High Quality
Open the downloaded document, and select print from the file menu (PDF reader required).
Fund Background:
Hummingbird focuses on microcap value and is modeled on Buffett-Graham Partnership. Focuses on
$200M and below--usually around $100M; could have over 100 names in the portfolio.
The micro and nanocap areas offer great opportunities for investors now. These sectors underperformed
during the nuclear winter. A decade of neglect has been compressed into 2 yrs. Private market values
exceed public market values by a large margin. Traditional managers have become too large and too scared
to take advantage of these opportunities. Therefore, people willing to look at this space are left with a
potential for superior returns with less risk. Huge premium you are getting paid for due to illiquidity--a
result of there being so few investors in this space.
Hummingbird takes larger positions (greater than 5%) because it makes it easier to influence management
and can influence the outcome of their investment. Focus on firms with a single or a small number of
niches because they are easier to evaluate than firms that are in 10-15 businesses. Also, management is
much more accessible
5 factors they look at:
1. Potential upside (discount to intrinsic value)
2. Can you estimate intrinsic value?
3. Certainty of outcome
4. Timing-how long does it take for the gap to close?
5. Margin of safety
1. Information edge
2. Analysis edge
3. Trading edge
Other managers screen out (as a result of institutional constraints) the kind of stocks they look for and this
limits competition because others are looking for liquidity. This gives them a huge pond to fish in. There
are 5000 candidates that don’t file with the SEC and trade on the pink sheets that are on their radar. With
companies with market caps over $1B, there are probably only 2000 companies. So they have a lot of
stocks to look at without having to compete with hedge funds. They can get information by monitoring the
company’s website. Also, they produce simpler financial statements to look over and there are fewer buy
and sell side analysts covering the stocks. This allows them to get information that other don’t have. But,
they have to be in the market every single day because of the wide bid-ask spread. It is a very trading
oriented strategy.
Looking for catalysts- internal and external:
Internal (things that increase intrinsic value): things that increase ROIC, improving B/S
External (things that help close the gap between intrinsic value and price): takeout, new analyst coverage
Reduced working cap by closing
facilities—now making more money
with less investment
They are not competitors in the luxury markets-- only on the lower end of the business. If you are going to spend $100K on a piano you buy a Steinway. 30% are retrofitted as player pianos (bought by people who can’t play the piano)
The company increases it piano prices 4% every year like clockwork. Some years they sell more pianos and some years they sell fewer. In the band business they have pricing power to some extent. Their brand name gives them some pricing power.
They only place a value on it if there is an intention to sell. But they not going to sell in this market. They have excess space that they do not need and it does provide an extra margin of safety up to $50-$75M if something goes wrong.
Develops and publishes
video games for Xbox,
Nintendo Wi, etc
Could do a $100M in
revenue over the next year
or two
Have been in the business for 30
yrs---not fly by night and have a long
history
Mechanically, you just look at the cash flow statement. You go to the proxy statement and look at
management compensation. They always look at the section called related party transactions.. Get into a
dialogue with mgmt at maintenance CAPEX, growth CAPEX and potential acquisitions--interviewing
management teams is an art.
Their partner makes a market for them. If they are on the bid then it is a stock they are fine buying and if they are on the offer it is a stock they willing to sell. Need to be in the market each day just in case they need the liquidity--in 4 or 5 days they can get in and out of most positions.
Not investing in roach motels. When they are buying stock they are often competing with management who is buying back stock. So they get a surprising amount of liquidity. They were able to get liquidity and cover redemptions during the crisis. They can also sell the company back some shares directly--may not get the best price but they do get liquidity
Add a Comment