Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
CO2 Irrelevant in Climate Debate Says MIT Scientist

CO2 Irrelevant in Climate Debate Says MIT Scientist

Ratings: (0)|Views: 15|Likes:
Published by PRMurphy
In a study sure to ruffle the feathers of the Global Warming cabal, Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT has published a paper which proves that IPCC models are overstating by 6 times, the relevance of CO2 in Earth’s Atmosphere. Dr. Lindzen has found that heat is radiated out in to space at a far higher rate than any modeling system to date can account for.
In a study sure to ruffle the feathers of the Global Warming cabal, Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT has published a paper which proves that IPCC models are overstating by 6 times, the relevance of CO2 in Earth’s Atmosphere. Dr. Lindzen has found that heat is radiated out in to space at a far higher rate than any modeling system to date can account for.

More info:

Categories:Types, Research
Published by: PRMurphy on May 15, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/15/2010

pdf

text

original

 
Carbon Dioxide irrelevant in climate debatesays MIT Scientist
http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-7715-Portland-Civil-Rights-Examiner~y2009m8d18-Carbon-Dioxide-irrelevant-in-climate-debate-says-MIT-ScientistAugust 18, 7:39 AMPortland CivilRights ExaminerDianna CotterIn a study sure to ruffle the feathers of the Global Warming cabal, Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT has published a paper which proves that IPCC models are overstating by 6 times, therelevance of CO
2
in Earth’s Atmosphere. Dr. Lindzen has found that heat is radiated out in to
The pdf file located at the link above from theScience and Public Policy Institute has  absolutely, convincingly, and irrefutably proven the theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming to be completelyfalse.
Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT’s peer reviewed work states “we now know that the effect of 
CO2 on temperature is small, we know why it is small, and we know that it is having very little
effect on the climate.”
The global surface temperature record, which we update and publishevery month, has shown no statistically-
 significant “global warming” 
 for almost 15 years. Statistically-significant global cooling has now persisted for very nearly eight years. Even a strong el Nino
 –
expected in the comingmonths
 –
will be unlikely to reverse the cooling trend. More significantly, the ARGO bathythermographs deployed 
 throughout the world’s oceans since 2003 show that the top 400
 fathoms of the oceans, where it is agreed between all parties that atleast 80%
 of all heat caused by manmade “global warming” must
 accumulate, have been cooling over the past six years. That now prolonged 
 ocean cooling is fatal to the “official” theory that “global warming” will happen on anything other than a minute scale.
If for no other reason than this: the IPCC assumes that the concentration of CO2 in 2100 will be836 ppmv (partsper million volume). However, current graphs based on real data show that CO2
concentrations will only be 570 ppmv in 2100, cutting the IPCC’s estimates in half right there.
 
Another nail in the coffin of Global Warming is the observed rate of temperaturechange from1980, which is observed to be 1.5 degreesC per century. The IPCC modeling calls for a range of 2.4 to 5.3 degree increase per century, which is far above what is observed in real data collectedbetween 1980 and 2009. The graph below clearly represents a far different reality as opposed tothe predictions.
Graph A
Not only is the IPCC basing its predictions on data that has been doubled from observed data, itis overstating the role of CO2 in Climate altogether. As the graph seen below shows, whencharted for the years between 2002 and 2009, that solid red median line is going down,indicating global cooling.
Graph B
 
As significant as the above results are, it is not the Pièce de résistance. What is-the curiousminded what to know? It is the ERBE results. The Earth Radiation Budget Experiment with 15years worth of data. The ERBE result is absolutely devastating to the entire Global WarmingTheory.The following graph (Graph C) shows the ERBE results in the upper left hand corner, which isreal recorded data, not a computer model. The 11 other graphs are the results from the models
used by the UN and everyone else which state that more radiation should be held within Earth’s
system, thereby causing warming of the climate. More simply put, the UN results illogicallypredict that as the oceans got warmer, the earth would simply hold more heat. The UN explainsthat it is CO
2
which is holding this extra energy. This theory is not supportable by the simple factthat CO
2
cannot hold thatmuch heat, it is a very poor greenhouse gas compared with water. If anything, more clouds-water vapor-would conceivably hold the extra heat, but thecorresponding rise in global temperatures this would cause have not been observed. This leavesonly oneconclusion, the Earth is radiating the extra heat into space, and this is supported by thedata.The ERBE results, which are factual data from real measurements made by satellite, show theexact opposite result from the UN/IPCC Projections (computer modelswhich are not real data).As seas warm on earth, the earth releases more heat into space and the satellite results prove it.
Graph C
 
Observed reality vs. erroneous computer predictions:

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->