Dr Z

Joseph Zernik, PhD

PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750;
Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net
Blog: http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

10-04-19 Definitive New Evidence Produced of Alleged Wrongdoing by Los Angeles

Superior Court, Sheriff Against the Falsely Imprisoned Richard Fine

Los Angeles, April 18 amended papers, [1] served by Dr Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles County resident
and founder of Human Rights Alert, provided conclusive evidence of wrongdoing against Dr Richard
Fine by Judge David Yaffe, the Los Angeles Superior Court, and the Sheriff. The papers included
declaration by Dr Zernik regarding his April 16, 2009 search of the microfilm judgment archive of the
Los Angeles Superior Court, [2] where the March 4, 2009 Judgment of Contempt re: Fine was not found
as an entered judgment. The false and deliberately misleading Judgment record (Dkt #16-2) was
represented on behalf of Judge Yaffe and the Superior Court as the foundation for Fines imprisonment in
the Habeas Corpus petition at the US District Court, LA Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914).
An October 28, 2009 letter [3] by Court Counsel Frederick Bennett to Dr Zernik claimed that the
microfilm judgment archive served, since 1974, as the effective Book of Judgment at the Los Angeles
Superior Court. Entry of any judgment of the Court into a Book of Judgment was required by California
law to make the judgment effectual for any purpose.
The Court Counsels letter came in response to a series of September-October 2009 letters, [4] in which
Dr Zernik noticed the Los Angeles Superior Court Presiding Judge Charles McCoy, and Clerk of the
Court John A Clarke, of alleged widespread wrongdoing in the operations of the Los Angeles Superior
Court. Already in 2008 complaint filed with FBI and then US Attorney General Michael Mukasey, Dr
Zernik alleged that a key to enabling alleged widespread perversion of justice at the Los Angeles
Superior Court was the failure of the Court, for over a quarter century to publish honest Local Rules of
Court, in which the Due Process procedures employed by the Court for Entry of Judgment were
explicitly and honestly stated.
In his October 2009 notices to Presiding Judge McCoy, Dr Zernik provided a list of cases as examples
of the alleged wrongdoing. The false March 4, 2009 Judgment for Contempt RE: Fine in Marina v LA
County (BS109420) was alleged as an instrument for the perpetration of false imprisonment on Fine.
Also listed were two false Judgments by Justice James A Richman in Sturgeon v Los Angeles
County (BC351286) - a case that held in the balance the prospect of any future honest court services in
Los Angeles County for years to come. Two other cases were listed - Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737)
and Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) in which false judgments were instruments for opined or alleged real
estate fraud by judges and attorneys under the guise of civil litigations.
In his 2009 notices, Dr Zernik requested that Presiding Judge McCoy initiate corrective actions,
including, but not limited to the disclosure of the true Local Rules of Court in re: Entry of Judgment, and
publication of such rules, as required by law.
The October 28, 2009 response by Court Counsel Bennett claimed that the entry in the microfilm
judgment archive substituted since 1974 the use of the traditional paper-based Books of Judgments.
However, to this date, the Local Rules of Court were never updated to reflect such key procedures.
In the April 16, 2010 visit to the Courts microfilm judgment archives, [2] a total of nine judgments
and/or appealable orders were searched from the cases which were listed in Dr Zerniks 2009 letters. The
searches were conducted by a clerk offices staff member and the supervisor of the judgment microfilm
archive in Dr Zerniks presence. Only one of the nine records was found entered in the microfilm records
June 2, 2008 Judgment by Judge David Yaffe in Marina v LA County (BS109420) pertaining to the
petition for injunction regarding development in Marina del Rey. None of the other records was found

Page 2/3 April 19, 2010

entered in the microfilm judgment archives of the Court.

Such findings provided conclusive evidence that there was no valid and effectual record to provide the
legal foundation for the holding of Fine by the Sheriff. Therefore, Zernik requested in his papers that
the US Supreme Court find that Fine was entitled to his immediate release.
The corruption alleged by Dr Zernik extended far beyond the Los Angeles Superior Court. The cases,
which were subject of Dr Zerniks investigation, involved actions by California Courts of Appeals. Such
appeals from judgments, which had never been entered, was alleged as founded in fraud as well.
Moreover, Dr Zernik noted that in review of the public access systems of the California Court of
Appeals, none of the Districts provided any field for recording the Date of Entry of Judgment data,
which was critical for establishing the validity and timeliness of any appeal. Furthermore, Dr Zernik
noted, that California Chief1 Justice Ronald George served in various leadership positions in the Los
Angeles County Superior Court during the years in which the Court failed to publish honest Local Rules
of Court pertaining to Entry of Judgment.
Accordingly, in papers submitted on April 18, 2010 on behalf of Human Rights Alert to the United
Nations and the US State Department, [5] widespread corruption and racketeering in the justice system
were alleged as the cause of widespread abuse of the Human Rights of the 10 million residents of Los
Angeles County, California. Dr Zernik called for international monitoring of the California and the US
justice systems. Absent international monitoring, Dr Zernik opined that it was unlikely that any
improvement would be likely in the justice system and the Human Rights conditions of the people of
Los Angeles County, California. Dr Zerniks submission was part of the pending November 2010 first
ever review of the Human Rights record of the US by the United Nations.
The case of Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) is scheduled for conference of the US Supreme Court on April 23,
2010.

LINKS:
[1] April 18, 2010 Dr Zerniks amended papers served on parties in Fine v Sheriff (09-A827)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161573/10-04-18-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-1-Amended-Motion-to-
Intervene-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161636/10-04-18-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-2-Amended-Request-for-
Lenience-by-Pro-Se-Filer-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162109/10-04-18-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-3-Amended-Request-for-
Corrections-in-US-Supreme-Court-Records-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162144/10-04-18-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-4-Amended-Request-for-
Incorporation-by-Reference-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161692/10-04-18-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-5-Amended-Appendices-s

[2] Zernik Declaration regarding April 16, 2010 visit to the microfilm judgment archives of the Los
Angeles Superior Court:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30185575/10-04-18-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-Zernik-s-Amended-Appendix-
IX-b-Zernik-s-Declaration-in-re-April-16-2010-search-for-records-in-the-Courts-microfil

[3] October 28, 2009 letter by Court Counsel Bennett to Zernik, in response to the October 16, 2009
letters to Presiding Judge McCoy, stating that the microfilm archive served as an equivalent of Books of
Judgments.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30017888/09-10-28-Bennett-Court-Counsel-on-Denial-of-Access-to-
Sustain-Registers-of-Actions-Books-of-Judgmentss

[4] October 16, 2009 letters by Dr Zernik to Presiding Judge McCoy, alleging criminality in court
operations, and requesting disclosure of Local Rules of Court in re: Entry of Judgment into Judgment

Page 3/3 April 19, 2010

Books, as required by law.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/30119483/09-10-16-Letters-to-reliably-inform-Presiding-Judge-McCoy-of-
Criminality-in-Court-operations-request-Rules-of-Court-re-Entry-of-Judgments-s

[5] April 18, 2010 Human Rights Alert submission for the 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of the
US by the United Nations.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/10-04-18-Human-Rights-Alert-Final-Submission-to-the-United-
Nations-for-the-2010-Universal-Periodic-Review-of-the-US-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/10-04-19-Human-Rights-Alert-Final-Appendix-to-Submission-to-
the-United-Nations-for-the-2010-UPR-of-the-US-s