Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Joan Swirsky - Who is Behind Quashing the Birth Certificate Issue

Joan Swirsky - Who is Behind Quashing the Birth Certificate Issue

Ratings: (0)|Views: 34 |Likes:
Published by Juan del Sur
Obama was born in 1961 — or perhaps in 1957, according to his MySpace page, which would make him 52, born supposedly in Hawaii before it became a state in 1959. So it was quite curious that not one cyber-sleuth could find an authentic, verifiable copy of his original vault copy birth certificate. I’m not talking about the faux version Obama posted on his website, which was deemed the real thing by FactCheck.org, a “truth”-detecting site that is sponsored by the Annenberg Foundation, the same foundation that hired Obama and his terrorist pal William Ayers and gave them millions of dollars for a research project in Chicago. In other words, the least credible source!

Even more significant is that no one in the media thought Obama’s missing birth certificate worth even casual mention. Their thinking seemed to be: If we’re not going to check on his eligibility to be president, then why question why the other crucial documents were — and continue to be — sealed? For instance: his baptism certificate; elementary, high school, college and graduate school transcripts; visa(s); selective service record; alleged multiple Social Security numbers; Illinois attorney’s license; Illinois State Senate records; law practice client list; Univ. of Chicago scholarly articles; financial records while a community organizer in Chicago; and medical records. I’m also curious about why Michelle Obama’s law license was suspended in 1993 by the Illinois Supreme Court, but then again she wasn’t running for president.

Instead, the media were frantically busy trying to divert public attention away from those pesky things known as credentials with gossip-driven tabloid reportage of Sarah Palin and Joe the Plumber in order to avoid the bigger-than-Watergate potential scandal of whether or not Obama was eligible — according to the U.S. Constitution—to become President of the United States!
Obama was born in 1961 — or perhaps in 1957, according to his MySpace page, which would make him 52, born supposedly in Hawaii before it became a state in 1959. So it was quite curious that not one cyber-sleuth could find an authentic, verifiable copy of his original vault copy birth certificate. I’m not talking about the faux version Obama posted on his website, which was deemed the real thing by FactCheck.org, a “truth”-detecting site that is sponsored by the Annenberg Foundation, the same foundation that hired Obama and his terrorist pal William Ayers and gave them millions of dollars for a research project in Chicago. In other words, the least credible source!

Even more significant is that no one in the media thought Obama’s missing birth certificate worth even casual mention. Their thinking seemed to be: If we’re not going to check on his eligibility to be president, then why question why the other crucial documents were — and continue to be — sealed? For instance: his baptism certificate; elementary, high school, college and graduate school transcripts; visa(s); selective service record; alleged multiple Social Security numbers; Illinois attorney’s license; Illinois State Senate records; law practice client list; Univ. of Chicago scholarly articles; financial records while a community organizer in Chicago; and medical records. I’m also curious about why Michelle Obama’s law license was suspended in 1993 by the Illinois Supreme Court, but then again she wasn’t running for president.

Instead, the media were frantically busy trying to divert public attention away from those pesky things known as credentials with gossip-driven tabloid reportage of Sarah Palin and Joe the Plumber in order to avoid the bigger-than-Watergate potential scandal of whether or not Obama was eligible — according to the U.S. Constitution—to become President of the United States!

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: Juan del Sur on Jun 10, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/18/2010

pdf

text

original

 
Joan Swirsky – Who is Behind Quashing the Birth Certificate Issue?Page 1 of 8
 Who Is Behind Quashing the Birth CertificateIssue?
Just who has been sending "the message"? Author:
 Joan Swirsky
 Date: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/14089Back in October of 2008, when the subject of Obama’s Constitutional eligibility to be presidentof the United States was just a blip on the radar screen of public awareness, I wrote an article
1
 about how easy it was to find my then 92-year-old mother’s birth certificate.Frankly, I didn’t think finding my mother’s birth certificate was possible, given the fact that shehad been born in a farmhouse in Storrs, CT, along with nine of her 10 siblings, to parents whodidn’t speak English. Despairing that she would never be “qualified” to receive the care [in anursing home] that she desperately needed, I set about to find the document, which I was surehad vanished in the unreliable record-keeping of 1913. When I called the third number, Iexplained to the woman who answered the phone that I was “asking something impossible.” Igave her my mother’s first name and her father’s last name. Within four minutes, she said,“Here it is!” When I expressed my amazement, the woman said: “That’s nothing… we’reroutinely asked to find birth certificates from the 1800s, and we do that all the time!” Totaltime it took me to find my mother’s 1913, born-in-a-farmhouse birth certificate:
10 minutes!
 
Obama was born not in 1913, like my mother, but in 1961 — or perhaps in 1957, according tohis MySpace page,
2
which would make him 52, born supposedly in Hawaii
 before
it became astate in 1959. So it was quite curious that not one cyber-sleuth could find an authentic, verifiable copy of his original vault copy birth certificate. I’m not talking about the faux versionObama posted on his website, which was deemed the real thing by FactCheck.org, a “truth”-detecting site that is sponsored by the Annenberg Foundation, the same foundation that hiredObama and his terrorist pal William Ayers and gave them millions of dollars for a researchproject in Chicago. In other words, the least credible source!Even more significant is that no one in the media thought Obama’s missing birth certificate worth even casual mention. Their thinking seemed to be: If we’re not going to check on hiseligibility to be president, then why question why the other crucial documents were — andcontinue to be — sealed? For instance: his baptism certificate; elementary, high school, collegeand graduate school transcripts; visa(s); selective service record; alleged multiple SocialSecurity numbers; Illinois attorney’s license; Illinois State Senate records; law practice clientlist; Univ. of Chicago scholarly articles; financial records while a community organizer inChicago; and medical records. I’m also curious about why Michelle Obama’s law license wassuspended in 1993 by the Illinois Supreme Court, but then again she wasn’t running forpresident.Instead, the media were frantically busy trying to divert public attention away from those pesky things known as credentials with gossip-driven tabloid reportage of Sarah Palin and Joe the
 
Joan Swirsky – Who is Behind Quashing the Birth Certificate Issue?Page 2 of 8
Plumber in order to avoid the bigger-than-Watergate potential scandal of whether or notObama was eligible — according to the U.S. Constitution—to become President of the UnitedStates!
NOW WE KNOW WHY 
In an explosive interview by Dr. Laurie Roth on her syndicated West Coast radio show on August 7
th
, [2009] Douglas Hagmann — a respected journalist, director of the NortheastIntelligence Network 
3
and longtime private investigator, and Judi McLeod, a prolific journalistand the managing editor of 
Canada Free Press
4
— the reason for the media blackout aboutthe birth-certificate issue was nothing less than organized Mafia-like dire threats to membersof the media issued not only from the heads of major TV and radio stations but also fromFederal Communication Commission officials! According to Hagmann and McLeod, who conducted a nine-month investigation anddocumented their findings scrupulously, after Obama was elected but before he wasinaugurated: A major TV talk-show host reported that he was ordered not to raise the birthcertificate issue or risk losing his job.FCC officials threatened to yank broadcasting licenses, break up conglomerates,and make the enactment of the Fairness Doctrine “look mild” in comparison toother consequences.In at least one corporate TV headquarters, memos were circulated to all on-airemployees not to mention the birth certificate issue, as well as other specificsubjects like Obama’s Illinois lawyer’s license, his college records, etc., under bothimplied and explicit threats.During the interview, Hagmann and McLeod—who never mentioned a particular network by name—alluded to e-mails and other evidence in their possession, copies of which, they said, were secreted in several locations. But they did tantalize listeners with descriptions of meeting with “sources” outside of St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New York City, a high-placed contactlooking nervously over his shoulder, references to directives and warnings given by “those atthe top,” and the undisguised threat of one executive to his underlings: “This is serious, and so will the consequences be if anyone chooses not to be a team player with this.”This comes as no surprise to Fox watchers who have noticed that the Stalinist-style censorshipof the Obama regime is already here. This couldn’t possibly be because of the healthy shares of stock the Saudis bought in Fox, could it? If so, why would the Saudis care so much aboutquashing potentially damning revelations about Obama? Have they also bought shares inObama?Come to think of it, who exactly paid the tuition for Obama’s stint at Harvard Law School? What role did Obama’s long-time friend, Khalid al-Mansour, a key advisor to a Saudi billionaire, play? Writer Kenneth Timmerman describes al-Mansour as “well known within the black community as a lawyer, an orthodox Muslim, a black nationalist, an author, aninternational deal-maker, an educator, and an outspoken enemy of Israel.” This is not to omitthat al-Mansour was originally contacted to intervene with Harvard on Obama’s behalf by 
 
Joan Swirsky – Who is Behind Quashing the Birth Certificate Issue?Page 3 of 8
Percy Sutton, former Manhattan Borough President and the lawyer of Malcolm X. Ah…thetangled web of it all!Then there is the question of what role was played by Saudi Prince Alwaleed, the nephew of King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia? You remember Prince Alwaleed, who offered then-Mayor Rudy Giuliani $10 million after September 11 if he would only blame America for the terrorist attacksof which 15 of 19 perpetrators were Saudi Arabian—a “gift” the mayor promptly and withappropriate contempt rejected!In short, what influence have the Saudis exerted on Fox to muzzle the issue of Obama’s birthcertificate? I don’t ask this about the network TV channels or cable channels like CNN andMSNBC, which are still issuing daily hagiographies of Obama.
TIP OF THE ICEBERG
Just who has been sending “the message”? And how did it permeate not only the media, butalso the once-respected U.S. Congress and the courts of our land, including the once-incorruptible Supreme Court? And what menacing forces made the once-courageousconservative media abandon their mission to expose rank corruption and collusion?Two words: Money Talks!If you’re a media mogul and you get word from the FCC that your license will be pulledimmediately and irrevocably if you mention only three words — Obama’s birth certificate —poof! You send that word to your employees and tell them that their mega-salaries—in fact,their employment — are on the line.If you’re a conservative talk-show host and you get your boss’s directive not to dare to mentiononly three words — Obama’s birth certificate — poof! Lips sealed; curiosity zero!If the money thing doesn’t work, there’s always the threat thing, i.e., “going public” about taxrecords, health status, or family secrets. Or be audited by the IRS. Or be investigated by any number of regulatory agencies. And if the money thing and the threat thing don’t work, how about being
reminded
of all those“accidents” and “unfortunate incidents” — broken kneecaps, missing children, “falls” from buildings, punctured tires — that resulted not in joblessness or embarrassment but in death? We know that’s how the Mafia works. It’s also how political machines work. It’s also how community organizers work. Wasn’t it Obama himself who in 2008 said “
If They Bring aKnife…We Bring a Gun
5
and in 2009 advised his followers to “
Get in Their Faces!
”?
6
 So determined are Obama’s handlers to keep the facts of his parentage and place of birth out of the public domain that, as writer Chelsea Schilling has scrupulously documented,
7
 “the Federal Election Commission shows Obama’s campaign has made regularpayments to Perkins Coie since Jan. 1, 2007—the month he formed a presidentialexploratory committee and only weeks before he formally announced hiscandidacy for president — [and up to the present] — has paid Perkins Coie, a singlelaw firm, $2.3 million…to crush eligibility lawsuits.”

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->