Joel E. Krischer, Latham & Watkins, LLP, Los Angeles, Cali-fornia, on behalf of amicus curiae Employers Group.Rae T. Vann, Norris, Tysse, Lampley & Lakis, LLP, Wash-ington, D.C., on behalf of amicus curiae Equal EmploymentAdvisory Council.John H. Beisner, O’Melveny & Myers, LLP, Washington,D.C., on behalf of amicus curiae Chamber of Commerce of the United States.Daniel J. Popeo, Washington Legal Foundation, Washington,D.C., on behalf of amicus curiae Washington Legal Founda-tion.Laura C. Fentonmiller, Constantine Cannon LLP, Washing-ton, D.C., on behalf of amicus curiae The Retail IndustryLeaders Association.Pamela Coukos, Mehri & Skalet, Washington, D.C., on behalf of amici curiae The National Employment Lawyers Associa-tion, The National Partnership for Women & Families, andThe National Women’s Law Center.Daniel B. Kohrman, AARP Foundation Litigation, Washing-ton, D.C., on behalf of amicus curiae AARP.Bill Lann Lee, Lewis, Feinberg, Lee, Renaker & Jackson,P.C., Oakland, California, on behalf of amici curiae Consum-ers Union, National Consumer Law Center, Center for Consti-tutional Rights, and Communities for a Better Environment.Audrey J. Wiggins, Lawyers’ Committee for Civil RightsUnder Law, Washington, D.C., on behalf of amici curiaeLawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, AsianAmerican Justice Center, Asian Pacific American Legal Cen-ter of Southern California, Legal Aid Society-EmploymentLaw Center, Mexican American Legal Defense & Educational
6145D
UKES
v. W
AL
-M
ART
S
TORES