/  15
CIVIL COVER SHEET
Clark County, Nevada
Case No.--
(Assigned by Clerk's Office)
A-I0-618291-C
VIII
I.Party Information
Plaintiff(s) (name/address/phone):
GLOBALVERGE,
INC.,a Nevada Corporation
Attorney (name/address/phone):
Brian R. Hardy, Esq. (NV Bar No.1 0068)
Marquis& Aurbach
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89145
(702) 382-0711
Defendant( s) (name/address/phone):
DERRICK L. RODGERS,an individual; PEOPLE HELPING
PEOPLE, INC
Attorney (name/address/phone):
II. Nature of Controversy(Please check applicable bold category and
applicable subcategory,if appropriate)
DArbitration Requested
Civil Cases
RealProperty
Torts
DLandlordffenant
DUnlawfu1 Detainer
oTitle to Property
DForeclosure
DLiens
oQuiet Title
oSpecific Performance
oCondemnation/Eminent Domain
DOther Real Property
DPartition
oPlanning/Zoning
Negligence
DNegligence - Auto
DNegligence - MedicallDental
DNegligence - Premises Liability
(Slip/FalJ)
oNegligence - Other
oProduct Liability
DProduct LiabilitylMotor Vehicle
oOther TortslProduct Liability
DIntentional Misconduct
DTorts/Defamation (Libel/Slander)
DInterfere with Contract Rights
DEmployment Torts(Wrongful termination)
DOther Torts
DAnti-trust
oFraud/Misrepresentation
oInsurance
DLegal Tort
oUnfair Competition
Probate
Other Civil Filing Types
Estimated Estate Value: __
DSummary Administration
oGeneral Administration
DSpecial Administration
DSet Aside Estates
DTrust/Conservatorships
oIndividual Trustee
oCorporate Trustee
oOther Probate
DConstruction Defect
DChapter 40
oGeneral
~ Breach of Contract
DBuilding& Construction
DInsurance Carrier
oCommercial Instrument
oOther Contracts/ Acct/Judgment
DCollectionof Actions
~ EmploymentContract
oGuarantee
oSale Contract
oUniformCommercial Code
oCivil Petition for Judicial Review
oForeclosure Mediation
oOther Administrative Law
oDepartment of Motor Vehicles
DWorker's Compensation Appeal
oAppeal from Lower Court(also check
applicable civil case box)
DTransfer from Justice Court
DJustice Court Civil Appeal
oCivil Writ
DOther Special Proceeding
DOther Civil Filing
oCompromise of Minor's Claim
oConversion of Property
DDamage to Property
DEmployment Security
oEnforcement of Judgment
DForeign Judgment - Civil
oOther Personal Property
DRecovery of Property
DStockho1der Suit
DOther Civil Matters
III. Business Court Requested(Please check appJicab1ecategory;for Clark or Washoe Counties only.)
D
NRS Chapters 78-88
D
Investments (NRS 104Art. 8)
D
D
Commodities (NRS 90)
0
Deceptive Trade Practices (NRS 598)
D
o
Securities (NRS 90)
0
Trademarks (NRS 600A)
June 8,2010
Date
Enhanced Case Mgmt/Business
Other Business Court Matters
NevadaAOe - Planning and Analysis Division
M&A:1l429-0031065275
i.noc6/8/20109:27 AM
or representative
Form PA 20]
Rev.2.0E
1
Marquis & Aurbach
AVECE M. HIGBEE, ESQ.
2
Nevada Bar No. 3739
BRIAN R. HARDY, ESQ.
3
Nevada Bar No. 10068
1000 1Park Run Drive
4
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
(702)382-0711
5
(702) 382-5816Facsimile
ahigbee@ marquisaurbach.com
6
bhardy@ marquisaurbach.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
78
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Electronically Filed
06/08/201001:24:03 PM
CLERK OF THE COURT
DISTRICT COURT
CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA
vs.
COMPLAINT
EXEMPT FROM ARBITRATION
(Request for Injunctive Relief)
GLOBAL VERGE, INC.,a Nevada Corporation,
Plaintiff,
A-I0-618291-C
Case No.:
Dept. No.VI I I
DERRICK L. RODGERS, an individual;
PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE, INC.; and Roe
Corporations I through X, and Does I through X,
inclusive
Defendants.

Plaintiff, Globalverge, Inc. ("Global Verge"), by and through its counsel of record, Marquis& Aurbach, hereby claims against Defendants Derrick L. Rodgers ("Rodgers") and People Helping People, Inc. ("PHP") and alleges as follows:

JURISDICTIONAL ALLEGATIONS
1.
Plaintiff Global Verge is and was at all times relevant, a Nevada corporation
conducting business in Clark County, Nevada.
2.

Defendant Rodgers is and was an independent contractor for Global Vergeup to and until November 16, 2009 and who executed a Non-Disclosure / Non-Circumvent Agreement with Global Verge on or about July30, 2009.

3.
Defendant
PHP isa foreign corporation
conducting
business online at
http.z/www.teamgg.com
andhttp://www.phpico.com
which is a direct competitor of Global
Verge that has retained the services of Defendant Rodgers as itsCEO.
Page 1 of 11
M&A:11429~003 I063539_l.DOC6/8/20]01:30
PM
1
4.
The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate, or
2
otherwise of the Defendants named herein as DOES I through X, inclusive, and ROE
3
CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive, are unknown to Plaintiff at this time. Therefore
4
Plaintiff sues said Defendants by fictitious names and will ask the Court to amend this Complaint
5
to show the true names and capacities of each DOE and ROE Defendant as such time when the
6
same are ascertained. Said DOE and ROE Defendants are responsible for damages suffered by
7
Plaintiff, therefore, Plaintiff sues said Defendants by such fictitious names.
8
STATEMENT OF FACTS
9
5.
Global Verge provides products and services through a unique business model
10
which allows individuals and companies to purchase products at wholesale and sell any or all of
11
the products from a retail store. Global Verge enlists certain qualified individuals as independent
12
contractors.
However, given its unique business model and online presence, Global Verge
o ~13
< ~
""'"
'r"Ioo
jooIooI
U:!('f")
14
~ .e0'1N
~ 0eo0
<c: ~C
_~~ ~~ 15
Q('Jt;3z~~
fJ)~~
......
16
""""".....00_
~ 8>~
I-"0
I
01.....
~ &J
17
~
,_l~
<
g
~
c18

19
20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
maintains certain confidential and proprietary information.
6.

Defendant Rodgers was provided access to and maintained some, if not all, of Global Verge's confidential and proprietary information. However, prior to providing Defendant Rodgers with access to its confidential and proprietary information, Global Verge entered into a Non-Disclosure / Non-Circumvent Agreement (the "NDA") with Defendant Rodgers on or about July 30, 2009. A copy of the NDA is attached hereto as Exhibit 1.

7.
Section 3 of the NDA entitled Non-DisclosurelNon-Circumvent
provides:

Receiving Party will not disclose the Confidential Information of the Disclosing Part, except as is expressly authorized by the Agreement. Each Receiving Party may disclose the Confidential Information of Disclosing Party to its own employees assisting in making an evaluation of the Confidential Information; provided, however, that such employees are advised of the confidentiality and no- use obligations hereunder and are legally obligated by written agreement or otherwise to maintain the confidentiality

and non..use of the Confidential
Information.

In no event will a Receiving Party disclose Confidential Information to third parties unless it obtains the prior written consent of Disclosing Party; provided, that prior to any such disclosure, Receiving Party shall first obtain a written non-disclosure agreement from such third party containing terms and conditions substantially similar to those set forth herein.

If requested, a copy of such executed agreement will be provided to Disclosing Party. In addition, if there are three or more parties to the Agreement, then Confidential Information may be shared among multiple Receiving Parties, unless Disclosing Party provides a written notice restricting such sharing of information.

Page 2 of 11
M&A: 11429-003 1063539_l.DOC6/8/2010 1:30 PM

Share & Embed

More from this user

Add a Comment

Characters: ...