My reasoning is that Duran is innocent from unethicalpractices from extorting financial gains from TAP. Accordingto Senator Charles Grassley, "having informants report oncompany wrongdoings is the best way to prevent illegalactivity. There can never be enough bureaucrats todiscourage fraudulent use of taxpayer's money but knowingcolleagues might squeal can be deterrent" (Judge, 2007)p.179.The reason was for his innocence is there were 500boxes of evidence and the case settled. In addition, it costTAP over 1 billion dollars of legal fees to clear them ofall wrongdoing. David Stetler's, job as a defense attorneyis to defend whether the defendant is right or wrong.In this case, it clearly shows by its lesson that"whistle blowing" is good for an organization and those whoare unethical to "whistle blow" to extort money are mostlikely behaving with the same attitude as organizations whocommit unethical practices or crime.
. How might self-fulfilling prophecy affect a whistle-blower¶s search for incriminatingevidence against a company?
In the book Miracles it states, "That the Universal Lawis impartial and unemotional. It has no way of knowing what