The IEC finds that a member of the general assembly is a government employeesubject to the jurisdiction of the Commission. CO Const. Art. XXIX (2)(1).
III. APPLICABLE LAW AND PRECEDENT
Section 3 of Article XXIX (Gift ban) reads in relevant part:(2) No public officer, member of the general assembly, local governmentofficial, or government employee, either directly or indirectly as thebeneficiary of a gift or thing of value given to such person’s spouse ordependent child, shall solicit, accept or receive any gift or other thing ofvalue having either a fair market value or aggregate actual cost greaterthan fifty dollars ($50) in any calendar year, including but not limited to,gifts, loans, rewards, promises or negotiations of future employment,favors or services, honoraria, travel, entertainment, or special discounts,from a person, without the person receiving lawful consideration of equalor greater value in return from the public officer, member of the generalassembly, local government official, or government employee whosolicited, accepted or received the gift or other thing of value.
A. Lawful Consideration
In Position Statement 10-01, the Commission held that expenses for legislatorsto attend conferences paid for by a Government Exchange Organization (“GEO”) maybe paid by such GEO if supported by lawful consideration in the form of dues paid to theGEO by the state and a portion of such dues are dedicated to covering such travelexpenses. Position Statement 10-01, page 7.The requestor of this Advisory Opinion does not contend that the state pays duesto the Center for Business Intelligence (“CBI”). Rather, the requestor states that he willgive up several days away from his family and work and spend considerable time