High Quality
Open the downloaded document, and select print from the file menu (PDF reader required).
Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 62 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 1 of 50
~
-
fT\
o
·Digitallysignedby
J
0S
e
P
h
Joseph
Zernik
I
ii.,
ON:
cn=Joseph
Zernik,
. ) ~ : i 1 = j Z ~ 3 4 5 @ e a r t h l
Ze
rn'
I;;.
1 ' 1 1 § l ! ~ t . c ~ ~ U 5
/ I \ . ' ~
Date;2'110S.05.15"10:30:28
-<l]'OO'
DATE:MAY15,2008MOTION
FOR
LEAVE
TO
FILE
FIRSTAMENDEDCOMPLAINTPURSUANT
TOFRCP
15(a)WASFILEDMAY
9,
2008.FIRSTAMENDEDVERIFIEDCOMPLAINT,
FOR
DECLARATORY
AND
INJUNCTIONAL
RELIEF
FOR
VIOLATIONS
OF
FEDERALCONSTITUTIONALRIGHTSDEMAND
FOR
JURY
TRIAL
()::!
t...:»
~ f Y t
g
-z.:o
co
....
;7<.
:It
r-
:0
c:
:P"'
UNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT\
( ~ ~ 0
~
CENTRALDISTRICT
OF
CALIFORNIA\
, . ~ ~
.....J
\
""','~,
.;:i
-0
:x
\,
r - ~ o
......
'....
x-
i
V'()n
••
\
~ o
s::-
i ~ ~ '
0
CASENO.CV-08-01550-VAP-CWHON
C.
WOEHRLE,JUDGE
vs.
JOSEPH
ZERNIK,
Plaintiff
1JosephZemik22415SaintGeorgeSt.LosAngeles,CA900273Tel:(310)
4359107
4Fax:
(801)
9980917
Plaintiff
5
inpro
per
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
JACQUELINECONNOR
ET
AL.
17
D e f e n d a n ~
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
--1--
ZERNIK
v
CONNOR
ET
AL.
,VERIFIEDFffiSTAMENDEDCOMPLAINT
Digitally signedbyJoseph Zernik DN:cn=JosephZernik,email=jz12345@earthlink.net,c=USDate:2009.02.2400:58:59 -08'00'
Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 62 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 2 of 50
1
21
11
2
COMPLETE
LIST
OF
DEFENDANTS:
3
JacquelineConnor,AllanGoodman,
John
Segal,
Linda
Hart-Cole,Patricia4Collins,
Terry
Friedman,and
GeraldRosenberg-individuallyandinhis/her
5
officialcapacityasJudge
of
theSuperiorCourt
of
LosAngelesCounty,WestDistrict
and
6
LosAngeles
County
andLosAngeles
SuperiorCourt,
WestDistrict7
and
DebbieWitts-individuallyandinherofficialcapacityasCourtManager,Civil
8
Unlimited,theSuperiorCourt
of
LosAngelesCountry,WestDistrict
9and
Vivian
Jaime
-individuallyandinherofficialcapacity
as
CourtroomClerk,
10
Department
I,
theSuperiorCourt
of
LosAngelesCountry,WestDistrict
and
Retired
Judge
Gregory
O'Brien
-individuallyandinhiscapacity
as
Proposed
12
Referee,and
13
ADRServices,Inc-
as
acorporation,anditscapacity
as
aneutralproviderthatemployedRetiredJudgeO'Brien,
14
and
15
David
Pasternak
-individuallyandinhisofficialcapacity
as
Receiverin
Samaan
v
16
Zernik
(SC087400)
and
17
AngeloMoziloand
Sandor
Samuels-individuallyandintheircapacitiesasOfficers
18
of
CountrywideFinancialCorporation
and
19
CountrywideHomeLoans,Inc
20
and
Mara
Escrow
Company
and
22
ThomasBrown-individuallyand
as
apartnerinBrownandWhite,LLP
and
23
Zacharty
Schorr
-individually,and
as
principal
of
SchorrLaw
24
and
Lilit
Vardanian
-individually
25
Doe1-20
26
Defendants
2728
--2--
ZERNIK
v
CONNOR
ET
AL.
,VERIFIEDFIRSTAMENDEDCOMPLAINT
Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 62 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 3 of 50
1
COMES
NOW,
PlaintiffJOSEPHZERNIK,andherebyfilinghis
FIRST2AMENDED
COMPLAINT
againstthepartieslistedaboveforsevereandprotracted3abuse
of
Plaintiffs
U.S.ConstitutionalrightsforDueProcess,forFreeSpeech,and
4
forPossessioninthelitigation
ofthe
Samaan
v
Zernik
(SC087400)attheLosAngeles
5
CountySuperiorCOUlj-fromOct2005
to.
thepresent.
')-.
A.1
_
~
6
~ ' ) l . . ~ ,
I
rV\l
rr-
1>
G
t'\'\
~ ~
J
V
(l..v)
I)M,
,
L./
!
a.
Amended
FirstComplaint
filed
inConjunction
~ i t h
M o t i ~ n
for
Leavet
I
7
File
8
Plaintiffisfilingthis
FirstAmendedComplaint
inconjunctionwitha
Request9
for
aLeavetoFileFirstAmendedComplaint
Pursuant
to
FRCP15(a),filedundera
10
separatecover.ThisFirstAmendedComplaintalsoaddressesissuesraisedin
11
Defendants'
MotionstoDismissComplaint
filedbyDefendants-namely-claims
of
12
immunity
of
thejudges,receiverandproposedrefereeandtheYoungerdoctrineasa
13
reasonfortheUSCourttoabstainfromanyactioninthiscase.
14
15
16
b.
Request
for
AffirmativeAction
-
AccesstoTrialCourtLitigationRecords
and
to
Amend
thisComlaintagainOnceSuchAccessisAllowed.
PlaintifffiledwiththisCourtlastweeka
Request
for
AffirmativeAction
-
CourtactiontoallowPlaintiffaccesstoPublicRecordsthatarehisownTrialCourt
21
22
rightsinthislitigation.
17
18
LitigationRecords.Denial
of
accesstosuchrecordswasandiscentraltotheabuse
19
inflicteduponPlaintiffbyDefendants.Moreover,suchdenial
of
accessisagain
20
placingDefendantsinadvantageouspositioninthislitigation.Defendantsshouldnotbeallowedtobenefitfromtheoutcome
of
theirabuse
of
Plaintiffs
constitutional
23
24
25
2627
28
fit:PlaintiffisherebyrepeatinghisrequestthatthisCourtprovidereliefasitdeems
1.
toallowPlaintiffaccesstohislitigationrecords,asdetailedin
Docket
#_
,
Designation
of
RecordsonConsolidatedAppeal.
-3-
ZERNIK
v
CONNOR
ET
AL
,
VERIFIED
FmST
AMENDEDCOMPLAINT
Add a Comment