Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Paul Vallely - A Practical Plan to Secure the Borders

Paul Vallely - A Practical Plan to Secure the Borders

Ratings: (0)|Views: 42|Likes:
Published by Juan del Sur
Since the Mexican Independence from Spain in 1821, there has always been the question of who owned what in the West. Since invading the New World, Spain controlled a vast territory that included all of modern-day Mexico all the way through California and Utah, not to mention Texas, Arizona, and New Mexico. Arguments go in many directions, but the fact of the matter is that in 1846, President Polk called for the invasion of Mexico. It was a bloody war, based mostly on the principle of “Manifest Destiny,” but it was also based on the principle that Colonialism left a void of epic proportions in the West, and the areas that Spain once controlled were nothing more than a set of violent fiefdoms.

Expansion into the West by Americans and many other peoples from across the globe meant that the USA of the day was going to have take control of the lawlessness and bitter disputes over the land Spain had to give up. Spain never did recognize the Independence, and if not for a coup in Spain, Mexico might still have been part of Spain. One must remember that in those days, it was Spain that had conquered everything and pillaged all its wealth.
Since the Mexican Independence from Spain in 1821, there has always been the question of who owned what in the West. Since invading the New World, Spain controlled a vast territory that included all of modern-day Mexico all the way through California and Utah, not to mention Texas, Arizona, and New Mexico. Arguments go in many directions, but the fact of the matter is that in 1846, President Polk called for the invasion of Mexico. It was a bloody war, based mostly on the principle of “Manifest Destiny,” but it was also based on the principle that Colonialism left a void of epic proportions in the West, and the areas that Spain once controlled were nothing more than a set of violent fiefdoms.

Expansion into the West by Americans and many other peoples from across the globe meant that the USA of the day was going to have take control of the lawlessness and bitter disputes over the land Spain had to give up. Spain never did recognize the Independence, and if not for a coup in Spain, Mexico might still have been part of Spain. One must remember that in those days, it was Spain that had conquered everything and pillaged all its wealth.

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, History
Published by: Juan del Sur on Jun 18, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

06/17/2010

pdf

text

original

 
Paul Vallely – A Practical, Operational Plan to Secure the BordersPage 1 of 5
 A PRACTICAL, OPERATIONAL PLAN TOSECURE THE BORDERS
 War on the Southern Border
 Author:
Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely 
 Date: Jun. 17, 2010http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/06/17/war-on-the-southern-border/ 
President James K. Polk advocated westward expansion and presided over the Mexican-American War following the annexation of Texas in 1845.
(Jun. 17, 2010) — Since the Mexican Independence from Spain in 1821,
1
there has always been the question of who owned what in the West. Since invading the New World, Spaincontrolled a vast territory that included all of modern-day Mexico all the way throughCalifornia and Utah, not to mention Texas, Arizona, and New Mexico. Arguments go in many directions, but the fact of the matter is that in 1846, President Polk called for the invasion of Mexico. It was a bloody war, based mostly on the principle of “Manifest Destiny,” but it wasalso based on the principle that Colonialism left a void of epic proportions in the West, andthe areas that Spain once controlled were nothing more than a set of violent fiefdoms.Expansion into the West by Americans and many other peoples from across the globe meantthat the USA of the day was going to have take control of the lawlessness and bitter disputesover the land Spain had to give up. Spain never did recognize the Independence, and if not fora coup in Spain, Mexico might still have been part of Spain. One must remember that in thosedays, it was Spain that had conquered everything and pillaged all its wealth.
 
Paul Vallely – A Practical, Operational Plan to Secure the BordersPage 2 of 5
By the treaty of “Guadalupe-Hidalgo,”
2
signed February 2, 1848, at the close of the Mexican War, the Republic of Mexico was compelled to abandon its claim to Texas and to cede to theUnited States the territory now comprising most of New Mexico, Arizona, California,Colorado, Utah and Nevada. The territory ceded to the United States by Mexico constitutedabout 200,000 square miles, or two-fifths of all her territory.In return for this vast territory, the United States gave $15,000,000 and assumedresponsibility for paying $3,000,000 in claims of American citizens against the MexicanGovernment. Further, in an attempt to find a better way to transport displaced Indian tribes,James Gadsden,
3
on behalf of President Franklin Pierce, purchased a huge swath of land below the Gila River from Santa Ana, who as Dictator of Mexico was deposed soon after.Regardless of the many claims of groups today, the territorial boundaries were set in law. Thefact that the time in which all this took place was one of upheaval, bitter resentment, claimsgalore from all sides; it was incorporated into the present United States and is theinternationally-recognized border. Therefore, it is to be protected, just as Oregon, orMassachusetts, or Maine, or any other state, each with all their claims of original ownership by some groups, especially the indigent peoples of the early days.It is now time to enforce the rule of law, not to kowtow to special interest groups or claims by open-border believers and La Raza.
4
The fact is, the Citizens of the USA are in danger and are being killed because the border states of Mexico are controlled by thugs. Once again, theentire area is festooned with upheaval, violence, and lawlessness as it was in 1846. Thenorthern states in Mexico
5
: Baja California Norte, Sonora, Chihuahua, Coahuila, NuevoLeon, and Tamaulipas, are under rogue control, and the Mexican police cannot control them.Therefore, it is in the national interest of the United States to invade and restore order because of this clear and present danger to US Citizens and our economy.If our federal government will not execute an operational plan to secure our southern borders, then the States and the people must do it. However, let me provide an executableplan of operations for the federal government to undertake with resolve and commitment toprotect and secure the American people.I do not have to take the time in this article to explain to the readers the threat and theproblems on and across our southern borders of California, New Mexico, Arizona and Texas,as it is on the news every day. You would have to live in a perpetual and virtual cave not toknow the situation. We have a war of gigantic proportions…illegal invasions, treacherous drugcartels, gangs, human trafficking, drugs (is there not a war on drugs???), smuggling,kidnappings, and corruption of officials on both sides of the borders. Now if I were theCommander-in-Chief, I would be on a war-footing and I would have my military commandersplanning and executing a strategy that will defeat swiftly and decisively these cancerousenemies.The plan is basic and advanced unconventional/conventional war planning. This combinesthe best use of our forces that will encompass intelligence, targeting, and structuralorganization to accomplish the mission, base operations, offensive and defensive operations.First, organize three (3) Border Task Force Groups (BTFGs) and position them in threeoperational bases: one in Texas, one in Arizona and one in Southern California. We haveexisting bases in those states that can be used. There is no requirement to create any new 
 
Paul Vallely – A Practical, Operational Plan to Secure the BordersPage 3 of 5
 bases. I will not name these existing bases because of operational security, but theDepartment of Defense can easily figure this out! The BTFGs will be organized based on jointtask forces of Special Ops, Army, Air Force and Navy. Selected units and personnel will berelocated and moved to these designated bases.There will be approximately 5,000 warriors assigned to each BTFG. The organization will becommanded by a Two-Star “Warrior,” and each of the three BTFGs will be commanded by Brigadier General. The mission for the Command will be to target and conduct offensive anddefensive operations on the Mexican side of the border. National Guard, Border Patrol, DEA,and local sheriffs’ units will conduct border security operations on the United States side of the border. This initiative does not violate any existing
Posse Comitatus l
aws.
The
Posse Comitatus Act 
is a United States federal law (18 U.S.C. § 1385) passed on June18, 1878, after the end of Reconstruction,
6
with the intention (in concert with theInsurrection Act of 1807)
7
of substantially limiting the powers of the federal government touse the military for law enforcement. The Act prohibits most members of the federaluniformed services
8
(today the Army, Navy, Air Force, and State National Guard forces when such are called into federal service) from exercising nominally state law enforcement,
9
police, or peace officer powers that maintain “law and order”
10
on non-federal property (states and their counties and municipal divisions) within the UnitedStates. The statute generally prohibits federal military personnel and units of the NationalGuard under federal authority from acting in a law enforcement capacity within the UnitedStates, except where expressly authorized by the Constitution or Congress. The Coast Guardis exempt from the Act.
The National Guard will be the asset of the State Governors to be used as required to augmentthe Active Force BTFGs operations on the US side of the border.
Remove the Departmentof Homeland Security from this action completely.
Maximum use must be made of our Special Operators, Delta Force, Special Forces, Seals, AFSpecial Ops, Rangers, Marine Recon and Special Ops Air Assets and augmented by ActiveForce regular Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force.The concerns and anxiety of Americans, particularly in the Border States, have grownsignificantly in the past year. Governor Jan Brewer has had to take extraordinary legislativeaction to help rectify the situation, and we applaud her and others in Arizona for theirinitiative and courage. Changes in law enforcement operations have forced smugglers of drugs and illegal aliens into ever more isolated areas, increasing the number of deaths and thelevel of violence to a point where even the most hardened enforcement officials are alarmed.The number of arrests made by Border Patrol agents is one of the few reliable measurementsof the rising influx. That number dropped right after 9/11, but it has since been climbing. Infact, the cost of protecting the nation’s borders has increased 58 percent since 9/11, but inthree of the four years since the attacks, the number of people nabbed by the Border Patrolstill increased. In the fiscal year that ended in September, the Border Patrol reported 1.19million arrests, compared with 932,000 in fiscal year 2003. The Pew Hispanic Centerestimates that the number of illegal immigrants in the United States has grown from 8.4million in 2000 to 15 million today.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->