3
Missiles, terrorism, economic manipula-tion – those are external threats to theUnited States. However, there is a threat just as dangerous. It is an internal vicethat can destroy the fabric of our nation.Rep. Trent Franks (AZ) compared ournation to a ship. A ship will stay afloaton an ocean, but if water gets inside thecraft, the ship will sink. Rep. Frankssaid he believed the Supreme Court canbe the water that sinks our ship of state.Franks explained that the judiciary wasnever designed to have legislativepower. “The Judiciary was supposed tobe the weakest of all the branches of government, but now it may be the mostdangerous.”When judges create social policy or law,they are stepping beyond constitutionalbounds. He used as examples theSupreme Court decisions in
Roe v. Wade
and
Dred Scott v. Sanford
. When the judicial branch encroaches on the otherbranches, the delicate balance protect-ing us from tyrannical government getsthrown off.Franks asked, “How did we accept thisnotion of letting nine unelected officialsdictate social policies? Supreme Court justices seem to believe that movingtheir agenda through the judiciary is aright. When they do this, they become athreat to the Constitution they swore touphold, and in doing this, they threatenthe people’s freedom.”Rep. Franks quoted Abraham Lincoln:“We, the people, are the rightful mastersof both Congress and the courts – not tooverthrow the Constitution, but to over-throw men who pervert the constitu-tion.” Agreeing with Lincoln, Rep.Franks suggested that we, the people,have the right, and duty, to check judi-cial supremacy.Day one of the Eagle Forum CollegiansSummit opened with a motivatingspeech by Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota. With asmuch energy asany of the 18-24-year-olds,Bachmann bound-ed up the stepswith a shiningsmile and eyesaglow with thepassion of awoman on fire forher country.Bachmann urgedthe students tobecome activeadvocates of indi-vidual freedomand sovereignty.This must beaccomplished with the cooperation of
Saving Our National Sovereignty
by Emmalee Mattern
Oklahoma Christian University
SIXteenth annual leadership summit
The New Case Against Immigration
by Deborah Garrett
Huntingdon CollegeThe immigration debate for the last sev-eral years has focused on the flood of illegal immigrants.Conservatives haverightly argued thatunless we enforce ournation’s laws on immi-gration, we are support-ing lawbreakers and thebreakdown of internalsecurity.From the left we hearrhetoric tying illegals tothe claim that they dothe jobs Americans willnot take. Conservativescontinue to emphasize the cost of pro-viding social benefits such as healthcare and education to illegals.Illegal immigrants add a greater threatto national security because they enterthe country undetected. Some have acriminal background.Mark Krikorian, the executive directorof Immigration Studies, argues that thereal issue is the number of immigrants,not just their status as illegals.The number of legalimmigrants has risenalarmingly. Krikorianstates, “Annual legalimmigration – the num-ber of people awardedpermanent residencypotentially leading tocitizenship – has risenfrom fewer than400,000 in 1970 tonearly 1.3 million in2006.”Krikorian explained that today’s immi-grants’ struggle with assimilation is dif-ferent from the past because technologyenables them to live in a sub-culture.Many immigrants today, illegal andlegal, never fully embrace Americanculture. While America would like tocure world poverty and welcome all of
Stop the ImperialJudiciary
by Cossette Haner
George Wythe College
the world’s refugees, we cannot containvast millions of people and remain pros-perous.Limiting immigration into the UnitedStates is beneficial to other nationssince it preserves the economic stabilityof the U.S., enabling it to lead inhumanitarian efforts. One of the mainreasons why so many want to come tothe U.S. is to achieve economic stabilityand enjoy the freedoms of Americansociety. Placing educational standardson immigrants would greatly reduce theinflux and allow low-skilled Americansto obtain desperately needed jobs.Massive immigration of any type,Krikorian argues in his book
The NewCase Against Immigration
, does notbenefit the United States economicallyas it once did. Immigration may havebrought us a rainbow of diversity, butthat is not what made America great.What made America great are the idealsand principles our nation was built on.These ideals, applied to society, allowfreedom to flourish, giving people theopportunity to succeed.
“
The conference as a whole was well organized, sophisticat-ed and demanding of deep intellectual involvement,which I loved. It was so refreshing to be around so manylike-minded conservatives, and it provided me hope Ithought had faded last November 4.
Emmalee Mattern
Oklahoma Christian University
Mark Krikorian Emmalee Mattern with Rep. Trent Franks
the American people, and she warnedthat the trust involved in cooperationdoesn’t come from taxing citizens intopoverty.The foundations of freedom cannot becast aside toachieve bettermentfor the greatergood. The recentcall for a globalcurrency, govern-mental buyouts of private corpora-tions, and risingincome taxes arenot the kind of governmentalintrusion we need.Rep. Bachmanncontrasted the sov-ereignty designedby our FoundingFathers with thepower grab bythose holding government offices today.“Never before has one party been sodominated by such a power-grapplingagenda,” Rep. Bachmann said.An increase in laws, taxes and regula-tions is like a set of heavily restrictiveshackles. Each law is like another link in the chain; each tax increase is like apound of iron weighing us down. In aneffort to equalize, the federal govern-ment’s endeavors only enslave.Bachmann called for help from youngpatriots to stem the erosion of the tradi-tional American values of life, libertyand the pursuit of happiness. “The rugof freedom is being pulled out fromunder you,” she said. “We’re in a slowsurrender of our national sovereignty.”If we want to enjoy the freedoms ourgrandfathers fought for, we must speak our minds and share our beliefs. Savingour sovereignty demands no less.Personal freedom cannot exist withouteconomic freedom; the former cannotexist without the latter. “Our nation isaching for you,” Bachmann said. “Thisis your test of bravery.”
Collegian with Rep. Michele Bachmann
””
I learned so much.Thank you!Makes me want to bebold and run for officesomeday!
Landon Cook
Brigham Young University
“
Add a Comment