High Quality
Open the downloaded document, and select print from the file menu (PDF reader required).
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
OHS West:260792905.6F
ACEBOOK
’
S
M
OTION FOR
J
UDGMENT ON THE
P
LEADINGSOR
,
IN THE
A
LTERNATIVE
,P
ARTIAL
S
UMMARY
J
UDMENT OF
L
IABILITY
C
ASE
N
O
.5:08-
CV
-05780JF
I. NEEL CHATTERJEE (STATE BAR NO. 173985)nchatterjee@orrick.comTHOMAS J. GRAY (STATE BAR NO. 191411)tgray@orrick.comJULIO C. AVALOS (STATE BAR NO. 255350) javalos@orrick.comORRICK, HERRINGTON &SUTCLIFFELLP1000 Marsh RoadMenlo Park, CA 94025Telephone:+1-650-614-7400Facsimile:+1-650-614-7401JESSICA S. PERS (STATE BAR NO. 77740) jpers@orrick.comORRICK, HERRINGTON &SUTCLIFFE LLPThe Orrick Building405 Howard StreetSan Francisco, CA 94105-2669Telephone:+1-415-773-5700Facsimile:+1-415-773-5759Attorneys for Plaintiff FACEBOOK, INC.UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIASAN JOSE DIVISIONFACEBOOK, INC.,Plaintiff,v.POWER VENTURES, INC. a Cayman IslandCorporation; STEVE VACHANI, anindividual; DOE 1, d/b/a POWER.COM,DOES 2-25,inclusive,Defendants.Case No. 5:08-cv-05780 JF (RS)
NOTICE OF MOTION, MOTIONAND MEMORANDUM OF POINTSAND AUTHORITIES FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGSPURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(C)OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE,PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENTOF LIABILITY UNDER CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE §502(C)
Date:February26, 2010Time: 9:00 a.m.Judge:Hon. Jeremy D. FogelCourtroom: 3
Case5:08-cv-05780-JW Document56 Filed12/23/09 Page1 of 15
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
OHS West:260792905.6
-1-
F
ACEBOOK
’
S
M
OTION FOR
J
UDGMENT ON THE
P
LEADINGSOR
,
IN THE
A
LTERNATIVE
,P
ARTIAL
S
UMMARY
J
UDMENT OF
L
IABILITY
C
ASE
N
O
.5:08-
CV
-05780JF
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTIONTO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on February 26, 2010 at 9:00 am or as soon thereafter asthe matter may be heard, in the courtroom of the Honorable Jeremy D. Fogel, United StatesDistrict Court, 280 S. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113, Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”) will movethe court for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) or, inthealternative, motion for summary judgment on Facebook’s second cause of action for violationofCalifornia Penal Code Section 502(c)against Defendants Power Ventures, Inc.and StevenVachani (collectively, “Power”). These motions are based on the Notice of Motion and Motion,the supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities, all pleadings on file in this action, oralargument ofcounsel, and any other matter that may besubmitted at the hearing
Case5:08-cv-05780-JW Document56 Filed12/23/09 Page2 of 15
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
TABLE OF CONTENTSPage
OHS West:260792905.6
-i-
F
ACEBOOK
’
S
M
OTION FOR
J
UDGMENT ON THE
P
LEADINGSOR
,
IN THE
A
LTERNATIVE
,P
ARTIAL
S
UMMARY
J
UDMENT OF
L
IABILITY
C
ASE
N
O
.5:08-
CV
-05780JF
I.INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................1II.STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS................................................1A.Access To and Use of Facebook Is Limited..........................................................1B.Facebook allows interactions with other websites.................................................2C.Power’s Illegal Activities.....................................................................................31.Power Knowingly Accesses Facebook’s Computer Servers WithoutAuthorization...........................................................................................32.Power Circumvents Facebook’s Technological Blocking Measures..........3III.ARGUMENT..................................................................................................................4A.Judgment On The Pleadings Standard..................................................................4B.Power Has Violated California Penal Code 502(c)(1)-(4) and 502(c)(7)...............51.There Are No Facts In Dispute Regarding The Elements Of A502(c) Violation.......................................................................................52.Facebook’s Terms Of Use Are Enforceable As A Matter Of Law.............8C.Facebook Is Entitled To Injunctive Relief To Stop Power’s ImpermissibleAccess To Its Systems..........................................................................................9IV.CONCLUSION...............................................................................................................9
Case5:08-cv-05780-JW Document56 Filed12/23/09 Page3 of 15
Add a Comment