Human Rights Alert

PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net

Blog:http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

10-04-18 Human Rights Alert - Appendix to UPR Report

The appendix includes a series of records in support of the allegations, conclusions, and recommendations inthe report. Links are provided to the online, digitally verified copies of records at the Human Rights AlertScribd account.

1) April 18, 2010 Human Rights Alert – Final Submission for the 2010 UPR of the United States

http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/10-04-18-Human-Rights-Alert-Final-Submission-to-the-United-Nations-for-the-2010-Universal-Periodic-Review-of-the-US-s

2) The case of the Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons)

A list of reports and studies by other organizations who document the scope and nature of the case, whichis claimed to be a Human Rights violation of historic proportions. The best estimate for the number of those falsely imprisoned for over a decade is from the acclaimed series by Public Broadcasting Service(PBS) LAPD Blues, and the estimates were at minimum 8,000, and possibly 16,000 or more.

Rampart FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) – a Review

– by Dr Joseph Zernik for Human RightsAlert.http://www.scribd.com/doc/24729660/09-12-17-Rampart-FIPs-Falsely-Imprisoned-Persons-Review

2001 Rampart False Imprisonments – by PBS Frontline Series: LAPD Blues

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24901612/01-05-01-Rampart-FIPs-Rampart-First-Trial-PBS-Frontline-Rampart-False-Imprisonments-s

2006 Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/06-07-15-LAPD-s-Blue-Ribbon-Review-Panel-Report-2006

d) 2001 The Justice System of Los Angeles County – by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky

http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/00-09-01-The-criminal-justice-system-of-Los-Angeles-County-California-by-E-Chemerinsky-57-Guild-Prac-121-2000

e) 2001 Policing the Justice System – by Prof David Burcham and Prof Katherine Fisk

http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/00-00-00-David-Burcham-and-Katherine-Fisk-Loyola-Symposium-The-Rampart-Scandal-Policing-the-Criminal-Justice-System-2000-s

3) Case of Richard Fine

Richard Fine – a Review -

by Dr Joseph Zernik for Human Rights Alerthttp://www.scribd.com/doc/24729084/09-12-17-Richard-Isaac-Fine-Review-e b)

Motion for Intervention in

Fine v Sheriff

(09-A827), at the US Supreme Court, for a conferencescheduled for April 23, 2010 –

by Dr Joseph Zernik At the time of writing this appendix, such papers were served on parties, but it is not known if thecourt would accept the filing of such papers in a timely manner. The motion and its Appendicesdocument the various fraudulent schemes employed against the 70 year old Richard Fine, who is heldin solitary confinement for over a year, with no warrant, and no judgment, conviction, or sentencingever entered in his case.

Digitally signed by Joseph H Zernik DN: cn=Joseph H Zernik, o, ou,email=jz12345@earthlink.net, c=USLocation: La Verne, CaliforniaDate: 2010.04.19 01:08:03 -07'00'



Page 2/4 April 19, 2010

A series of letters by Frederick Bennett, Court Counsel, Los Angeles Superior Court, in response toletters addressed to the Clerk of the Court and Presiding Judge. Such letters document that the LosAngeles Superior Court never operated for over a quarter century with honest, published Local Rulesof Court, instead, the court counsel made conflicting statements in various letters regarding the Rulesof Court. Most significant was the effective admission of the Court Counsel, that for over a quartercentury the Los Angeles Superior Court published false and deliberately misleading Local Rules of Court relative to true nature of Books of Judgments and Entry of Judgment in the Court. It is claimedthat the ambiguity created in entry of judgment at the Los Angeles Superior Court was key in theracketeering activity of judges of the court.Following the Court Counsel’s claim that the Microfilm Judgments archive was today the court’seffective Book of Judgments, a search was conducted that showed that no judgment for contemptwere ever entered in the case that was purported to be the basis for Richard Fine arrest-

MarinaStrand Colony II Homeowners Assn. vs County of L.A. Marina v LA County

(BS109420).Likewise, evidence is presented that no judgments were entered in other cases of significance:i.

Sturgeon v Los Angeles County

(

BC351286

) – a case that was purported to review the legalfoundation for the taking by ALL judges of secret payments from Los Angeles County forover a decade.ii.

Galdjie v Darwish

(

SC052737

) – a case that is alleged as the prototype of real estate fraud by judges and attorneys under the guise of litigation at the court.iii.

Samaan v Zernik

(SC087400) – a case that was opined as real estate fraud under the guise of real estate litigation, and followed the prototype of Galdjie v Darwish.

a) April 18, 2010 Amended Motion to Intervene

http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161573/10-04-18-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-1-Amended-Motion-to-Intervene-s

b) April 18, 2010 Amended Request for Lenience for Pro Se Filer

http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161636/10-04-18-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-2-Amended-Request-for-Lenience-by-Pro-Se-Filer-s

c) April 18, 2010 Amended Request for Incorporation by Reference

http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162109/10-04-18-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-3-Amended-Request-for-Corrections-in-US-Supreme-Court-Records-s

d) April 18, 2010 Amended Request for Corrections in US Supreme Court Records

http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162144/10-04-18-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-4-Amended-Request-for-Incorporation-by-Reference-s

e) April 18, 2010 Amended Appendix for Motion to Intervene

http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161692/10-04-18-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-5-Amended-Appendices-s

4) Case of Dr Joseph Zernik

The Addendum to Complaint to the Inspector General of the US Department of Justice documented thedisregard of senior US Officers to the Human, Constitutional, and Civil Rights of the 10 million residentsof Los Angeles County, California. The Inspector General, Glenn A Fine, so far refused to respond on thecomplaint. An inquiry in this regard was issued by the Hon Dianne Feinstein, Senator from California.Likewise, the complaint filed with Office of Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) reflects refusal of seniorUS Officers to provide equal protection. The OCC so far refuses to answer on the complaint, and inquiryin this regard was issued by the Hon Dianne Feinstein, Senator from California.The records linked below provide evidence for involvement of the most senior US officers and UScorporate management in conduct that was in disrespect of the Human, Constitutional, and Civil rights of US citizens, and demonstrated the ongoing refusal to enforce the law in Los Angeles County, California.

c) January 19, 2010 Addendum to Complaint filed on November 23, 2009, and again on December2, 2009 with Inspector General of US Department of Justice against Kenneth Kaiser – AssistantDirector of FBI for Criminal Investigations, and Kenneth Melson – then Director of US Dept of Justice, Office of US Attorneys



Page 3/4 April 19, 2010

http://www.scribd.com/doc/25445659/10-01-19-Addendum-to-Complaint-to-Inspector-General-US-Dept-of-Justice-re-refusal-to-protect-Los-Angeles-County-residents-against-racketeering-judg

b) March 9, 2010

Addendum to Complaint filed on November 23, 2009, and again on December 2,2009 with Inspector General of US Department of Justice against Kenneth Kaiser – AssistantDirector of FBI for Criminal Investigations, and Kenneth Melson – then Director of US Dept of Justice, Office of US Attorneys

http://www.scribd.com/doc/28125499/10-03-09-Addendum-to-Complaint-to-DOJ-IG-Regarding-Fraud-by-Kenneth-Kaiser-Assistant-Director-of-FBI-for-Criminal-Investigations

c) March 6, 2010 Addendum to Complaint filed with OCC against Bank of America Corporation

http://www.scribd.com/doc/29653627/10-03-06-Bank-of-America-Addendum-to-Appeal-1070442-filed-with-Office-of-Comptroller-of-the-Currency-against-Brian-Moynihan

d) February 26, 2010 Letter from the Office of the Hon Dianne Feinstein Re: Inquiry on US Deptof Justice Inspector General

http://www.scribd.com/doc/29659469/10-02-26-Senator-Feinstein-s-Inquiry-on-US-Department-of-Justice-Inspector-General-Glenn-A-Fine-s

e) March 11, 2010 Follow up letter from the Office of the Hon Dianne Feinstein Re: Inquiry on USOCC

http://www.scribd.com/doc/29647939/10-03-11-Bank-of-America-Senator-Dianne-Feinstein-Follow-Up-with-US-Office-of-Comptroller-of-the-Currency-Re-Bank-of-America-Corporation-s

5) Case management system (CMS) of the sheriff’s Department, Los Angeles County, California

Large scale false imprisonments in Los Angeles County, California are alleged through holding of inmates based on false records, routinely posted by the Sheriff’s Department in its online public accesssystem “Inmate Information Center”, while denying access to the true arrest and booking records, whichare public records by

California Public Records Act

– GOVT. CODE §§ 6250 - 6276.48

a) Data Survey

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24809956/10-01-04-Los-Angeles-Sheriff-Department-Inmate-information-Center-data-survey-Jose-Martinez-s

b) Data Survey

http://www.scribd.com/doc/25064776/10-01-11-Sheriff-s-Department-of-Los-Angeles-County-Inmate-Information-Center-data-survey-Jose-Rodriguez-s

c) Data Survey

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24816245/10-01-05-Sheriff-s-Department-of-Los-Angeles-County-Inmate-Information-Center-data-survey-John-Smith-s

d) Data Survey

http://www.scribd.com/doc/28350775/10-03-14-Survey-of-Los-Angeles-County-Sheriff-s-Department-Inmate-Information-Consecutive-Numbers-s

e) Data Survey

http://www.scribd.com/doc/25315610/10-01-16-Los-Angeles-County-Sheriff-s-Department-inmate-data-survey-VINE-vs-Inmate-Information-Center-re-Jose-Martinez-Jose-Rodriguez-s

f) Addendum to Complaint filed with the Sheriff’s Department – alleged fraud in BookingTerminals

http://www.scribd.com/doc/28322231/10-03-13-Addendum-to-Complaint-Sc2262473-Sheriff-s-Department-re-Alleged-Fraud-in-Booking-Terminals-s

6) Case management system (CMS) of the Los Angeles County, California, Superior Court