Professional Documents
Culture Documents
February 2, 2016
Mr. Andrew Longey
Principal
Enfield High School
1264 Enfield Street
Enfield, CT 06082
Via email: alongey@enfieldschools.org
a parent has no right to tell a public school what his or her child will and will not be taught, Leebaert v.
Harrington, 332 F.3d 134, 141 (2d Cir. 2003), or to direct how a public school teaches their child. Blau v.
Fort Thomas Public School District, et al, 401 F.3d 381, 395 (6th Cir. 2005). See also Parker v. Hurley, 514 F.
3d 87, 102 (1st Cir., 2008). Any attempt to eliminate everything that is objectionablewill leave public
schools in shreds. Nothing but educational confusion and a discrediting of the public school system can
result McCollum v. Board of Education, 332 U.S. 203 (1948) (Jackson, J. concurring).
Every community is home to a diversity of opinions on moral, religious, and sexual questions. No matter how
strong the views of some members of the community may be, however, they have no right to impose their
views on others, or expect the public schools to reflect their beliefs at the expense of others. Cancelling
American Idiot because of a few complaints impermissibly privileges the beliefs of some individuals over
others and is likely to make the district susceptible to many other complaints demanding the cancellation of
plays and the removal of books.
We recommend that in order to protect the school from such complaints in the future, you initiate clear
procedures that utilize Enfield School Districts Policy 6163.1 for The Selection of Education Resources,
which bases its language on the School Library Bill of Rights and is intended for all educational resources in
the schools. Policy 6163.1a, Challenges to the Use of Educational Resources, states that No parent nor
group of parents has the right to negate the use of educational resources for students other than his/her own
child.
It appears that, aside from the complaints of parents, there were a number of other problems accompanying the
production, which all point at the need for Enfield High School to clarify its procedures for selecting theatrical
productions. Superintendent Schumann is quoted in the Courant saying that auditions were posted throughout
the schoolbefore school staff met to finalize plans for the spring production. It is not clear if established
practice has been for school administrators to review theatrical material before notice goes out to students, but
any administrative review should be done well before an announcement is made about a production. In any
such review, we recommend that deference be given to educators who can best ensure that the material is
suited to the grade and maturity level of the participating students. Procedures should also ensure that any
changes to the script of a play or musical be approved by the publisher or licensing company before the
production is announced to students.
Clarifying procedures for theatrical productions moving forward is imperative to safeguard the artistic and
intellectual freedom of students and educators. Further suggestions for district policies can be found via the
Educational Theatre Association:
https://www.schooltheatre.org/advocacy/local/freedomexpression/specimendistrictpoliciesonplayselection
We hope Enfield High School clarifies it procedures and decides to move forward with its production of
American Idiot in the future, either in its unedited form or with edits approved by the publisher. As one current
student and former Lamplighter said on Facebook, If we put this play on, it would prove how we, the people
of Enfield High, have a voice and we are not just children you see in the halls.
Please do not hesitate to contact us if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,