Facts in Verification Fraud Upon Court OccurredThe entire proceedings (past and present) has been corrupted
. Even the stipulations the courtwent by to order the past eviction of plaintiff is a product of material misrepresentations by hisown attorneys to support the opposition¶s legal agenda. Consequently, plaintiff is complaininghis rights to a fair trial have been usurped not only by the opposition, but by theoutrageousmisconduct of his own attorneys. Since they worked hand and hand to ensure the legaland business agenda of the opposition were affirmed; albeit based on coercion, fraud and deceit."Fraud on the court" consists of conduct: (1) on part of officer of the court, (2) that isdirected to judicial machinery itself, (3) that is intentionally false, willfully blind to thetruth, or is in reckless disregard for the truth, that is positive averment or is concealmentwhen one is under duty to disclose, that deceives court. (
Demjanjuk v. Petrovsky
, 10 F.3d338, rehearing and suggestion for rehearing denied, certiorari denied
Rison v. Demjanjuk,
115 S.Ct. 295, 513 U.S. 914, 130 L.Ed.2d 205 (Ohio) 1993.²Fed CivProc 2654.
´. ..errors are so prejudicial and fundamental that expenditure of further time andexpense would be wasteful, if not futile.µ (
Salvatore v. State of Florida,
366 So. 2d745 [Fla. 1978],
444 U.S. 885, 100 S. Ct. 177, 62 L. Ed. 2d 115 ).
Fraud on the Court
by the opposition¶s lawyer, Kaelin and Philips,and even by the four lawyers plaintiff hiredacted to circumvent him from obtaining fair hearings in a court of law.-
Judges denied plaintiff from receiving due process of law
in the Norwalk Housing Court.This is where the offending Judges,Heckley, Grogins, and Moore, as officials of stategovernment must respect all of the legal rights guaranteed by the constitution is owed to citizens.Particularly under the Fourteenth Amendment that states: