For this reason, the Court denies Plaintiff’s
motion for oral argument.Additionally, since the Court granted Plaintiff’s
motion to submit a 30-page responsebrief to Defendants’ motion to dismiss, the Court denies Plaintiff’s request to submit a sur-reply.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGANSOUTHERN DIVISION
PULTE HOMES, INC.,Plaintiff,Case No. 09-13638vs.Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff LABORERS’ INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA,TERENCE M. O’SULLIVAN, andRANDY MAYHEW,Defendants._____________________________/
OPINION AND ORDER
AT A SESSION of said Court, held in the United States Courthouse,in the City of Port Huron, State of Michigan, on May 12, 2010PRESENT: THE HONORABLE LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFFUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss [dkt 29] and Plaintiff’s
motion for oral argument and/or leave to file a sur-reply to Defendants’ motion to dismiss [dkt36]. The parties have fully briefed Defendants’ motion to dismiss. The Court finds that the factsand legal arguments are adequately presented in the parties’ papers such that the decision processwould not be significantly aided by oral argument.
Therefore, pursuant to E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(e)(2),it is hereby ORDERED that the motion to dismiss be resolved on the briefs submitted. For the
Case 2:09-cv-13638-LPZ-MAR Document 37 Filed 05/12/10 Page 1 of 9