5
The Agreement also allowed Sheridan to sell off its remaining inventory of theArchbishop’s infringing religious books.
6
The Michigan lawsuit alleged actual infringement of only the St. Andrew Work.
7
The Archbishop does not deny the fact of publication.3prejudice.
5
The Archbishop pledged that “in consideration of the overall settlement of thedispute concerning [the St. Isaac and the St. Andrew Works], [he] will not challenge thevalidity of the Monastery’s copyright and/or the registrations in and to [the St. Isaac andSt. Andrew works] at any time in the future.”
6
Agreement ¶ 1. The Agreement furtherprovided thatArchbishop Gregory warrants and represents that he, either personally orthrough his associates and agents, has not copied, duplicated, transcribed,reproduced, replicated, or infringed in any manner the St. Isaac Work, andthat no copy, duplicate, transcript, reproduction or replica, of any portion ofthe St. Isaac Work has been or will be printed or published by or forArchbishop Gregory and that Archbishop Gregory asserts that he does nothave any knowledge of the existence of any copy, duplicate, transcript,reproduction, or replica of any portion of the St. Isaac Work in any medium,and will not assist in the creation of copy [sic], duplicate, transcriptreproduction or replica of the St. Isaac Work in any medium, at any time inthe future.Id. at ¶ 2. Finally, the Agreement specified that “[n]o one has made any promise exceptas expressly set forth in this Agreement to induce any other party to enter into thisAgreement.” Id. at ¶ 11.The Archbishop owns the website
www.trueorthodoxy.info
. No later than Augustof 2007, the Archbishop posted (or caused to be posted), Homily 46 from the St. IsaacWork on the website.
7
The Archbishop does not charge the public a fee for access to hiswebsite.
Case 1:07-cv-12387-RGS Document 63 Filed 02/18/10 Page 3 of 17
Add a Comment