High Quality
Open the downloaded document, and select print from the file menu (PDF reader required).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
THE DOWCHEMICAL
COMPANY,
)
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. )
)
C.A. No. 05-737 (JJP)
NOV
A
CHEMICALS
CORPORATION )
(CANADA), and
NOV
A
CHEMICALS
INC.
)
(DELA
WARE),
)
)
Defendants. )
VERDICT FORM
Case 1:05-cv-00737-JJF Document 526 Filed 06/15/10 Page 1 of 4
------
-----
------
-----
------
-----
-------
,
.
I.
INFRINGEMENT QUESTIONS
(1)
Did
Dow prove
by a preponderance
of
the evidence
that FPs016
category polymersinfringe any claim
of
the
Asserted Patents?No:
_____
_Yes:(For
Dow)
(For
NOVA)
(2) Did
Dowprove by
a preponderance
of
the evidence
thatFPs
117 category polymersinfringe any claim
of
the
Asserted Patents?Yes:
V
No:(For Dow)(For
NOVA)
(3) Did
Dow prove by
a preponderance
of
the evidence that
FPs317
category polymersinfringe any claim
ofthe
Asserted Patents?Yes: No:(For
Dow)
(For
NOVA)
(4) Did
Dow prove
by a preponderance
of
the evidence that
NOVA's
XJS polymersinfringe a claim
of
the Asserted Patents?Yes: No:(For
Dow)
(For
NOVA)
2
Case 1:05-cv-00737-JJF Document 526 Filed 06/15/10 Page 2 of 4
------
-------
II.
INVALIDITY
QUESTIONS
(5)
Did
NOVA
prove
by
clear and convincing evidence that the Asserted Patents areinvalid because they lack an adequate written description
of
the claimed invention?Yes:
No:_~V
__
_
(For NOVA)(For Dow)
(6)
Did
NOVA
prove by clear
and
convincing evidence that the claims
of
the AssertedPatents are invalid because the claims are indefinite?Yes:No:
~
------
---=----
(For NOVA)(For Dow)
(7)
Did NOV A prove by clear and convincing evidence that the claims
of
AssertedPatents
are
invalid because the invention defined
in
the claims
of
the Asserted Patents would havebeen obvious to a person
of
ordinary skill
in
the field
of
the invention
as
of
the date
of
the invention?Yes:No:(For NOVA)(For Dow)
Case 1:05-cv-00737-JJF Document 526 Filed 06/15/10 Page 3 of 4
Add a Comment