Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword or section
Like this

Table Of Contents

0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Equity Trading in the 21st Century

Equity Trading in the 21st Century

Ratings: (0)|Views: 228 |Likes:
Published by TradersNarrative

More info:

Published by: TradersNarrative on Jun 21, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Equity Trading in the 21
February 23, 2010
James J. Angel
Associate ProfessorMcDonough School of BusinessGeorgetown University
Lawrence E. Harris
Fred V. Keenan Chair in FinanceProfessor of Finance and Business EconomicsMarshall School of BusinessUniversity of Southern California
Chester S. Spatt
Pamela R. and Kenneth B. Dunn Professor of FinanceDirector, Center for Financial MarketsTepper School of BusinessCarnegie Mellon University
Trading in financial markets changed substantially with the growth of new informationprocessing and communications technologies over the last 25 years. Electronic technologiesprofoundly altered how exchanges, brokers, and dealers arrange most trades. In some cases,innovative trading systems are so different from traditional ones that many political leaders andregulators do not fully appreciate how they work and the many benefits that they offer toinvestors and to the economy as a whole.In the face of incomplete knowledge about this evolving environment, some policymakers nowquestion whether these innovations are in the public interest. Technical jargon such as “dark liquidity pools,” “hidden orders,” “flickering quotes,” and “flash orders” appear ominous to thosenot familiar with the objects being described. While professional traders measure systemperformance in milliseconds, others wonder what possible difference seconds—much lessmilliseconds—could have on capital formation within our economy. The ubiquitous role of computers in trading systems makes many people nervous, and especially those who rememberthe 1987 Stock Market Crash and how the failure of exchange trading systems exacerbatedproblems caused by traders following computer-generated trading strategies. Strikingly, themechanics of the equity markets functioned very well during the financial crisis, despite thewidespread use of computerized trading. Indeed, much of the focus of computerized tradingduring the financial crisis has been on offering liquidity (“market-making”) and shifting liquidity(“arbitrage”) rather than as in 1987 in consuming the market’s liquidity (“portfolio insurance”).This paper discusses recent innovations in trading systems and their effects on the markets.Using non-technical language, we show that investor demands for better solutions to the tradingproblems that they have traditionally faced —and will always face—largely drove theinnovations. The introduction of computerized trading systems and high-speed communicationsnetworks allowed exchanges, brokers, and dealers to better serve and attract clients. With theseinnovations, transaction costs dropped substantially over the years, and the market structurechanged dramatically.The winners first and foremost have been the investors who now obtain better service at a lowercost from financial intermediaries than previously. Secondary winners have been the exchanges,brokers, and dealers who embraced electronic trading technologies and whose skills allowed themto profitably implement them. The big losers have been those intermediaries who did notinnovate as successfully, and, as a consequence, became less competitive, and ultimately lessrelevant.Not all developments in financial market trading have been in the public interest. We identifyseveral problems that regulators should consider addressing to ensure that our markets continue toserve well both investors and the corporations that use them for raising capital. For example,systemic risks can arise because poorly capitalized broker-dealers allow electronic traders to
To better inform parties interested in understanding innovations in market structures, Knight Capital Group, Inc.commissioned the authors to write a paper describing new market structures and the resulting effects on the markets.This article presents our analyses and opinions only and does not necessarily represent the opinions of the sponsor of this project. The authors retained full editorial control over the content and conclusions of this report.
access the market in their name with insufficient real-time risk management controls on theirtrading. While exchanges and clearinghouses can alleviate this problem by better regulating theirmembers, we support the recent SEC rule proposal on this issue. Front-running across marketsalso concerns us. To some extent, well-informed traders or their agents can control this problemthrough careful transaction cost analyses, but the SEC and CFTC should write and enforce newregulations that prevent agents from front-running client orders in correlated instruments.Finally, transparency and fairness problems arise when trading systems employing make-or-takepricing schemes compete against exchanges that charge traditional transaction fees and againstdealers who cannot charge access fees. The SEC could solve this problem with a simplemodification to Regulation NMS.While the markets could potentially benefit from some specific regulatory changes, regulatorsmust be sensitive to the “unintended consequences” of poorly considered responses to concernsnow being raised about recent changes in the trading environment, many of which are notuniversally understood. Technological innovations have led to the emergence of electronicliquidity suppliers who have outcompeted— and thus supplanted—most traditional dealers bylowering the costs of trading to investors. If poorly conceived regulations were to handicapelectronic liquidity providers, a significant degradation in market quality would be the likelyunintended consequence.An executive summary of our report appears in the next section. The following section providesempirical evidence of how markets have changed in recent years, and in particular, how they havebecome more liquid over time. We then discuss the main trading problems that traders mustsolve and how traders traditionally solved those problems. We next discuss several of theinnovative systems that exchanges, brokers, and dealers have created to help investors addressthese problems, and we explain how they benefit the economy. We then offer brief commentsabout the market’s performance during the financial crisis and contrast the equity markets withother market structures. We conclude by discussing concerns about specific aspects of electronictrading.

Activity (29)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
Raghu Nayak liked this
Raghu Nayak liked this
The_Understudy_ liked this
rashmi syra liked this
aravind_holla liked this
alandab liked this
marketbee liked this
ABSAFO liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->