Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword or section
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Beyond Good and Evil

Beyond Good and Evil

Ratings: (0)|Views: 23|Likes:
Published by ram234

More info:

Published by: ram234 on Apr 26, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





BEYOND GOOD AND EVILBY FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE(HELEN ZIMMERN TRANSLATION)INFORMATION ABOUT THIS E-TEXT EDITIONThe following is a reprint of the Helen Zimmern translation fromGerman into English of "Beyond Good and Evil," as published inThe Complete Works of Friedrich Nietzsche (1909-1913). Someadaptations from the original text were made to format it intoan e-text. Italics in the original book are capitalized in thise-text, except for most foreign language phrases that wereitalicized. Original footnotes are put in brackets "[]" at thepoints where they are cited in the text. Some spellings werealtered. "To-day" and "To-morrow" are spelled "today" and"tomorrow." Some words containing the letters "ise" in the originaltext, such as "idealise," had these letters changed to "ize," suchas "idealize." "Sceptic" was changed to "skeptic."TABLE OF CONTENTSPREFACEBEYOND GOOD AND EVILCHAPTER I: PREJUDICES OF PHILOSOPHERSCHAPTER II: THE FREE SPIRITCHAPTER III: THE RELIGIOUS MOODCHAPTER IV: APOPHTHEGMS AND INTERLUDESCHAPTER V: THE NATURAL HISTORY OF MORALSCHAPTER VI: WE SCHOLARSCHAPTER VII: OUR VIRTUESCHAPTER VIII: PEOPLES AND COUNTRIESCHAPTER IX: WHAT IS NOBLE?FROM THE HEIGHTS (POEM TRANSLATED BY L.A. MAGNUS)PREFACESUPPOSING that Truth is a woman--what then? Is there not groundfor suspecting that all philosophers, in so far as they have beendogmatists, have failed to understand women--that the terribleseriousness and clumsy importunity with which they have usuallypaid their addresses to Truth, have been unskilled and unseemly
methods for winning a woman? Certainly she has never allowedherself to be won; and at present every kind of dogma stands withsad and discouraged mien--IF, indeed, it stands at all! For thereare scoffers who maintain that it has fallen, that all dogma lieson the ground--nay more, that it is at its last gasp. But tospeak seriously, there are good grounds for hoping that alldogmatizing in philosophy, whatever solemn, whatever conclusiveand decided airs it has assumed, may have been only a noblepuerilism and tyronism; and probably the time is at hand when itwill be once and again understood WHAT has actually sufficed forthe basis of such imposing and absolute philosophical edifices asthe dogmatists have hitherto reared: perhaps some popularsuperstition of immemorial time (such as the soul-superstition,which, in the form of subject- and ego-superstition, has not yetceased doing mischief): perhaps some play upon words, a deceptionon the part of grammar, or an audacious generalization of veryrestricted, very personal, very human--all-too-human facts. Thephilosophy of the dogmatists, it is to be hoped, was only apromise for thousands of years afterwards, as was astrology instill earlier times, in the service of which probably morelabour, gold, acuteness, and patience have been spent than on anyactual science hitherto: we owe to it, and to its "super-terrestrial" pretensions in Asia and Egypt, the grand style ofarchitecture. It seems that in order to inscribe themselves uponthe heart of humanity with everlasting claims, all great thingshave first to wander about the earth as enormous and awe-inspiring caricatures: dogmatic philosophy has been a caricatureof this kind--for instance, the Vedanta doctrine in Asia, andPlatonism in Europe. Let us not be ungrateful to it, although itmust certainly be confessed that the worst, the most tiresome,and the most dangerous of errors hitherto has been a dogmatisterror--namely, Plato's invention of Pure Spirit and the Good inItself. But now when it has been surmounted, when Europe, rid ofthis nightmare, can again draw breath freely and at least enjoy ahealthier--sleep, we, WHOSE DUTY IS WAKEFULNESS ITSELF, are theheirs of all the strength which the struggle against this errorhas fostered. It amounted to the very inversion of truth, and thedenial of the PERSPECTIVE--the fundamental condition--of life, tospeak of Spirit and the Good as Plato spoke of them; indeed onemight ask, as a physician: "How did such a malady attack thatfinest product of antiquity, Plato? Had the wicked Socratesreally corrupted him? Was Socrates after all a corrupter ofyouths, and deserved his hemlock?" But the struggle againstPlato, or--to speak plainer, and for the "people"--the struggleagainst the ecclesiastical oppression of millenniums ofChristianity (FOR CHRISITIANITY IS PLATONISM FOR THE "PEOPLE"),produced in Europe a magnificent tension of soul, such as had notexisted anywhere previously; with such a tensely strained bow onecan now aim at the furthest goals. As a matter of fact, theEuropean feels this tension as a state of distress, and twiceattempts have been made in grand style to unbend the bow: once bymeans of Jesuitism, and the second time by means of democraticenlightenment--which, with the aid of liberty of the press andnewspaper-reading, might, in fact, bring it about that the spiritwould not so easily find itself in "distress"! (The Germansinvented gunpowder-all credit to them! but they again made thingssquare--they invented printing.) But we, who are neither Jesuits,nor democrats, nor even sufficiently Germans, we GOOD EUROPEANS,and free, VERY free spirits--we have it still, all the distressof spirit and all the tension of its bow! And perhaps also the
arrow, the duty, and, who knows? THE GOAL TO AIM AT....Sils Maria Upper Engadine, JUNE, 1885.CHAPTER IPREJUDICES OF PHILOSOPHERS1. The Will to Truth, which is to tempt us to many a hazardousenterprise, the famous Truthfulness of which all philosophershave hitherto spoken with respect, what questions has this Willto Truth not laid before us! What strange, perplexing,questionable questions! It is already a long story; yet it seemsas if it were hardly commenced. Is it any wonder if we at lastgrow distrustful, lose patience, and turn impatiently away? Thatthis Sphinx teaches us at last to ask questions ourselves? WHO isit really that puts questions to us here? WHAT really is this"Will to Truth" in us? In fact we made a long halt at thequestion as to the origin of this Will--until at last we came toan absolute standstill before a yet more fundamental question. Weinquired about the VALUE of this Will. Granted that we want thetruth: WHY NOT RATHER untruth? And uncertainty? Even ignorance?The problem of the value of truth presented itself before us--orwas it we who presented ourselves before the problem? Which of usis the Oedipus here? Which the Sphinx? It would seem to be arendezvous of questions and notes of interrogation. And could itbe believed that it at last seems to us as if the problem hadnever been propounded before, as if we were the first to discernit, get a sight of it, and RISK RAISING it? For there is risk inraising it, perhaps there is no greater risk.2. "HOW COULD anything originate out of its opposite? Forexample, truth out of error? or the Will to Truth out of the willto deception? or the generous deed out of selfishness? or thepure sun-bright vision of the wise man out of covetousness? Suchgenesis is impossible; whoever dreams of it is a fool, nay, worsethan a fool; things of the highest value must have a differentorigin, an origin of THEIR own--in this transitory, seductive,illusory, paltry world, in this turmoil of delusion and cupidity,they cannot have their source. But rather in the lap of Being, inthe intransitory, in the concealed God, in the 'Thing-in-itself--THERE must be their source, and nowhere else!"--This mode ofreasoning discloses the typical prejudice by which metaphysiciansof all times can be recognized, this mode of valuation is at theback of all their logical procedure; through this "belief" oftheirs, they exert themselves for their "knowledge," forsomething that is in the end solemnly christened "the Truth." Thefundamental belief of metaphysicians is THE BELIEF IN ANTITHESESOF VALUES. It never occurred even to the wariest of them to doubthere on the very threshold (where doubt, however, was mostnecessary); though they had made a solemn vow, "DE OMNIBUSDUBITANDUM." For it may be doubted, firstly, whether antithesesexist at all; and secondly, whether the popular valuations andantitheses of value upon which metaphysicians have set theirseal, are not perhaps merely superficial estimates, merelyprovisional perspectives, besides being probably made from somecorner, perhaps from below--"frog perspectives," as it were, to

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->