Building an Infrastructure for AODV Prevention
1
Te environmental managementapproach to alcohol and other drugabuse and violence (AODV) preven-tion is based on the principle thatcollege students’ conduct can beshaped through concerted eorts toreengineer the environment thatshapes their behavior.
1
Constructing acampus, community, and state-levelenvironment that will protect studentsand help them make healthier andsaer decisions is challenging work, which requires an organized andparticipatory process to develop,implement, and evaluate a soundstrategic plan.
2
Tis process includes three types o participatory eorts.
3
On
campus
, thecollege president or chancellor canbegin by appointing a permanenttask orce that represents severalimportant constituencies, includingkey administrative sta, aculty, andstudents, and possibly alumni andparents. o guide
community-level
eorts, the task orce can collaborate with, or evolve into, a ull coalitionthat includes both campus and civicleaders. Finally, work at the
state level
can be acilitated by a statewideassociation o academic, community,and state prevention leaders.Tis publication outlines how campusofcials can organize and work collaboratively with campus andcommunity coalitions and withstatewide initiatives to accomplishtheir AODV prevention goals.
Building an Infrastructure for AODV Prevention
Coalitions and Statewide Initiatives
by William DeJong, Ph.D.
Community-level Coalitions
Prevention work in the community surrounding a campus is best acilitatedby a campus and community coalition.Te main purpose o a campus andcommunity coalition is to direct andoversee the design and execution o astrategic plan. Some coalitions aredirectly involved in putting theseprograms and policies into operation, while others act as catalysts or identiy-ing community needs, selecting ordesigning initiatives, and mobilizingcampus and community support.
4
Both the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) ask Force on College Drinking
5
and theNational Academies
6
have endorsedcampus and community coalitionsas the primary vehicle or pursuingcommunity-level prevention work. Insome locales, campus ofcials will beable to join an existing coalition, but where no such organization is in place,top academic administrators can takethe lead in beginning one, perhapsbuilding rom a campus task orce.
Evaluations of Campus andCommunity Coalitions
Recent evaluations have shown thatmobilizing a campus and community coalition can oster successul preven-tion eorts.In 2005, the Bellingham–Western Washington University CampusCommunity Coalition launched itsNeighborhoods Engaging with Students(NES) project to decrease disruptiveo-campus parties.
7
Enorcementinterventions, all heavily publicized,included additional police patrols intargeted neighborhoods and increasedcompliance checks at both on- ando-premise alcohol retailers nearcampus. A Web site and a series o neighborhood orums educated studentsregarding their rights and responsibilitiesas community residents. NES alsoeatured a neighborhood mediationprogram to help settle disputes involvingstudents. At the same time, Western Washington University boosted itslate-night programming on campus,especially or underage, rst-yearstudents. A second public university in Washington created a similar program.Student surveys showed that theprevalence o heavy episodic drinking was lower at these two interventionschools than at a third comparisonuniversity.Te University o Rhode Island’scoalition experience was mixed.
8
In2000, university ofcials joined withtown leaders to orm the Narragansett–URI Coalition, a monthly orum oraddressing alcohol-impaired driving,student parties, and other o-campusproblems. In short order, the coalitiondeveloped a model lease with explicitpenalties or police incidents; set up asystem to notiy absentee landlords