High Quality
Open the downloaded document, and select print from the file menu (PDF reader required).
WEDNESDAY, 26 MAY 2010
is LACC's district counsel trying to suppress my coverage of the underageharassment scandal? sheila dharod has helped the victim file charges againstthe ASO government official who allegedly harassed her and fed her alcoholon the ASO trip to sacramento.the victim dropped out of school.harassment messes up your life and your peace of mind. it messes up yoursense of safety. why do plenty of other campus orgs get to have facebooks get to play freespeech but now my IP viability is being shut down. what is this, the great firewall of LACC? just because i know how to manipulate google indexing through repetitionand key words my blog floats to the top for many google searches. say search"harassment" and "LACC." why doesn't eric kim write google and tell them he thinks blogger is a badidea and we shouldn't let non-PHD's have ideas in public.and maybe he should tell jack dorsey that twitter should go down. or like any other company, he could just buy me. buy:http://twitter.com/LACCharassor tell that wild and crazy guy zuckerberg that Facebook is making LACC look bad. so please can we justTURN OFF THE INTERNET????????http://www.facebook.com/#!/profile.php?id=100001079162018and what about my youtube channel. shouldn't he get all mad that youtubeexists? and bambuser?i really just think i and sheila dharod should be publicly executed or tarredand feathered on LACC's quad to punish us for fighting this school's laziness
and corruption. we are fighting for women to be free from harassment and as women, toexist, and to have a voice of some kind. i want to help everybody. as we arerelegated to the blogosphere in some ways while our predominantly maleprofessors have paid jobs protecting/issuing harassment/epithets . . . wellgood thing they have eric kim to try to convince me about intellectualproperty notions . . .this is how i feel about IP: all wrongs reserved! copyleft!domain name law is so new and so wild, i am not so silly.i think eric needs to write google, but i am not a lawyer, despite beingobsessed with cyberlaw. tell them, wawa.there's nothing like a good gag order!i just would like to request a comprehensive and thorough gag order.so, dear LACC gen couns. please give me the works!!! ask me to gut my youtube!http://www.youtube.com/user/maryeng1this is what needs to get covered up:one that covers all my youtube videos mentioning the name LACC, my twittermy fafafafafaffacebook (yes i really i really don't like facebook, i'm just tryingto more adequately kiss up to accel, in-q-tel, and narus insight . . . and getsurveilled/crunched/commodified) what about this website that grabbed my copyleft youtube of the creepy extraction of sheila dharod.http://videos.apnicommunity.com/Video,Item,1488035855.htmlthey are making ad-rev off LACC harassment. at least they are turning it intosomething positive:$total human liberationfree your mind from hatred be freefree from violent speechinequality
free humanity http://www.flickr.com/photos/freehumanity/
POSTED BY PLEASE AT0 COMMENTS LINKS TO THIS POST
now i don't necessarily endorse the personal way this is said. but what i likeis that fink notices the double standard of free speech for sexism, but zerospeech for women.i might say it differently.he wrote me this afternoon:
"This guy is a hypocrite and a coward. Let's see he can hide behind the FirstAmendment so can spew his sexist speech but you don't have the same FirstAmendment right to speak about what you find objectionable about his speech. He isa real tough guy when he corners a student and threatens her with the pain of suspension from exercising her rights but when the student retains a lawyer andchallenges his legal right to censor the students speech he gets riles up, spewsnonsense (jump in a pool) and then clams up."
listen to the mp4 of the coercive "mandatory" meeting with threatenedsuspension. sorry about my long introduction.http://bambuser.com/channel/laccequalitycoalition/broadcast/779728the main highlights:eckfordmain points:1. you are inappropriate2. you do not have a PHD3. you have to stop activity online and writingthey said some funny things---like---all a teacher has is their reputation, so if it is damaged ....they are so funny because on the one hand they defend the use of thelanguage---but if i report it they are totally humiliated and embarrassedi really want fink to represent sheila dharod v. LACC ASO.
Add a Comment