Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lois Balin
Urban Wildlife Biologist
Texas Parks and
Photo by Lois Balin Wildlife
Conservation Development
• Urban Ecology
• Conservation Development Process
• Conservation Subdivision Design Process
• Soils
• Hydrology
• Flora
• Fauna
• “Water-proofed” Ground
• Increased Run-Off
• Decreased Water Infiltration
Russian Thistle
Salt Cedar
Decrease
in Specialists and
Large Mammals
Photo by TPWD
Photos by TPWD
People Prefer the Sounds of
Nature
#1...
Birds
#3...
Singing
Wind
#2...
Moving
Water
OTHERS:
• Less maintenance more access
• Permanent open vistas
• Natural resource amenities
• Wildlife!
• Regional
• County
• Municipal
• Local
• Project
• Lot
C.E.D.A.R. Method
C cultural
A agricultural
R recreational
Sumner Swaner E ecological
(D developmental)
Create Overlays of
Resources and Flexible
Zoning
Regional Example
Cemeteries
Historic
Farmstead
Cultural
Drawing by John Davis Historic Sites, Views, etc.
Drawing by John Davis Agricultural
Prime Farmland, etc.
Recreational
Drawing by John Davis
Active Parks, Golf, etc.
Riparian Habitat
(Arroyos, Floodplain)
Desert Grasslands
Desert Scrub
High
Medium
Low
Density
Placement
Drawing by John Davis
Zoned for Overall Density of 2 Acre Lots
100 Acres = 50 lots
•Extensive “Fragmentation”
•Maintain 2 Acres, Access 2 Acres
•No Common “Good” (Trails, etc.)
•Minimal Fragmentation
•Maintain 1/2 Acre, Access 75.5 Acres
•Common “Good” (Trails, etc.)
High
Medium
Low
Density
Placement
Drawing by John Davis
“God smiles on ecological planners”
Ian McHarg
Design by Nature
Conservation Development
Process
I. PERFORM COMMUNITY AUDIT :
- Numerical Analysis of Development Trends
- Regulatory Evaluation
- Build-Out” Maps
26
24
4
3
23
6
8
9 11
22
21
7 10 17 19 20
12 13
18
14
13
15 16
Draft for Review and Discussion
8-30-06 Draft for Review and
13
City of El Paso Planning Dept.
Discussion
8-30-06
Conservation
1. PERFORMDevelopment
COMMUNITY AUDIT :
- Numerical Analysis of Development Trends
- Regulatory Evaluation
- Build-Out” Maps
•50 Acres
•Mostly Desert Scrub
•Cultural Sites
•Arroyos (floodplain)
Arroyo Desert
Scrub Floodplain
Historic Sites Stone Wall
•Arroyos
•Floodplains
•Cultural Sites
Arroyo Desert
Scrub Floodplain
Historic Sites Stone Wall
•Stone Wall
•Stone Wall
•Natural Desert Habitat Areas
Arroyo Desert
Scrub Floodplain
Historic Sites Stone Wall
Scenario 2
-2ac lots, 25 homes
Scenario 3
-Cons. Development
-25 homes
Scenario 4
-Mixed Use
-Conservation
Arroyo Desert
Scrub Floodplain
Historic Sites Stone Wall
•50 Acres
•5 ac lots
•10 homes
•3000ft2 home site
Arroyo Desert
Scrub Floodplain
Historic Sites Stone Wall
Pros:
•Avoids Most PCA’s
•Limited Fragmentation
•Saves Stone Walls
Cons:
•2 Arroyo Crossings
•No Common Amenities
•Own 5ac., Access 5ac.
•Infrastructure Cost
(bridges, roads, utilities)
•No Mixed Use
Arroyo Desert
Scrub Floodplain
Historic Sites Stone Wall
Drawing by John Davis
First Scenario
Version 2
Cons:
•6 Arroyo Crossings
•Cuts Through PCA’s
•No Common Amenities
•Own 5ac., Access 5ac.
•No Mixed Use
•50 Acres
•2 ac lots
•25 homes
•3000ft2 home site
Pros:
•Avoids Most PCA’s
•Saves Stone Walls
•Increased Density
Cons:
•More Fragmentation
•4 Arroyo Crossings
•No Common Amenities
•Own 2ac., Access 2ac.
•High Infrastructure Cost
(bridges, roads, utilities)
•No Mixed Use
Cons. Development
Hik
•Avoids Most PCA’s and SCA’s
ing
•Saves Stone Walls
Tra
il
•Increased Density
•Minimal Fragmentation Gazebo
•1 Arroyo Crossing
•Common Amenities
•Own ~1/4ac., Access ~44ac.
•Low Infrastructure Cost
(bridges, roads, utilities) Common
Open Space
Cons: (?)
•Smaller Lot Sizes
•No Mixed Use
Cons. Development
•Mixed Use
•1/4 ac lots or more
•25 homes
•3000ft2 home site
•Walk-friendly
•Community Comm.
•Natural Resources
•Quality of Life
Pros:
Hik
•Avoids Most PCA’s and SCA’s
ing
•Saves Stone Walls
Tra
•Increased Density
il
•Minimal Fragmentation
•1 Arroyo Crossing
•Common Amenities
•Own ~1/4ac., Access ~44ac.
•Low Infrastructure Cost Comm.
Cons: (?)
•Smaller Lot Sizes
•Commercial Impervious
Surface (?)
- Ian McHarg
“No
“Nocommunity
communityactively
activelyplans
plansto
tobecome
becomeaabland
blandsuburb
suburb
without
withoutopen
openspace.
space.However,
However,most
mostzoning
zoningcodes
codesprogram
program
exactly
exactlythis
thisoutcome.”
outcome.” Randall.
Randall.Arendt
Arendt
Differences in Zoning Approaches
R. Arendt’s Growing Greener Conservation by Design
• Conditional use verses Conservation by Design “By-Right”
• Minimum Tract Size
• Calculating Open Space
Traditional: 25 – 23% of gross tract area; % of total parcel acreage
Growing Greener: % of the net buildable land not constrained by
law
• Inadequate Lot Size Reduction Potential
•Traditional: Allow marginal reductions in lot size
•Growing Greener: Lot size minima almost irrelevant, both density
and open space are established in another way
Differences in Zoning Approaches,
cont.
• A New Look at Density Incentives
•Traditional: Density bonus incentives must be huge to work
•Growing Greener: “Earn” basic full standard density
through conservation design with significant open
space, standard becomes 50% open space
• The Modern Idea of “Density Disincentives”
•Discourages large-lot subdivisions by reducing overall density for
applicants electing not to participate in conservation design
• Requiring Conservation Design in Certain
Situations
18 2-acre Lots
Randal Arendt
Conservation Zoning:
A Menu of Choices
Option 1:
• Density Neutral
• 18 Lots
• 50% Open Space
Option 2:
• 25% Density
Bonus
• 24 Lots
• 60% Open Space
Option 3:
• 100% Density
Bonus
• 36 Lots
• 70% Open Space
Randal Arendt
Traditional Method of Subdivision Design
Density Calculations:
82.0 acres total
-17.0 acres Primary Conservation
Area
65.0 acres buildable land
remaining
-6.5 acres for streets (10%)
58.5 acres/80,000 ft2 per dwelling = 32
58.5
lots acres net
32 Homes
Randal Arendt
Density-Neutral Subdivision
with Minimum of 50% Open Space
• Identify the land to be preserved. Delineate
primary and secondary conservation areas
82 acres
Randal Arendt
4-Steps for Designing Conservation Subdivisio
Randal Arendt
Secondary Conservation Areas
Randal Arendt
4-Steps for Designing Conservation Subdivisio
Randal Arendt
Home site Placement
Density
Neutral!!
Still 32
Homes
Randal Arendt
Randal Arendt
Conservation Method of Sub-division Design
Randal Arendt
Traditional Development PERCENTAGE ACREAGE
36 lots
36 lots