I
T IS A PROBLEM
in most parts of theglobe—the increasing expense of litigation andovercrowded court dockets. Various measureshave been adopted to deal with this situationin the United States and elsewhere. One of the most important is mediation, sometimesreferred to as alternate or alternative disputeresolution. There are various forms of media-tion, but typically the procedure involves a con-sensual, out-of-court settlement that is muchless costly and time-consuming than cases sentto trial.The proponents of mediation, however,advocate the procedure not only because iteases court backlogs but also because it servesthe interests of justice in and of itself, mostsaliently some types of civil disputes—every-thing from family disagreements to ethnic strife.In recent years, mediation—court-supervisedmediation in particular—has become morecommonplace in the United States and, in manystates, the procedure is becoming increasinglystandard practice.This journal looks at mediation in generalas well as the various trends that may accountfor its growing popularity. In the opening arti-cle, Hiram Chodosh, a law professor and direc-tor of the Frederick K. Cox International LawCenter at Case Western Reserve UniversitySchool of Law, explores the diverse features of mediation and how it can be tailored to meet theneeds of nations with widely different culturesand traditions.Robert A. Goodin, president of the boardof directors of the Institute for the Study andDevelopment of Legal Systems, deals with prag-matic questions in his overview article on medi-ation. He looks at the specifics of the processand shows how it has reduced the burden of expensive litigation in the U.S., a country inwhich the costs of justice have skyrocketed inrecent years.
2
From the Editors
Mediation and the Courts