Schiff p2American Culturecountry was left in the dark and even more so, led astray as to what really occurred.In Iran, Eisenhower created a CIA led coup that was meant to overthrow thecurrent democratically elected Prime Minister, Muhammad Mussadiq. The conflict arosedue to the “nationalization of oil,” and how Mussadiq and Iran were “unable to export oildue to Western support for British claims” (Foran, 159). However, even more so thanthat, Mussadiq “sought to break with a history of dependency and Western influence inhis country’s economy and political affairs” (Foran, 181). Mussadiq’s want for Iran to beautonomous and break itself free on its Western ties was his demise as prime minister.Orchestrating the coup was a process. The CIA had worked on the Tudeh, acommunist party in Iran, and the Soviet influence in that region since the late 1940s(Foran, 177). “The CIA used propaganda, organized anti-Tudeh fighters, and paid peopleto attack with the Tudeh in sermons” (Foran, 178). All of this was in an effort to growdissent and force the coup. On the day of the coup, there was absolute chaos in the streetsof Tehran that was orchestrated by the CIA, and finally “a nine-hour battle was fought atMussadiq’s home in which three hundred people were killed,” but ultimately Zahidi became the prime minister just as the United States wanted.Clearly, this coup was just a motion set in place by the United States andEisenhower’s Administration, but the American public, echoing Bullwinkle’s earlier critique, knew a far different story. “The mainstream media saw the coup as ‘a whollyinternal matter brought about by widespread dissatisfaction with the ineptitude of Mosaddeq’” (Foran, 178). This was the image that all of the media portrayed, including
Newsweek
,
The Washington Post
,
The Christian Science Monitor
, and
The New York Times
. These are all very reputable publications and they all depicted a story that was far
Add a Comment