Margaret J. Jack Page
3
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.NDA #21-455, 21-858, 20-896, BLA 103964MACMIS #17318
By omitting the most serious and frequently occurring risks associated with the drugspromoted in the links above, the sponsored links misleadingly suggest that Boniva, Pegasysand Xeloda are safer than has been demonstrated. We note that these sponsored linkscontain a link to the products’ websites. However, this is insufficient to mitigate themisleading omission of risk information from these promotional materials.
Inadequate Communication of Indication
The sponsored links for Pegasys and Xeloda provide very brief statements about what thedrugs are for; however, these statements are incomplete and misleading, suggesting that thedrugs are useful in a broader range of conditions or patients than has been demonstrated bysubstantial evidence or substantial clinical experience.Specifically, the sponsored link for Pegasys misleadingly broadens the indication for Pegasysby implying that all patients with hepatitis C are candidates for Pegasys therapy (“LearnAbout PEGASYS & Hepatitis C…”), when this is not the case. Rather, Pegasys is onlyindicated (alone or in combination) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection inadults who have compensated liver disease and who have not been treated with interferonalpha previously.Similarly, the sponsored link for Xeloda misleadingly broadens the indication for Xeloda byimplying that the drug is approved to treat any type of colon cancer (“Learn About An OralChemotherapy Treatment For Colon Cancer”), when this is not the case. Rather, Xeloda’sindication is limited to adjuvant treatment in patients with
Duke’s C colon cancer
and asfirst-line treatment for
metastatic colorectal carcinoma
. Furthermore, the sponsored linkfails to communicate any of the limitations to either of these indications or the drug’s limitedproven survival benefits.
Failure to Use Required Established Name
The sponsored links for Pegasys and Xeloda fail to present the full established name of thedrugs being promoted, despite the requirement to do so.
See
21 CFR 201.10(g)(1) &202.1(b)(1).
Conclusions and Requested Action
For the reasons discussed above, the sponsored links misbrand Boniva, Pegasys andXeloda, in violation of the Act and FDA regulations.
See
21 U.S.C. 352(a) & (n), 321(n); 21CFR 201.10(g)(1), 202.1(b)(1), (e)(3)(i), (ii) & (e)(6)(i).DDMAC requests that Hoffmann-La Roche immediately cease the dissemination of violativepromotional materials for Boniva, Pegasys and Xeloda, such as those described above.Please submit a written response to this letter on or before April 9, 2009, stating whether youintend to comply with this request, listing all promotional materials (with the 2253 submissiondate) in use for these drugs as of the date of this letter, identifying which of these materialscontain violations such as those described above, and explaining your plan for discontinuinguse of such materials. Finally, we encourage you to review your promotional materials for the
Add a Comment