20 Jan 2009: As filed and stated on page 19 of the 2nd Amended Complaint of the Kerchner v Obama & Congress lawsuit initially filed on 20 Jan 2009, DNC Chairperson Nancy Pelosi issued & signed two different Certification Forms for Obama in 2008. In the first one which was only sent to the state of Hawaii it included the normal language that Obama met the constitutional eligibility requirements. But in the second one which she sent to the other 49 states she omitted that language. The RNC in the 2008 included the constitutional eligibility language in all its certification forms to all 50 states. Why did the DNC and Nancy Pelosi leave out the constitutionally eligible language to every single state except Hawaii, the alleged place of Obama's birth. Did Hawaii demand extra CYA protection from the DNC and Nancy Pelosi before they would put Obama on the ballot in Hawaii because people in Hawaii knew things about Obama the other 49 states did not know. It is the responsibility of the political parties to certify a candidate is eligible for the office they are running for. In the case of Obama, the DNC and Nancy Pelosi did not certify that Obama was eligible under the Constitution in 49 of the 50 states.
For more details on this lawsuit see:
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
http://www.protectourliberty.org
Original Title
DNC Chairperson Nancy Pelosi Issued & Signed Two Different Certification Forms for Obama in 2008
20 Jan 2009: As filed and stated on page 19 of the 2nd Amended Complaint of the Kerchner v Obama & Congress lawsuit initially filed on 20 Jan 2009, DNC Chairperson Nancy Pelosi issued & sign…