Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
 
OREGON MIDDLE SCHOOL
OMS Weekly Staff E-Newsletter 2010_04_12
The Complexities of Motivation:The Uncertainty of PredictingBehaviorsPart III - Dr. Robert Brooks
In my past two articles I have addressed thetheme of motivation, drawing from DanielPink’s thought-provoking new book Drive:The Surprising Truth About What MotivatesUs. Based on the large number of responses Ihave received to these articles it is obviousthat this theme is of significant interest to parents and professionals alike. Prior tosharing some new thoughts, a quick review of several key points from the previous articlesis warranted.Pink highlights the work of a number of researchers, including psychologists EdwardDeci and Richard Ryan at the University of Rochester in New York. Deci and Ryan havecontributed significantly to our understandingof the differences between extrinsic motivation(i.e., motivation based on external rewards and punishments that may lead to a feeling of beingcontrolled) and intrinsic motivation (i.e.,motivation based on what Deci terms“authenticity and responsibility” and a feeling of having choice). Pink introduces the label
The Motivation 2.0 Operating System
,” asystem that is predicated on the belief that theways in which we encourage people to do whatwe want isto reward them for the behavior weseek and punish them for behavior we do notwant to appear. In contrast to the principles of Motivation 2.0 is the self-determination theory(SDT) advanced by Deci and Ryan in whichthey contend there are three basic, innate, psychological needs that we all possess: theneed to belong or feel connected, the need tofeel competent, and the need for autonomy or self-determination. Pink writes, “When thoseneeds are satisfied, we’re motivated, productive, and happy. When they’re thwarted,our motivation, productivity, and happiness plummet.”Pink adds, “Human beings have an innate driveto be autonomous, self-determined, andconnected to one another. And when that driveis liberated, people achieve more and live richer lives.”
The Limitations of Motivation 2.0
Several of the questions I received in responseto my first article in this three-part series asked
O
 
REGON 
M
 
IDDLE 
S
 
CHOOL
C
itizenship,
 A
ttitude,
R
esponsibility,
E
xcellence
The
 
of Oregon Middle School is to develop conscientious citizens, foster positiveattitudes, respect and appreciate individuals, and achieve academic excellence.
OMS 2009-2010 Goals
 (4Cs)
“Sharpening Your 
Skill 
Saw”
Panther “
 props” 
to:
 Wendy Buehl and MelissaMader
Three Cups of Tea Community Kick off on Tuesday, 4/6/2010at OMS 
Lynda Graber
Organizing theOMS  Newsletter and the gentlereminders to turn in articles
Multi-Cultural Club- Amy 
 Survey and presentation on Bullying and Harassing ( 7thGr and 8th Gr 
 
 )
 Remember not only to saythe right thing in the right  place, but far more difficult  still, to leave unsaid thewrong thing at the tempting moment.
--
Benjamin Franklin
 
OREGON MIDDLE SCHOOL
2
OMS Weekly Staff E-Newsletter 2010_04_12
if the application of Motivation 2.0 principlesis ever indicated. I noted in last month’sarticle that it was, but in a much more limitedway than many may believe. Pink concurs,“Carr ots and sticksaren’t all bad. If they were,Motivation 2.0 would never have flourished so long or accomplished so much. While an operating system centered around rewards and punishmentshas outlived its usefulness and badly needs an upgrade, thisdoesn’t mean we should scrap its every piece.”Pink adds, “For routine tasks, which aren’t veryinteresting and don’t demand much creativethinking, rewards can provide a smallmotivational booster shot without the harmfulside effects. In some ways, that’s just commonsense.” In capturing the limitations of Motivation2.0, Deci, Ryan, and Richard Koestner posit,“Rewards do not undermine people’s intrinsicmotivation for dull tasks because there is little or no intrinsic motivation to be undermined.” DanAriely, author of Predictably Irrational, found thatwhen a task required “even rudimentary cognitiveskill, a larger reward led to poorer performance.As long as the task involved only mechanicalskill, bonuses worked as they would be expected:the higher the pay, the better the performance.”
Creating “Motivating Environments”: Type Ivs. Type X Behaviors
Whenever Motivation 2.0 or the carrot and stick approach is employed, one must ask if analternative practice would be mor e likely tonurture what I have called a “motivatingenvironment,” that is, an environment in whichthose involved are eager to participate andcooperate —not because of external rewards or  punishments but based on intrinsic motivation.Pink expands upon his views of Motivation 2.0 by introducing the concepts of Type I and Type X behaviors. He explains:The Motivation 2.0 operating system dependedon, and fostered, what I call Type X behavior.Type X behavior is fueled more by extrinsicdesires than intrinsic ones. It concerns itself lesswith the inherent satisfaction of an activity andmore with the external rewards to which thatactivity leads. The Motivation 3.0 operatingsystem—the upgrade that’s needed to meet the
RESOURCE LINKS
OMS Staff Only PageOMS Staff Collaboration SiteOMS online DB (Refocus, etc)OMSPBIS SiteOMSLiteracy SiteOMSPLC Site
GOOGLE CALENDARS
OMS Orange Black and Other Calendar OMS Field Trip Calendar 
FORMS
 
 NEW Online Behavior Inter vention Form NEW ONLINE CADs
Sub Evaluation FormOMS Field Trip Request FormGuest Speaker Request FormTeamMeeting form (Google Doc)VideoUse Permission FormOMSCommittee Meeting TemplateOMSProtocol Documentation For m toFacilitate positive dialog (PDF)OMS Protocol Documentation form(Word format)OMS Team Minutes InteractiveForm- fill in fields and click submit on bottom of Staff Page
SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES
 
Resource Links for OMS Staff 
Upcoming Events
April 2010 - CARE Review
Classroomand Arrival Departure Expectations
12
 
Orange
 Day-
Everyone Reads
Homebase3 cupsof tea questions discussion OMS Staff Climate Survey Starts  OPTIONALStaff Meeting  
13
 
Day- 3 Cups of Tea Day5 Tornado Drill practice (see h/o fromstaff meeting EXTENDED HBSchedule 
 BUS- Andy, Cassidy, Rick*
14
 
Orange
 Day 
No Homebase - No Bells AlternateSchedule
 BET meeting3:20Fine Arts week - 1:40 Assembly 
 BUS- Andy, Cassidy, Rick*
15
 
Black 
Day- 3 Cups of Tea Day 6Literacy Committee AMPBIS Committee AM 
 BUS-Andy, Cassidy, Rick*
16
 
Orange
 Day - 
 BUS -Andy, Cassidy, Rick*
OMS Weekly Update(Bus Duty,Co-Curricular - Lnda G
 
Did you Know?
You can review the OMS Goal Report with alltypes of data for your enjoyment?Go to theOMS Moodle Site to view themOMS 0910 Committee Membership***IPod/MP3 Survey R esults Here
 
Reminders
Board Paper on OSD Site
 Wiki SpacesOn NingOn Moodle
 
OMS Vision
OREGONMIDDLE SCHOOLVISION
 I 
ndividualizing learning for parents, studentsand staff 
 N 
 S 
haring responsibility for success of all students
 P 
 I 
 R
eflecting and collaborating for continuousimprovement
 E 
ngaging students in rigorous learningnew realities of how we organize, think about,and do what we do—depends on what I callType I behavior. Type I behavior is fueled more by intrinsic desiresthan extrinsic ones. It concerns itself less with the externalfaction of  the activity itself. . .. If we want to strengthen our organizations, get beyond our decade of underachievement, and address the inchoate sensethat something is wr ong in our  businesses, our lives, and our world, we need tomove more from Type X to Type I.Subscribing to but modifying to some extentthe three basic needs... (click here for more)
OMS Belief Statements
OREGONMIDDLESCHOOL BELIEFSTATEMENTS
We believe
students will develop respectfor their community, environment, and themselves.
We believe
We believe
all staff, students andcommunity will be respectful andresponsible.
We believe
all staff will model life-longlearning and engage students in highlevels of academic excellence.
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
  • Notes
    Load more