You are on page 1of 5

The Stupidity of the EDSA 2 "People Power"

Gullibles Relived
by Jesusa Bernardo
(First published at Newsvine on 23 Jan. 2008
Updated 17 August 2008 HKT))

Last February 2008, a running broadcast advertisement relived the stupidity of the EDSA
2 crowd conned into deposing the constitutionally-elected Joseph Estrada and installing
Gloria Arroyo as successor. The anniversary advert that ran in Philippine television
stations showed Arroyo swearing in as "acting President" amidst the seditious sea of mob
humanity who flocked the streets of EDSA. What followed was a series of 'testimonies'
of ordinary individuals who claim to have experienced economic gains after the
revolutionary change in government. Amidst the consistent surveys showing the worst
levels of hunger, worst perceptions of corruption and worsening personal and national
quality of life and--all under Arroyo’s illicit reign--the political spot came as almost a
complete joke.

The Deception in EDSA 2

This laughable political advert is part of the "Arroyo administration's seventh anniversary
celebration of the now infamous EDSA 2 putsch-cum-People Power that overthrew the
popular Estrada, and which sent the Filipinos into seven years of polarization and
political instability. It illustrates how Arroyo has used the power of media to seize power
and even, to maintain her hold on it.
The traditional local media had largely hailed the 2001 coup as a "People Power" triumph
over the supposed corruption of President Estrada. In fact, the mainstream broadcast and
print Philippine media have served as an influential force in advancing the demonization
and ouster of the sitting President and further, in deviously disguising before the Filipinos
the constitutional anomaly that is EDSA 2.

Anti-Estrada Propaganda

The 'long live EDSA 2!' and 'Estrada is Guilty"' propaganda campaigns participated in by
most of the Philippine media actually began months prior to January 2001 during the
drive to depose President Estrada. In what has been later exposed to be a well-
orchestrated scheme by elitist elements that included the camp of then Vice-President
Arroyo and former President Fidel Ramos, the local broadcast and print media played an
instrumental role in demonizing Estrada and generating some public support for his
ouster. Soon after Estrada decided to leave Malacanang to avoid any possible
confrontation with his followers, the largest television stations, GMA-7 and ABS-CBN,
ran for several weeks their 'victory' footages of the four-day revolution, acclaiming it as
supposedly a victory for democracy in the land.

Edsa 2 Coup or "mob rule as cover for a well-planned coup"

In contrast, the foreign media were in general agreement in their critical coverage of
EDSA 2 "People Power", describing the event as a power grab instead of as transition
enabled by "People Power." Phil Bowring of the International Herald Tribune decried the
impeachment walkout and the revolt, saying that "far from being a victory for democracy
that is being claimed by leaders of the Anti-Estrada Movement such as Jaime Sin, the
evolution of events has been a defeat for due process.” Time Magazine, in its February
19, 2001 issue, saw how “People power 2 was swift justice indeed--as in a lynching, it
repudiated the very essence of due process enshrined in the constitution.”

Even foreign politicians and analysts shared the criticism of EDSA 2. Then Singapore
Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew was quoted by The Straits Times on how he viewed "the
change of power in the Philippines [as being] no boost for democracy because it was
done outside the constitution." Wikipedia also quotes Hong Kong-based political analyst
William Overholt who referred to EDSA 2 as "mob rule or mob rule as a cover for a well-
planned coup."

Very unlike what the mainstream local media wanted the Filipinos to believe, EDSA 2
was no real showcase of "People Power" but rather, the fruition of a sophisticated and
complex power grab conspiracy. Part of the planning and execution of the coup-in-
disguise included the exercise of subtle psychological warfare by a major general who is
a veteran in this game. In the midst of the Estrada impeachment, his predecessor Fidel
Ramos--himself beleaguered by corruption charges--marched on the streets of EDSA in a
move that seemed to beckon the people to protest and follow suit. True enough, in what
can be dubbed as a spectacular coup in psychological warfare, the more gullible Filipinos
followed suit and began to throng to EDSA following the walkout from the Estrada
impeachment when the anti-Estrada camp lost the vote count for the opening of the
"second envelope."

People Power II Myths

Contrary to the lying claim propagated by the Arroyo administration and EDSA 2
stalwarts though media propaganda, the unseating of Estrada did not come about because
of a well-intentioned, spontaneous popular revolt. An interview conducted by renowned
author Nick Joaquin and which first appeared in the Philippine Graphic revealed that a
power grab from Estrada had been planned long before the impeachment and that two of
the key putschists were no other than Gloria Arroyo and her husband Mike Arroyo. With
or without a popular component, the overthrow of the President with the highest plurality
vote in history would have pushed through.

The defection of the military's top brass was the focus of the putschists' Plan A. This
priority plan was what brought in the campaign to bring people to EDSA through media
propaganda and centralized invitation by cellular texting. Arroyo's camp managed to
convince then Chief-of-Staff Angelo Reyes to join, but on the condition that there will be
a million-strong crowd in the streets of EDSA to help convince the service commanders
to join.

Arroyo and Singson's camp also had a Plan B that included having elements of the
military strike the initial blow by withdrawing from the government, to be followed by
other groups such as the Philippine Military Academy graduates from Class '71, Class
'72, etc. Moreover, they had a bloody "back-up strike force" given the orders to shoot
against every place in Metro Manila and the provinces where Estrada forces will resist. It
is herein seen that the unseen hand that directed the propaganda and political
machinations against Estrada had a heartless determination to grab power. For all the
illusions of the EDSA 2 people, it has become apparent that they had simply served as
pawn to overthrow a very popularly elected leader. Worse, the EDSA "People Power"
principle of a peaceful revolutionary change in government was in no way a
consideration for the elitist elements who never respected the millions of masa (lower-
class) votes received by Estrada.

Concededly, though, idealistic elements were present in the civilian support of EDSA 2.
No less than members of the youth and the academic community lend some dignity to the
rebellious occasion. It is even safe to state that the country's premiere university, the
University of the Philippines, attended in majority force. It is just so sad that for all their
intelligence and patriotic aspirations, the more honorable of the EDSA 2 civilians had
been, well, had. Conned by political opportunists and elitist elements who envision
democracy to work according to their convenience, they prejudged Estrada as guilty
without the benefit of a fair and complete trial. The seemingly possessed EDSA 2 mob
then dropped half their principles and acted in a Machiavellian fashion to taunt, jeer and
malign Estrada. The climax came rather swiftly as the threat of the lynching mob--
foolhardily ignorant of the putschists' machinations--was conveniently used to negotiate
Estrada's departure from Malacanang. Aided by the seditious "party" animal, then
Supreme Court Justice Hilario Davide, and failing to smell the odor of the wicked wolf in
their midst, the pathetically jubilant mob then foolishly handed the Presidency to Gloria
Macapagal Arroyo in a silver but tainted platter.

Revolution towards Greater Hunger and Corruption

It is most ironic that the 'Oust Estrada' campaign rode on the wings of anti-corruption and
moral recovery promises but ended up driving the country into probably unprecedented
post-war levels of misery, a corruption and immorality.

2007 was particularly a year of ignominy for Arroyo on several counts. Despite her proud
but dubious claims of steering the country into economic stability, a Social Weather
Station survey study shows that the level of total hunger hit its highest last year--the
second time in her administration. Another 2007 survey, this time by Pulse Asia, betrays
how Filipinos consider themselves and their countrymen worse off now than some years
back ago.

It is in the area of morality, however, that Gloria Arroyo received the worst disgrace of
her political life. The October 2007 Pulse Asia nationwide survey on corruption revealed
how Filipinos view her as the "Most Corrupt President in Philippine History." The survey
results prove particularly embarrassing not only for Arroyo but, perhaps, also for those
responsible for her unconstitutional ascent into the Presidency because she even beat
Guinness-holder Ferdinand Marcos for the inglorious title.

Estrada, who has faced the politically-suspect Plunder charges and seven years of
consistent demonizing by the Arroyo administration and elitist camps, placed only third
in the list (he placed second as the “Least Corrupt” leader next to Corazon Aquino. What
had made Gloria Arroyo top the "Most Corrupt" list is nothing else but a long litany of
corruption issues that began soon after the EDSA 2 "People Power" gave her the reigns of
illicit power.
Mea culpa

A number of personalities and participants of EDSA 2 have already admitted to the


mistake, nay stupidity(?), of the Estrada ouster. Prominent among them is former
President Corazon Aquino. While admission and penance may not necessarily bring back
the constitutional order of the government of the Philippines, nor undo the defamation of
Estrada, nor perhaps the lives of those who died by hunger or poverty-related suicide due
to corruption of public funds, nor return the lost honor of the Supreme Court, it is a step
in right direction. The zeal for change may sometimes override sobriety and foresight,
and lead people to stupid decisions. Let EDSA 2, then, be a bitter blunder to rectify
because otherwise, the nation as a whole will suffer worse.

References for the Charts/Tables:

Additional Findings on Corruption-Related Issues. Oct. 2007. Pulse Asia.


http://pulseasia.com.ph/pulseasia/story.asp?id=632

December 2007 Social Weather Survey: Satisfaction with the National Administration
High on Foreign Relations, but Poor on Fighting Inflation, Corruption and
Hunger. 14 Jan. 2008. Social Weather Stations.
http://www.sws.org.ph/pr080114.htm

You might also like