Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Northeast Intelligence Network - An Investigative Report Detailing President Obama's Birth Eligibility Controversy

Northeast Intelligence Network - An Investigative Report Detailing President Obama's Birth Eligibility Controversy

Ratings: (0)|Views: 496 |Likes:
Published by RemixNinja
Permission to reprint this report is granted with proper citation and link to the original article at www.HomelandSecurityUS.com AND www.CanadaFreePress.com.

The Obama eligibility issue: has it already been answered?

No. It has been a common tactic to refute questions about OBAMA’s eligibility by citing the Internet publication of a Certification of Live Birth (COLB), also known as a “short form birth certificate” purportedly issued by the state of Hawaii. The controversial document was originally posted on the Internet at http://www.dailykos.com, a political website on or about 12 June 2008 as questions about OBAMA’s place of birth and eligibility status began to become a popular Internet topic. As there was no certification of authenticity that accompanied the alleged document, its provenance could not be established.
Permission to reprint this report is granted with proper citation and link to the original article at www.HomelandSecurityUS.com AND www.CanadaFreePress.com.

The Obama eligibility issue: has it already been answered?

No. It has been a common tactic to refute questions about OBAMA’s eligibility by citing the Internet publication of a Certification of Live Birth (COLB), also known as a “short form birth certificate” purportedly issued by the state of Hawaii. The controversial document was originally posted on the Internet at http://www.dailykos.com, a political website on or about 12 June 2008 as questions about OBAMA’s place of birth and eligibility status began to become a popular Internet topic. As there was no certification of authenticity that accompanied the alleged document, its provenance could not be established.

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: RemixNinja on Apr 29, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/19/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 
Northeast Intelligence Network
www.HomelandSecurityUS.com
An investigative report detailing the Obama eligibility controversy
Douglas J. Hagmann, Director 
The man John Jay warned about27 April 2010:
I cannot think of any other subject in recent American history that has been so mired incontroversy, so factually misrepresented, mischaracterized and so misunderstood than the matter of the eligibility of Barack Hussein OBAMA II to hold the office of President of the United States. Despite itsimportance, the topic has been summarily dismissed as fodder for conspiracy theorists by many, whileothers insist that the question of OBAMA’s citizenship has been “asked and answered.” But has it reallybeen answered,
and if not, why not 
?In consideration of the controversy that continues to plague Barack Hussein OBAMA over his citizenshipstatus and his well documented sustained pattern of refusal to provide authenticated documentation of his birth records and numerous other pertinent records, I’ve conducted an in-depth investigation intothe matter in an effort to separate fact from fiction, myth from reality. My approach was the same I’veused as an investigator over the last 25 years on behalf of Fortune 100 companies in their selection of corporate executives, conducting due diligence background investigations. In this case, however, I wasnot afforded direct and unfettered access to the “applicant’s”, or in this case, OBAMA’s original records.Nonetheless, I conducted inquiries and a lengthy investigation researching the information directly orindirectly disclosed by OBAMA, as well as collections of documents, court records, official federal andstate documents, verbal statements, utterances and other documents determined to be of authenticprovenance.At issue is whether Barack Hussein OBAMA or any of his representatives have furnished sufficientdocumentation to prove his eligibility for the office of President of the United States under Article II,Section I of the U.S. Constitution that states:
 
“No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to thatoffice who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a residentwithin the United States.”Presently, OBAMA occupies the White House as the Chief Executive Officer of the United States of America. As president, he is the commander-in-chief of our armed forces and ultimately responsible forthe security of the United States. Any person of reasonable sensibilities would logically believe that hiseligibility status has long been established by the Federal Election Commission (FEC) or those inpositions of oversight for such matters. But has it?In order to be as comprehensive as possible, my investigative findings include important backgroundinformation into the legal definition of a “natural born citizen” as applicable to Article II of the U.S.Constitution. This background information is provided to clear up many common misconceptions aboutthe eligibility controversy, and to explain why so many people are confused and easily mislead over thisissue. After thoroughly investigating this matter, I have found demonstrable evidence that this confusionis a deliberate and highly effective tactic used to divert attention from a constitutional issue and thus,the rule of law, to the detriment of American citizens.This report will also provide insight into the reasons for the largely ignored yet unprecedented legal fightby Barack Hussein OBAMA II, his representatives and assigns, against any release of the authenticatedcopy of his long form birth certificate and a multitude of other relevant historical documents.
Natural Born Citizen Qualification: The Facts
Based on extensive research, there are two separate but equally relevant legal issues that involve thespecific eligibility of Barack Hussein OBAMA II to legally serve as President of the United States. First isthe U.S. Constitution which was adopted into law on 17 September 1787. As noted by Article II, Section Iof the U.S. Constitution, an individual born after 1787 cannot legally or legitimately serve as U.S.President unless that person is a “natural born citizen” of the United States.The second issue is the precise definition of a “natural born citizen.” The Fourteenth Amendment of theU.S. Constitution, adopted on 9 July 1868, furnishes a rather broad definition of who qualifies as a“natural born citizen.” Specifically, who qualifies as a natural born citizen legally qualified to hold theoffice of President of the United States under Article II, Section I of the U.S. Constitution lies at the coreof the eligibility argument. For the sake of clarity in advance of potential ancillary arguments, it is notedhere that the Twelfth-Amendment to the U.S. Constitution mandates that Vice-Presidents possess thesame qualifications as Presidents.Obviously, there is no legitimate controversy over the eligibility status of Barack Hussein OBAMA interms of his age and length of residency within the U.S. Despite popular belief by many to the contrary,there is, however, an unresolved issue over his status as “a natural born citizen, or a citizen of theUnited States.”
 
While many constitutional scholars hold different beliefs over the intent of the natural born citizenqualifier, I submit that an extraordinarily prescient illustration of logic behind this qualification can befound in a brief letter from John JAY, a founding father of the United States and the first chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court to George WASHINGTON dated 25 July 1787:------------------------------------------------------Dear Sir,Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to theadmission of foreigners into the administration of our national government; and to declare expresslythat the command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a naturalborn citizen.I remain, dear sir,Your faithful friend and servant,John Jay.------------------------------------------------------A study of the Federalist Papers and the writings of our founding fathers clearly indicate a concern forthe security of the United States stemming from “threats from within,” or to prevent foreign enemiesfrom becoming commander-in-chief. Given the nature and various enemies we currently face, the brief but ominous note to George WASHINGTON would certainly appear as relevant today, if not more so, asit was over 200 years ago.Three years after that note was written, Congress affirmed in 1790 that a person born abroad whoseparents are both citizens of the U.S. is, in fact, a U.S. citizen. In the years that followed, there have beenmany legal arguments to further define a natural born citizen. Based on extensive research, it wouldappear that the “next best” definition originates from an 1874 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in thecase of  
88 U.S. 162 (1874). The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that if an individual is bornin the United States and both parents are U.S. citizens at the time of birth, that individual is, in fact, anatural born citizen. That same Supreme Court decision also addressed the issue of a person born in theUnited States where one of the parents is
not 
a U.S. citizen at the time of the birth of the child. Theruling noted that in such a case, the child’s natural born citizenship status is “in doubt.”In any event, subsequent rulings by Congress and enacted by federal statute affirm that children bornabroad by parents who are both U.S. citizens are not only U.S. citizens themselves, but are recognized as“natural born citizens.” On the other hand, individuals born in the United States or elsewhere
by one or more parents who are
 
not 
U.S. citizens are not likely to be eligible to hold the office of President of theUnited States absent of federal statute affirming their eligibility.
Therein lays the current situation of Barack Hussein OBAMA II and the need to establish his citizenship status through authenticateddocuments.

Activity (3)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->