Professional Documents
Culture Documents
We have reviewed and analysed the activity of candidates who we consider have a genuine chance of
winning their seat, and have looked at how prepared they are to campaign online for the election.
This included a review of websites, blogs, Twitter and Facebook accounts.
Inevitably, the three major parties have been battling each other to gain the supremacy online and have
been developing some highly sophisticated software and online campaigning techniques. However, relatively
little has been assessed about how individual candidates are using online platforms to help enhance their
campaigns in constituencies across the UK.
Our research took place throughout February 2010 and has provided a thorough audit of presence and
activity levels online. The results clearly indicate that discussion surrounding the prominence and potential
impact of social media platforms is often both over-stated and exaggerated.
Summary of results
This election will not be decided online. While the use of social media by the national parties, the press and the
general public will have an impact on the election, our research shows there is little widespread and effective take
up of online campaigning by individual candidates across the country.
No party has yet managed to implement a consistent online strategy at candidate level, and we found very few
constituencies where one or other of the candidates is dominating in any noteworthy way.
Key conclusions
• Some candidates still have little or no online presence
Incredibly, there are a number of candidates in our sample that still have no online presence, including 10% that have
no personal website.
• Central parties use of new media has not filtered down consistently to candidates
While the three main parties are all bidding to outdo each other, with online draft manifestos and iPhone
applications, as well as appointing ‘Twitter Tsars’ and the like, uptake from candidates on the ground is often at the
most basic level.
Key findings
10% of candidates still have no personal website
54% of websites have no links to candidate’s social networking platforms.
29% of candidates use a blog
Top 10 most followed candidates on Twitter account for 52.6% of the total number of followers
Top 10 most popular Facebook pages account for 84% of total Facebook supporters and fans
3. Sample
The sample of 100 seats was chosen by the Get Elected team to represent a broad range of likely key
constituencies at the next general election.
Drawing on and acknowledging the excellent insight offered by UK Polling Report, we have developed a
sample that incorporates most key marginal seats, while not remaining exclusive to them. We have also
included other seats that we consider interesting for other reasons, namely those with high profile
independent candidates, recent by-election or possible Portillo-esque decapitations.
For each seat, unless a three-way marginal or where a party leader is standing, we have only reviewed the
online presence of the two candidates which, based on notional and previous figures, have the best chance
of claiming victory.
We have chosen exclusively to focus on a candidate’s website and blogging activity, combined with the
largest two social media platforms, Facebook and Twitter.
Over the 100 seats we reviewed the online presence of 233 candidates
2 Green 1 Speaker
For more information about the sample, or for a full list of the 100 seats, please contact
james.knight@getelected.co.uk
4. Full Results
Campaigning websites
Lack of presence
A staggering 10% have no personal website, with another 2% unavailable or under construction. Of
those that do have a website, only 29% have a blog. Furthermore, these are not just candidates that have
been selected recently, but sitting MPs and some that have been in position for a number of years.
Low interaction
Using our ranking scale of 1-3 our findings point to low overall scores across all parties in terms of levels of
interaction with the user and regularity of website updates. On average, the candidates were marked a
fairly derogatory 1.4 for interaction, and 1.7 for regularity.
Lack of linkages
The majority of websites were also not coordinated in their online campaigning, with 54% having no link to
other online platforms. Further to this, our research found some instances of meaningless links to social
media sites, pointing users to the Facebook homepage for example, or to a dormant Twitter page.
Twitter
Lib Dem candidates embracing Twitter
45% of the total sample has some presence on Twitter. 50% of Lib Dems candidates had an account, just
ahead of the Conservatives on 48%, with Labour having only 38% of their candidates being active on the
platform.
The total number of followers for the 105 candidates on Twitter was 64,572 (not unique followers), with
an average of 614 per candidate.
The total number of followers for each party was 24,105 for Labour, 14,525 for the Lib Dems and
8,447 for the Conservatives. The average following was 804 for Labour, 537 for the Lib Dems and 206
for the Conservatives.
1
Total follower figures are not unique. We appreciate there will be much duplication across Twitter accounts and users. However, this
gives a strong enough indication of direction of travel for conclusions to be drawn.
Average Twitter followers by party
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
Labour Lib Dems Conservative
2
Nick Clegg accounts for almost a third of total Liberal Democrat followers in our sample. To ensure direct comparison (as neither
Gordon Brown nor David Cameron are on Twitter) and to keep the focus on candidates rather than high profile party figures, we have
excluded Nick Clegg from this specific calculation.
Most followed Twitter users
67% of all followers come from just 17% of the candidates. Conversely, 72% of the candidates combine to
account for only 17% of the total followers.
Average followers
account for
14.6% of followers
Of course there are huge variants in the size of UK constituencies and the regional use of Twitter, yet it
seems fairly striking that only 3 out of 233, or 1.3% of our sample attain this average figure.
3
http://blog.sysomos.com/2010/01/14/exploring-the-use-of-twitter-around-the-world/
4
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmgeneral/deleg2/090309/90309s01.htm
Conservative Labour Lib Dem
5
Some candidates have multiple profiles or pages. Where this is the case, we have used only the one page we consider to be the
principle campaigning page for that candidate, whether a group, a fan page or in some instances a personal profile.
300
250
200
300
100
50
0
Labour Conservative Lib Dems
Exc. leaders
Respect’s leader Salma Yaqoob has built a solid online following and is almost unchallenged online by other
candidates for Birmingham Hall Green. Another prominent Respect candidate, George Galloway, has
amassed a huge amount of supporters online in his fight to gain Poplar and Limehouse.
In Barking, neither Labour’s Margaret Hodge nor the Conservative’s Simon Marcus have embraced online
campaigning to the same extent as their controversial opponent, BNP leader Nick Griffin.
Caroline Lucas, in Brighton Pavilion, has capitalised on her national profile to build a strong online following.
However, in this case, both Nancy Platts and Caroline Vere, of Labour and the Conservatives respectively,
have also fully embraced and engaged new media effectively.
Esther Ranzen in Luton South was developing a decent online following on Twitter and is generally well
engaged with website and blog activity. None of the candidates from the major parties are using new media
as effectively.
Tips for candidates: build a better online campaign
1. Prepare and understand
• Engage with supporters and followers, rather than just use as a broadcast medium
Bethnal Green & Bow Abjol Miah Carshalton & Wallington Tom Brake
Rushanara Ali Ken Andrew