Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Some Questions

    Uploaded by

    JOSCTI
    131 views1 page
    Do you think an audience of social scientists would know exactly what the writer is hypothesizing? do you feel that you could go out and conduct this research yourself? what can the writer do to make the methods section clearer?

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Do you think an audience of social scientists would know exactly what the writer is hypothesizing? do you feel that you could go out and conduct this research yourself? what can the writer do to make the methods section clearer?

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    131 views1 page

    Some Questions

    Uploaded by

    JOSCTI
    Do you think an audience of social scientists would know exactly what the writer is hypothesizing? do you feel that you could go out and conduct this research yourself? what can the writer do to make the methods section clearer?

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    SOME QUESTIONS

    INTRO
    Based on what the writer has written, do you believe that an audience of social scientists
    would know exactly what the writer is hypothesizing and how s/he understand the concepts
    (from Rheingold and/or Postman) that inform it? How can the writer make this material
    clearer?

    MEHTODS
    Based on the writer’s description of his/her methods, do you feel that you could go out and
    conduct this research yourself? What can the writer do to make the methods section
    clearer?

    RESULTS
    Does the writer succeed in reporting all of the relevant facts of his or her research (without
    accidentally starting to interpret them)? How can the writer make the results serve more
    effectively to set up the analysis section to come?

    ANALYSIS
    Does the writer make an original contribution to the scholarly discussion represented by the
    Rheingold-Postman debate? How can the writer further develop his/her original argument,
    so that it’s more complex, more original, more interesting to his/her audience?

    You might also like