That the above mentioned land is affirmed and confirmed by honorable
Supreme Court
inan
EN BANC DECISION under G.R. No. 103727 and G.R. No. 106496,
became final andimmediately executory,
promulgated December 18, 1996, and EN BANC Supreme CourtResolution dated 11th of July, 200; 30th January, 2001 and 5th March, 2002
withwarning:
“that no further pleadings will be entertained or the same land cannot beagain litigated in any future action at any court of justice in the Philippines.” (Id., Art.481) (
 Machine copy is hereto attached as “ÁNNEX” and made an integral part of this paragraph.)
Ozamiz Satellite Office: 129 Bito-on, Ozamiz City 7200, Misamis Occidental, PhilippinesMobile phone number:
+63 926 423 4313 (GLOBE) | +63 908 997 8835 (SMART)
 
ANG BAGONG LAHING PILIPINODEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION, INC.
www.blpfoundation.orgwww.blptorrensystem1858.comSEC Registration No. A 200200833-2002 as amended Art. II & III
Non-Government Organization
Under the consolation of original case
LRC/CIVIL Case No. 997-P into LRC/CIVIL CASE No.3957-P
has been submitted and impleaded. But we seek the truth and nothing but the truththat this Honorable Court has come to intervene where the succor of the Magistrate ofjustice for equity and vindication by the untainted facts and necessitate this providentialcircumstances in as much as its paramount objective to secure the weak and exalt thevictims of oppression for the unmolested true spirit of justice and its virtue for thedeserving litigants.(
 Machine copy is hereto attached as “ÁNNEX” and made an integral part of this paragraph.)
The Decision with Compromise Agreement, 7th Judicial District, Branch XXVIII, Pasay City,LRC/CIVIL CASE No. 3957-p, Presiding Judge Hon. Enrique A. Agana, a sworn statement that,it was known fact when both
LRC Commissioner Antonio Noblejas
and
Asst. CommissionerGregorio Bilog Jr. divulged the Modus Operandi
of the organized
syndicate in both LRCand in the Bureau of Lands
then to defeat the interest of the herein land owners, whichwere an admission of these land authority that the eligible land records and documents ofthe
OCT No. T-01-4, TCT No. T-408,
and
TCT No. T-498
had been subjected tomanipulation, alteration falsification orchestrated by no other than in the
LRC and theBureau of Lands in connivance by those in the Register of Deeds.
(Machine copy ishereto attached as “ÁNNEX” and made an integral part of this paragraph.) DWCA P.80 con.
Register of Deed
created a vacuum which is another basis of the land grabbers toproliferate their unlawful activities upon raping the veto of the country’s
Torrens System
by way of mass production of
invalid Land Titles
for continues cycles of scam to the finalprejudice of the government and the general public.
(Machine copy is hereto attached as“ÁNNEX” and made an integral part of this paragraph.) DWCA P. 80
If we refresh our idea for the truth over the land in question based on the governmentposition paper and its evidences, ultimately, we could assess the veracity of ownership oversaid land of a person who has better rights and interest over the subject matter. Indeed,concretely rectified upon the
creation of the Supreme Court in 1580. Paragraph K 
of thegovernment Possession Paper manifested with
Supreme Court Chief Justice Hon. Jose P.Laurel
dissenting opinion, it declared all
Presidential Proclamations, Executive Orders,Letters of Instructions and Decree
of any purpose or purposes
had no force and effectover real properties
covered by
TORRENS TITLE
for and in the name of private person inthe absence of just compensation.
(Machine copy is hereto attached as “ÁNNEX” and made an integral part of this paragraph.) DWCA pg. 49, 57, 58, 73
The Torrens System in the Philippines is judicial in form but administrative in character.
“Judicial proceedings for the registration of land throughout the Philippines shall bein rem and shall be based on he generally accepted principles underlying the TorrensSystem
(Sec. 2, P.D. 1529). In connection with Section 108 of P.D. 1529, Act No. 141, itis conclusive upon the whole world including the government.
Because all land to whichclaimants have acquired imperfect or incomplete title within the contemplation of
Section48 of Commonwealth Act No. 141
--------
Most of the land now occupied or possessed bythe people throughout the Philippines are not covered by titles issued by theGovernment.
 
(Machine copy is hereto attached as “ÁNNEX” and made an integral partof this paragraph.)
Ozamiz Satellite Office: 129 Bito-on, Ozamiz City 7200, Misamis Occidental, PhilippinesMobile phone number:
+63 926 423 4313 (GLOBE) | +63 908 997 8835 (SMART)
 
ANG BAGONG LAHING PILIPINODEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION, INC.
www.blpfoundation.orgwww.blptorrensystem1858.comSEC Registration No. A 200200833-2002 as amended Art. II & III
Non-Government Organization
Besides, based on agreement predicted by this
Decision with Compromise Agreement,
theissue as to the legality of ownership of the American government over the subject land waswhether or not said land is lawful to be inherited by the Philippine government from theU.S. government. Certainly, based on the
evidences and circumstances,
the ownership ofthe Philippine Republic and its government over the subject noble lands was void and
unconstitutional
even if the basis was a
Philippine Constitution of 1935
but neither the
Malolos Constitution could warrant the legality
of Philippine government ownership overthe said land o
n the reason that U.S. government acquired unlawful right
over the land,the same,
it thwarted the EVIL interest
of the Republic of the Philippines over the subjectlands.
(Machine copy is hereto attached as “ÁNNEX” and made an integral part of this paragraph.) DWCA pg. 51
The sworn testimonials of
NBI Director Jolly Bugarin
before the
Senate Blue RibbonCommittee
headed by the
Ex-Senate President Gil Puyat
and made as integral portion ofthe government Position Paper divulging several
Modus Operandi
of those in the
LRC-BUREAU of LAND
before in conspiracy of those influential group in the government in the
massive issuance of fake land titles
in favor of the l
and grabbers and oligarch real estatedevelopers
as they were benefited by
those who could pay lucrative sum.
The ModusOperandi is as follows: The grand design, land grabbing of the
LRC-BUREAU OF LANDS
inconspiracy with their cohorts – real state Developers has caused the root of some
20 millionfake and titles
over the subject lands under the following procedures;
(Machine copy ishereto attached as “ÁNNEX” and made an integral part of this paragraph)By possession of the land since time immemorial
.-Occupant of lands who, by themselvesand their predecessors-in-interest, have been in possession of the land since timeimmemorial. Their possession of the land for such length of time justifies the
presumption
 
that the land had never been part of the public domain and that it had been privateproperty even before Spanish conquest.
 
(Republic vs. Court of Appeals, 335 SCRA 693;see also Oh Cho vs. Director of Lands, 75 Phil. 890; Nelayan vs. Nelayan, 109 Phil. 183;Manarpaac vs. Cabauatan, 21 SCRA 743)
(Machine copy is hereto attached as “ÁNNEX”and made an integral part of this paragraph.)
Therefore, the Government according to the LRC Commissioner Antonio M. Noblejas. Can itbe that the government a direct source of fraudulent evidences? Besides the legalownership rights of the private person heirs are fully supported by strong evidences ofownership over the land adapting the evidences of the Republic of the Philippines but theclaim for ownership by the government and that the paragraph I of the government PositionPaper over the same subject land has been strongly opposed under the principle of
PRIUS
 
TEMPORE PORTIUR JURI
by the Private N.G.O. considering that no less than the
AMICUS
 
CURAE
and this court were the ones that confirmed the legitimacy and the physicalevidence of the said land owners, besides, the alleged expropriation by the governmentover the subject land in favor of the legal owners. Therefore, the government should bebarred by statute of Limitation and/or Estopel for public interest, since people demandhonest services from the government.
Because the government never possessed saidbetter ownership and legal rights over the land
than what the heirs have in as much as
 
the legal heirs remained physically fit, alive and kicking and controverting strongly thedeceptive allegation of the Republic of the Philippines that the owners and heirs over thesubject land were dead and no survivor to claim it so it should necessarily be reverted to
Ozamiz Satellite Office: 129 Bito-on, Ozamiz City 7200, Misamis Occidental, PhilippinesMobile phone number:
+63 926 423 4313 (GLOBE) | +63 908 997 8835 (SMART)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->