Re: USFWS requesting info for Hidalgo Co. project
Tuesday, February 26, 2008 5:33:29 PM
Go to release to FWS for their interual use only - pls state on any cover memo and maps if possible -loren----- Original Message -----From:To: FLOSSMAN, LOREN W;Cc:Sent: Tue Feb 26 17:30:20 2008Subject: FW: USFWS requesting info for Hidalgo Co. projectThere is no problem with providing this type of info, correct? Did we put that 24 need for abiological report on I don’t know the specific on the road surface. The gates should bepresented to him as tentative if we haven’t nailed down the locations. needs to get back withhim pretty quick. Thanks. ________________________________ From:Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 5:22 PMTo:Subject: USFWS requesting info for Hidalgo Co. projectthe local Endanger Species Biologist for US Fish and Wildlife called asking for informationregarding the Hidalgo Co. project such as the type of road (gravel, dirt ect) that is being proposed forthe south side of the wall (hydraulic structure) and width of the road. He was also requesting theaccess points (gates or ramps) that we are proposing. He said that he was given 24 hrs by DC toprovide some sort of a Biological report regarding the Hidalgo Co project. I advised him that the accesspoints are going to be revisited and we do not have a definite answer for the road on the south side of the levee, but it will be placed within the current IBWC easement,. What info can we give him if any?FYI After our meeting with the Hidalgo Co. officials yesterday, wanted us to go back and look atevery ramp that is currently crossing the levee within the proposed hydraulic structure and see whattype of impact our proposed gates will have on the landowners. There are a few gates that havechanged from the original PF 225 gates that we had strategically selected that we shared with USFWS inNovember.
( (b) (6)(b) (6)(b) (6)
(b) (6)(b) (6)(b) (6)(b) (6)(b)(6)(b) (6)(b) (6)(b) (6)(b) (6)(b) (6)(b) (6)(b) (6)