Dr ZDr ZDr ZDr Z

Joseph Zernik, PhDPO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750;Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net

Blog:http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ Scribd:

http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

10-04-22 Zernik’s Declaration RE: Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) Mr Danny Bickell and Filing at theUS Supreme Court

Declaration of Joseph Zernik RE: Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) and Filing at the Supreme Court of theUnited States.

I, the undersigned Joseph Zernik hereby declare as follows:

This declaration was written as a memorandum of events pertaining to the filing of mypapers at the US Supreme Court in

Fine v Sheriff

(09-A827).

I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein, which I know to be trueand correct and, if called as a witness, I could and would competently testify withrespect thereto.

3) Around April 12, 2010, I, Joseph Zernik, first spoke with Mr Danny Bickell, staff member of the US Supreme Court Clerk's Office. At that time I informed him that Iintended to file a Motion to Intervene in

Fine v Sheriff

(09-A827), which was scheduledfor conference on April 23, 2010. His response was that filing papers in the case wastimely as long as the Application was pending before the court. He added that unless aMotion to Intervene provided a "compelling justification" for the intervention, it waslikely to be denied by the court.4) I informed Mr Bickell that I was going to mail it priority mail, and he made no commenton that.5) On April 15, 2010, I mailed the papers, priority mail, certified.6) On April 16, 2010 I called the court and spoke with staff member at the clerk's office, whoidentified herself as "Molly", in an effort to ascertain that the papers were received. Mollyinformed me that the papers were unlikely to reach the clerk's office by April 23, 2010,because of anthrax checks on all incoming mail.7) On April 20, 2010, I flew to Washington DC and hand delivered the papers at theSupreme Court security station, where receipt stickers were issued. I was informed thatthe papers would be at the hands of the clerk's office staff by the next morning, or thelatest by the next afternoon.8) On April 21, 2010 I called and spoke with US Supreme Court clerk's office case analystMr Erik Fossum. He informed me that my papers were indeed received, and that theywere held by Mr Danny Bickell.9) I was then forwarded to Mr Danny Bickell. He initially tried to tell me that the papers hadnot been received by the clerk's office, due to security checks. Only after I informed himthat Mr Fossum had already informed me that Mr Bickell was holding the papers, MrBickell admitted that such was indeed the case.



Page 2/3 April 22, 2010

10) Mr Bickell then proceeded to tell me that he had not yet decided regarding the dispositionof the papers. Mr Bickell never stated any discrepancy in the papers.11) I asked if he was authorized as a Deputy Clerk. He informed me that he was not.Regardless, he insisted that he was authorized to either docket the papers, or not docket thepapers without even a discrepancy notation in the docket, indicating that paper were filed,then rejected.12) I then asked him for the basis for his March 12, 2010 notice to the parties in Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) of denial by Justice Kennedy. The Rules of the Supreme Court were explicit,that the justice would note the denial on the petition. However, a March 22, 2010 copy of the petition from US Supreme Court file had no such notation on it. Neither was anyruling or order of denial listed in the log of orders of the court on or about March 12,2010. Mr Bickell responded that he was not required to answer such questions.

13)

The papers, which Mr Danny Bickell was holding, provided incontrovertible documentaryevidence, which Richard Fine himself had no access to, which showed that Richard Finewas held under alleged fraud in records of the Sheriff and the Los Angeles Superior Court,and that there was never any valid and effectual warrant, judgment, conviction, orsentencing entered in his case.

[1]

14)

In short - Mr Bickell was and is denying access to the US Supreme Court, in a manner thata reasonable person would conclude was likely to pervert justice in the case at hand.\

I make this declaration under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the UnitedStates.

Signed here, in La Verne, County of Los Angeles, California, April 22, 2010.

Joseph H Zernik, PhDBy: ______________JOSEPH H ZERNIKPO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750Phone: 323.515.4583Fax: 323.488.9697Email <jz12345@earthlink.net>Blog: http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ Scribd:http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

LINKS[1]

Zernik's filing in Fine v Sheriff (09-A827), documenting alleged fraud by Sheriff of Los AngelesCounty and Los Angeles Superior Court relative to warrant judgment and sentencing in the case of Richard Fine.http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161573/10-04-18-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-1-Amended-Motion-to-Intervene-s http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161636/10-04-18-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-2-Amended-Request-