Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Despite the needs of a growing and ageing population, local authority spending on adult social care has not
increased in the 2010 financial year. Can Government continue to service the UK’s social care needs under current
economic conditions? With mounting pressure on services, jobs and prices, domiciliary care providers are having
to be more discerning about which areas of the market to focus on. Moreover, they are having to change not only
their internal procedures, but their business models too, in order to successfully deal with schemes such as call
monitoring, direct payments and individual budgets.
The ongoing trend for LAs to contract out services has allowed the independent market to show modest growth.
This is set to continue as the Government expands its social care commitments; however an increasing share of
the services will go to those with the highest levels of need. In addition, a greater proportion of people are being
cared for in their own homes.
Right now the industry is highly fragmented, and the race to be one of the leading companies over the next five
years is still wide open.
Cairneagle has surveyed 81 local authorities regarding their provision of adult social care. Our findings reveal the
state of the market in 2009*.
Key findings:
If you would like to discuss any of these findings, please contact Matt Cooksley at matt.cooksley@cairneagle.com
or 0207 036 9403.
* The survey was carried out for the financial years to March 2008, March 2009, and the half year to September 2009.
Cairneagle Associates LLP
Victory House, 99-101 Regent Street, London W1B 4RS
Telephone: +44 ( 0 ) 20 7036 9400
Facsimile: +44 ( 0 ) 20 7036 9425
A Limited Liability Partnership Registered in England and Wales
Partnership No. OC302340 Registered Office as above
6%
Nursing care £1.0B LD
4%
£1.4B
1%
MH
6%
Residential care £2.3B
-1% FY10 Budget
S. accommodation OP
£0.2B 0%
FY10 H1 (Annualised)
OP MH LD PD 1%
Total
1%
Note: Area represents expenditure
Source: The NHS Information Centre
• While the total spend on independent providers grew
• The survey covers local authority spending on older in line with inflation in H1, the increasing demand for
people (OP), learning disabilities (LD), physical LD and MH has meant that expenditure on older
disabilities (PD) and mental health (MH) people is falling
• Spending is broken down into: homecare, direct • Outsourced expenditure on older people declined in
payments (DP), nursing care placements, residential H1 by 0.3%, while the budgets for FY2010 imply a
care placements, supported accommodation, individual 1% decline
budgets (IB) • Total expenditure on independents across all segments
• The services are provided either by the local authorities was slightly higher than budgeted for, and the 1%
(LAs) themselves or outsourced to independent growth was above that of the total spend including
providers LA-provided services
• The survey also covers the use of call monitoring (CM)
and spot and block contracts The independent homecare market is
growing at 6% per year at the expense of
Total LA spending on social care for older nursing and residential homes
people fell by 2% in H1 4. Growth in expenditure on independents
2. Expenditure growth by segment
5%
Homecare and DP
FY10 Budget 6%
-3%
PD
-1% FY10 H1 (Annualised) 1%
Nursing care
-3%
5%
LD
5% -1%
Residential care
1%
2%
MH
5% FY10 Budget
FY10 H1 (Annualised)
-3%
OP
-2%
• In the first half of the year spending on independent
Total
0% providers of homecare increased by 6%, slightly above
0% budget expectations
• This growth is coming at the expense of nursing and
• Just over 50% of local authorities cut their budgets and residential care, a continuation of a long-standing
almost 60% cut spending in H1 trend
• LAs budgeted for a 3% reduction in spend on older
people
• Almost 20% of local authorities cut their spending on
older people by more than 10%
• Spending on LD and MH is growing by 5%
Page 2 of 4
LAs are continuing to outsource more of The price of homecare services grew above
their homecare services the rate of inflation
5. Expenditure on homecare and direct payments by 7. Average price of homecare services
provider
Price (£/hour)
12
Independent 68% 70% +6% CAGR
11 Direct Payments
3.3% CAGR
10
FY09 FY10 H1 FY09 FY10 H1
(Annualised)
• There is a continued trend towards outsourcing in • Direct payment prices are 21% lower than block
homecare and direct payments with expenditure on contract homecare prices
independents growing at 6% whilst expenditure on • Historically prices increase in line with inflation
local authority provision declined by 4% in H1 however there are concerns over price squeezes as LA
• We expect this trend to continue for the next five budgets come under pressure. Given the low inflation
years, after which the market will go ex-growth this year, pricing in FY10 increased in real terms
• However, the increased share of direct payments will
The number of people with learning have suppressed the average price growth across the
disabilities receiving LA funding is growing market
at 6%
H1 has witnessed a significant increase in
6. Number of adults with learning disabilities
receiving care the use of direct payments
+6%
CAGR 8. Direct payment vs. homecare expenditure on
2% -10% independent providers
Nursing care 2%
CAGR
34% 1%
Residential care 36% Direct
27% 33% 31%
payments
Supported 20% 8%
20%
accommodation
FY08 FY09
• The number receiving care was up 6% in FY09
• There is a shift away from residential and nursing care
to domiciliary care with the number receiving FY09 FY10 H1
homecare and direct payments growing by 11%, the (Annualised)
number in supported accommodation increasing by • In H1 10 expenditure on independent providers via
8% direct payments grew by 31% whilst non-direct
• With Government policy aiming to increase the share payment homecare expenditure shrank by 3%
of spending on LD, close down LD institutions, and • Given the low average pricing for DP, this will
lower eligibility criteria, the growth in the LD suppress margins
homecare market is set to continue
• This trend is negative for the larger companies who
rely on winning large block contracts, and provides
opportunities for more nimble operators with efficient
sales targeting and marketing operations
Page 3 of 4
• DP take-up is, unsurprisingly, lowest among older more transparent, the increased use of call monitoring
people, accounting for 9% of the volume relative to has the potential to suppress revenues as well as the
non-DP homecare appetite for carers to work
• Take-up is far higher among those with learning • Companies must ensure that procedures, IT systems,
disabilities, mental health needs and physical and carer training are all aligned to minimise the
disabilities as they have much larger budgets and a potential negative impacts
greater range of needs
Block contracts account for only a third of
The use of individual budgets grew by 160% the total hours provided
relative to homecare, DP and supported 11. H1 FY10 homecare hours split between spot and
accommodation block contracts
9. The number of people with individual budgets
relative to the number receiving homecare, DP and
supported accommodation Block
32%
9%
Spot
68%
4%
44%
CM 25%
FY09 FY10
• The number of local authorities who have
implemented call monitoring grew by 66% in FY10
• Of those local authorities currently implementing call
monitoring, 83% of hours are provided under call
monitoring
• Given that call monitoring makes the homecare service
Page 4 of 4