Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
6Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
10-04-18 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 4 Amended Request for Incorporation by Reference s

10-04-18 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 4 Amended Request for Incorporation by Reference s

Ratings: (0)|Views: 40 |Likes:

More info:

Published by: Human Rights Alert, NGO on Apr 19, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/13/2011

pdf

text

original

 
Case No 09Case No 09Case No 09Case No 09----A827 A827 A827 A827IN THEIN THEIN THEIN THESUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATESSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATESSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATESSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ______________  ______________  ______________  ______________ RICHARD I. FINE,Petitioner,v.SHERIFF OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY,Respondent. ______________  ______________  ______________  ______________ On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpusto the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ______________  ______________  ______________  ______________  AMENDED REQUEST FOR INCORPORATION BY REFERENCEJOSEPH ZERNIK 
In Pro Se 
1853 Foothill BlvdLa Verne, CA Mail: PO Box 526La Verne, CA 91750Phone:323.515.4583Fax: 323.488.9697Email <jz12345@earthlink.net
Digitally signed byJoseph H Zernik DN: cn=Joseph H Zernik,o, ou,email=jz12345@earthlink .net, c=USLocation: La Verne,CaliforniaDate: 2010.04.19 00:25:41-07'00'
 
Fine v Sheriff 
(09-A827) 1/5
[PROPOSED] INTERVENOR’S[PROPOSED] INTERVENOR’S[PROPOSED] INTERVENOR’S[PROPOSED] INTERVENOR’S REQUEST FOR INCORPORATION BY REQUEST FOR INCORPORATION BY REQUEST FOR INCORPORATION BY REQUEST FOR INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE OF DOCKETS AND RECORDS OF OTHER CASES AT THE USREFERENCE OF DOCKETS AND RECORDS OF OTHER CASES AT THE USREFERENCE OF DOCKETS AND RECORDS OF OTHER CASES AT THE USREFERENCE OF DOCKETS AND RECORDS OF OTHER CASES AT THE USCOURTSCOURTSCOURTSCOURTSConcomitantly filed under separate faces:1. Motion to Intervene;2. Request for Lenience by Pro Se Filer;3. Request for Corrections in US Supreme Court Records;4. Request for Incorporation by Reference.5. AppendicesTO THE COURT AND TO PARTIES: [Proposed] Intervenor Joseph Zernik hereinrequests that the Court permit incorporation by reference of the dockets and papersof other cases in US Courts, as detailed herein.
 1.1.1.1. The dockets and papers of the captions, where incorporation is requested,The dockets and papers of the captions, where incorporation is requested,The dockets and papers of the captions, where incorporation is requested,The dockets and papers of the captions, where incorporation is requested,include crucial evidence for instant Motion to Intervene.include crucial evidence for instant Motion to Intervene.include crucial evidence for instant Motion to Intervene.include crucial evidence for instant Motion to Intervene.
(a)
Zernik v Connor et al 
(2:08-cv-01550) - at the US District Court, CentralDistrict of California, and(b)
Fine v Sheriff  
(2:09-cv-01914) - at the US District Court, Central District of California(c)
Zernik v USDC-CAC 
(08-72714) – at the US Court of Appeals, 9
th
Circuit(d)
Fine v Sheriff  
(09-71692) – at the US Court of Appeals, 9
th
Circuit
 
Fine v Sheriff 
(09-A827) 2/5
(e)
Fine v Sheriff  
(09-56073) – at the US Court of Appeals, 9
th
Circuit(f)
Borrower William Alan Parsley 
(05-90374) - at the US Bankruptcy Court,Southern District of Texas, Houston. In particular: Dkt #248, March 5, 2008Memorandum Opinion – describing fraudulent litigation practices by CFC,and Dkt #256-260 – filings by Zernik describing in details the alleged fraud inlitigations in Los Angeles County, which resulted in real estate fraud, asopined by highly decorated fraud expert – James Wedick.(g)
Borrower Sharon Dianne Hill 
(01-22574) - at the US Bankruptcy Court,Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh.Relative to the records in all cases – request is for incorporation by reference notonly of the PACER records, which are publicly accessible, but of all other recordsthat are accessible to the Court in CM/ECF, including, but not limited toauthentication records that are NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filings) and/or NDAs(Notices of Docket Activity), where the public is denied access.Relative to records in (a) through (e), where incorporation is requested by reference,such request was never intended to imply that such records were honest, valid, andeffectual court records. On the contrary, such are records are mostly deemed asfalse and deliberately misleading court records, and are incorporated in order toallow this Court to review such allegations.Respectfully submitted,Dated: April 18, 2010 Joseph Zernik

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->