You are on page 1of 1

Bruce Berkowitz

Fairholme Capital Management, L.L.C.


1001 Brickell Bay Drive, Suite 3112
Miami, Florida 33131
305-358-3000

April 27, 2010

Dear Bruce,

Naturally, I applaud your temperament over the last two years.

The below discussion will not at all be new and I am without doubt that you will certainly recog-
nize the issues of my concern. That said, you are yet to completely address the issue of size.

Insofar as my calculations are accurate, $10 billion is the point at which size really begins to con-
strain performance, the consequence of a rapidly decreasing universe of investments. With respect
to Fairholme, you must be thinking whether it makes sense to keep the fund open or otherwise to
close it to new investors.

If to keep the fund open, there must be clear evidence that in doing so, current investors will not
suffer as a consequence. That is, the rate and duration of compounding returns that you can rea-
sonably expect to earn while open to new investors must either be equal to or exceed the reasona-
bly expected returns of Fairholme as a fund closed to new investors. Prior to the asininities of the
last two years, size was an increasing concern, however the ensuing fiasco provided conditions
which made incremental (external) capital attractive to all Fairholme investors. You did address the
question of size during a conference call last year, and I believe you were completely correct in
your response, brief as it was. However, these conditions are not what they were a few months ago
and I dont know that a compelling argument can currently be made in favor of keeping the fund
open-unless you are expanding your operations to international markets, you intend to employ
future capital in the purchase of private businesses, or contributions are offset by distributions-
redemptions, but even under these circumstances it would be a difficult argument.

Sincerely,

Matthew C. Pauls

You might also like