There was a problem sending you an sms. Check your phone number or try again later.
We've sent a link to the Scribd app. If you didn't receive it, try again.
I. Source of Issur
A. Gm Krisus 4b- 5 psukim that assur dam: Dam Chullin, Kodshim, Kisui, Eivarim, and
Tamtzis (blood that drains out after animal is already dead).
B. Mishna Krisus 20B- machlokes whether chayav kareis for dam tamtzis. Chachamim-
not chayav. R\u2019 Yehuda is mechayev. We hold like chachamim.
- Only chayav for dam shehaneshama is teluya bo (\u05ea"\u05e8 in Kesubos: Issur of taking blood
on shabbos is netilas neshama b/c dam that taking out is shehaneshama teluya ba b/c
person is alive).
1.\u05d9"\u05e9 \u05e8- b/c not dam hanefesh.
- R\u2019 Sheishes- human blood isn\u2019t nichlal in any of these issurim. Only time its assur is
when its pireish (on piece of bread, in a cup). Lichora, problem of maris ayin.
II. Dam eivarim shelo piresh/ Is Melicha necessary even for raw meat?
A. Mishna Chullin 14A- If shecht on shabbos or YK, Kosher Shechita.Gm \u2013 this is acc
to R\u2019 Yehuda, not R\u2019 Shimon, who holds that food that isn\u2019t muchan before shabbos is
assur on shabbos altz muktza.
**- He eats it raw and no need to do melicha if want to eat meat raw
b/c only issur dam is when it\u2019s pireish: Gm Chullin 111A- can eat liver just by pouring
hot water on it to keep dam inside. And 112A- if cut meat on bread and dam comes out,
the bread is assur but meat is kosher.
B. Gm Chullin 113A- If break the neck of the animal before the animal dies, the blood
doesn\u2019t come gushing out, so gm says you are machbid es habasar, gozel es habrios, and
are mavlia dam in the eivarim (b/c since it\u2019s heavier, will sell it for more than its worth
b/c a lot of that weight is dam, not meat). Gm wants to know is this only an issur gezel or
even an issur to eat? And gm leaves it as a teiku.
1. \u05d0"\u05d1\u05e9\u05e8 Thb- Calls this dam shepeirish mimakom l\u2019makom. And gm is asking
if you can eat this meat raw. Mashma, that in normal situation can eat raw meat without
melicha, and only when dam has been peirush mimakom limakom do we assur it.
However, if would do melicha, for sure it would be mutar.
(Others have girsa, that gm wants to know if mutar to eat at all, and gm leaves that as a
teiku, in which case this gmis n\u2019t telling us that generally it\u2019s mutar to eat meat raw).
2. \u05d4"\u05d0\u05e8 \u2013 Davka dam shepiresh ligamrei is assur, but if it moves mimakom
limakom, not assur. B/c when are moleiach dam, obviously don\u2019t get all of it out. Ela,
we are moleiach basar to extent that after pouring boiling water on it it would stop
coming out (Check this). And even though for sure some dam is traveling on its way out
when it is stopped. Ela vaday dam is only assur once its totally piresh.
(a) Case #1-7:11- Piece of meat is red b/c the animal had gotten abr uis e
mechaim, not called dam evarim shepiresh.
*Assuming that perish mimakom limakom is considered piresh.
(b) Case #2-1:19- Tzole basar, no need for melicha b/c the dam will come
out and fall to the ground. And the dam that is left inside and moves around inside, that\u2019s
not called dam eivarim shepiresh.
**Apparently holding that piresh mimakom limakom is not called piresh!? What about
in perek 7?!
4. \u05de\u05e8' MA 6:12 \u2013 Chiyuv Melicha even by raw meat. Gm never says that don\u2019t
need melicha by basar umtza. However, if chalto b\u2019chometz, now can eat it w/out
>69:18- Moleiach basar in kli she\u2019eino menukav:
-\u05e8 \u05d1\u05d7\u05de: Only part in tzir is assur.
-\u05d0" \u05de\u05e8: whole piece is assur, v\u2019hachi nohagim.
> 69:11- Bishul w/out melicha:
\u05e8\u05d1\u05d7\u05de: everything is mutar if there is 60 (\u05e9"\u05d0\u05e8).
\u05d0"\u05de\u05e8: yesh osrim that piece, but can be meikil l\u2019tzorech orchim or l\u2019kavod
III. Dam shebishlo
A. Gm Chullin 109A- not over on dam shebishlo, only issur dirabanan.
B. \u05d9"\u05e9\u05e8 Denies this halacha in 2 places:
1. Chullin 109A- Cooked the heart with the dam inside. \u05d9"\u05e9\u05e8- Case where not
chayav kareis is when it\u2019s oaf (no kizayis). But if it was beheima, would be chayav. But
\u05e0"\u05de\u05de, how can you be chayav kareish, you cooked it?!
*So what\u2019s pshat in \u05d9"\u05e9\u05e8?
C. Maadanei Asher- \u05d9"\u05e9\u05e8 thought that gm was only a HA. But acc to the maskana, only
talking about dam that is karush, that\u2019s when eino over alav b/c can\u2019t dip anything into it
(see inside). But just being mivushal is not enough.
I. Source of din
A. Gm Chullin 113A- R\u2019 Huna: Basar can only get rid of its dam w/ melicha and
hadacha. Braisa says to do hadacha beforeand after melicha. But gm says not a
machlokes, R\u2019 Huna was talking about a case where the butcher already did the hadacha
kamaysa, and if he didn\u2019t then you have to do it yourself.But \u05e2"\u05d5\u05db are modim that need
II. Reasons for this din (at least 5 Pshatim)
A. \u05df"\u05e8 Chullin 42A- Always assume that whenever a piece of meat is being poleit, it
cannot be boleia at the same time. Quotes two reasons for hadacha kamaysa:
Now bringing you back...
Does that email address look wrong? Try again with a different email.