Summary
The case of the Cyprus conflict differs radically from many other “conflicts”which are analyzed using post-conflict analysis because, unlike conflicts inplaces like Sri Lanka and El Salvador, the conflict in Cyprus is a frozen conflictwhich has devolved into a situation where two populations, Greek and TurkishCypriot, live in separate states – one recognized internationally, the other apariah state with no international recognition other than that of its patron – Turkey. The two states are almost completely mono-ethnic and theirexistence represent the end result of the use of population exchanges as amethod of halting, if not ending, conflict based on religion or ethnicity.When analyzing the Cyprus conflict’s peacebuilding phase we are thereforeleft with a situation which defies the neat analysis applied to other conflicts. Today a situation like the one is Cyprus exists nowhere in the world(excepting perhaps Abkhazia and South Ossetia). The Cyprus conflict is notan active, on-going conflict involving hostilities, it is not a conflict ended bythe military victory of one side or by a peace treaty acceptable to both sides.Because the conflict has lasted so long (since 1963 and in its most moderniteration, since the Turkish invasion of 1974) it has become not only a frozenconflict but one which is also stale
– lacking in new ideas, energy andinitiatives engendered to bring about a permanent solution to the problemsunderlying the situation. Analyzing the conflict, therefore, proves difficult
1
I will elaborate on the delineation of “stale” vs. “frozen” later in the report.
2
Add a Comment