Professional Documents
Culture Documents
vs.
4
RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., et al., Case No. 2:10-CV-492 CW
clo
Defendants.
The court held a hearing on this matter on June 10, 2010. For the reasons to be explained
su
in a memorandum decision that the court shall file shortly, the court ORDERS as follows:
Defendants’ motion to vacate the Utah state court’s preliminary injunction order (Dkt.
fra
Defendants’ motion to expedite the hearing (Dkt. No. 23) is moot; and
consideration of Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. No. 26) is
ud
deferred.
The preliminary injunction of May 22, 2010 issued by the Utah state court is hereby
.o
_____________________________
Clark Waddoups
United States District Judge
w.
4 clo
su
re
fra
ud
.o
rg