Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Management
Arash 1
Dec isi on sci ence for
Management
Arash Najmaei
Arash.unity@gmail
Arash.unity@yahoo.com
H/P : 0172116875
Arash 2
Text Books…
• David R. Anderson, Dennis J. Sweeney, & Thomas
A. Williams, (2003), Introduction to Management
Science, Quantitative Approaches to Decision
Making, 10th Edition West Publishing Company.
Session Synopsis:
Linear Programming
Requirements of a linear
programming problem
Formulating linear programming
problems
Graphical solution to linear
programming :
maximization problems
Linear Programming
• Linear Programming (LP) is a
mathematical procedure for
determining optimal allocation of
scarce resources.
AM1
AX 1 + Aresource
are AMnXn=BM
M2X2 + ... +requirements for each of the
ij
related (Xj) decision variables.
80
60
40
20
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
120 Electronics
Department
100
Assembly
80
Department
60
40
20
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Number of Walkmans (X1)
Step 6 – Calculate optimized
value
Plug in values for X1 and X2
• Decision variables
– mathematical symbols representing levels of activity of
an operation
• Objective function
– a linear relationship reflecting the objective of an
operation
– most frequent objective of business firms is to maximize
profit
– most frequent objective of individual operational units
(such as a production or packaging department) is to
minimize cost
• Constraint
– a linear relationship representing a restriction on
decision making
Copyright 2006 John
Wiley & Sons, Inc.
LP Model Formulation (cont.)
subject to:
a11x1 + a12x2 + ... + a1nxn (≤, =, ≥) b1
a21x1 + a22x2 + ... + a2nxn (≤, =, ≥) b2
:
am1x1 + am2x2 + ... + amnxn (≤, =, ≥) bm
xj = decision variables
bi = constraint levels
cj = objective function coefficients
aij = constraint coefficients
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
Labor Clay Revenue
PRODUCT (hr/unit) (lb/unit) ($/unit)
Bowl 1 4 40
Mug 2 3 50
Decision variables
x1 = number of bowls to produce
x2 = number of mugs to produce
Copyright 2006 John
Wiley & Sons, Inc.
LP Formulation: Example
Maximize Z = $40 x1 + 50 x2
Subject to
x1 + 2x2 ≤ 40 hr (labor constraint)
4x1 + 3x2 ≤ 120 lb (clay constraint)
x1 , x2 ≥ 0
40 –
4 x1 + 3 x2 ≤ 120 lb
30 –
20 –
Area common to
both constraints
10 –
0– x1 + 2 x2 ≤ 40 hr
| | | | | |
10 20 30 40 50 60 x1
Copyright 2006 John
Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Computing Optimal Values
x1 + 2x2 = 40
x2
4x1 + 3x2 = 120
40 –
4 x1 + 3 x2 ≤ 120 lb 4x1 + 8x2 = 160
30 – -4x1 - 3x2 = -120
5x2 = 40
20 –
x2 = 8
10 – x1 + 2 x2 ≤ 40 hr
x1 + 2(8) = 40
0– x1 = 24
8
| | 24 | | x1
10 20 30 40
Z = $50(24) + $50(8) = $1,360
Copyright 2006 John
Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Extreme Corner Points
x1 = 0 bowls
x2 x2 = 20 mugs
x1 = 224 bowls
Z = $1,000
x2 = 8 mugs
40 –
x1 = 30 bowls
Z = $1,360
30 – x2 = 0 mugs
20 – A Z = $1,200
10 – B
| | | C|
0–
10 20 30 40 x1
30 – Z = 70x1 + 20x2
Optimal point:
x1 = 30 bowls
20 –
A x2 = 0 mugs
Z = $2,100
10 –
B
0–
x1 + 2x2 ≤ 40 hr
| | | C |
10 20 30 40 x1
Copyright 2006 John
Supplement 13-30
Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Minimization Problem
CHEMICAL CONTRIBUTION
Brand Nitrogen (lb/bag) Phosphate (lb/bag)
Gro-plus 2 4
Crop-fast 4 3
subject to
2x1 + 4x2 ≥ 16 lb of nitrogen
4x1 + 3x2 ≥ 24 lb of phosphate
x1, x2 ≥ 0
Copyright 2006 John
Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Graphical Solution
x2
14 – x1 = 0 bags of Gro-plus
x2 = 8 bags of Crop-fast
12 –
Z = $24
10 –
A
8– Z = 6x1 + 3x2
6–
4–
B
2–
C
| | | | | | |
0–
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 x1
Copyright 2006 John
Supplement 13-32
Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Example 1: Maximization Problem
Wyndor Glass
Company
Questions….