Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NOVEMber 2008
Newsletter of the
Berkeley Branch,
Write Angles
November Meeting:
Saturday, November 15, 2008, from 10 a.m. until noon.
Jack London Square, Oakland.
Inside Barnes & Noble Book Store at the Event Loft.
* * * * * * *
On October 19, along with fourteen delegates from other branches, I attended the quarterly meeting of
the Central board of the California Writers Club.
Attendance is an opportunity for me to learn what goes on at the state level, to learn how other branches
operate, and to come to know the best and brightest club members across the state: successful professionals and
serious hobbyists, generous every one.
This meeting dealt with a number of subjects, including projects related to the Centennial, guidelines for
the formation of a new Branch, implementation of an online forum for the Central Board (possibly reducing the
number of physical meetings).
Co-publishing emerged as the most exciting topic. The Sonoma Branch has been co-publishing with
Unlimited Publishing for three years. They have produced an annual anthology as well as three books by
member authors. Although there was discussion of the CWC entering into a multibook deal with a publisher, a
straw vote of the Central Board heavily favored leaving control at the branch level.
And a final word. Statewide, the CWC has sustained a significant attrition in its membership, down to
slightly under 1000 from the 1200 at the end of last year. I dont know if this is a typical annual fluctuation from
all memberships expiring in June though new members are added all year long, or if this is still one more
casualty of our several national uncertainties. Only two branches showed a small increaseSouth Bay, the
largest branch, is up to 191 members from last years 186; and Berkeley, up to 67 from the 65 we closed last year
with. I can only think there is a special dynamism at work in the Berkeley Branch helping us to buck the
statewide trend, the dynamism we need to continue to nourish. Membership numbers are simply a way of
keeping score.
* * * * * * *
Although I have not specifically mentioned it before, I am always open to membership feedback
suggestions for what youd like to see, especially from people who are willing to help implement innovative
ideas.
The View from the Helm is all clear ahead, visibility unlimited, and were calling for more steam from
the engine room.
- AL Levenson, President
Caroline Ahlswede and her niece, Cynthia Haney, were awarded Honorable Mention for their
September 2008
submission to the Feature Article category of the 77th Annual Writers Digest Writing Competition. The article,
Classroom Demons? Maybe Not, was one of over 17,000 submissions to the 10 contest categories. Maria
Schneider, editor of Writers Digest, wrote in a letter to Caroline, Your success in the face of such formidable
competition speaks highly of your writing talent and should be a source of great pride as you continue in your
writing career. Caroline appreciates the support of Lucille Bellucci, copyeditor Anne Fox, and the late Ione
Kramer, for helping to bring about the success for her and her niece of this first-time contest entry.
An e-mail message Lucille Bellucci recently received said, Good news! Were publishing your piece
in our Winter 2008 issuealthough I dont know the exact date of publication. The I is Jane Lancellotti,
Readers Narratives Editor of Narrative magazine, (narrativemagazine.com). This exciting online magazine
will feature Lucilles picture as well as her story, Shanghai, February 1952. Be on the lookout. And check out
the Web site yourself to see its possibilities for you.
Berkeley Branch Publicity Chair Linda Brown is now reporting on the activities of the Oakland
Metropolitan Chamber of Commerces Economic Development Committee. Two articles she wrote appeared
in the Oakland Business Review, which reaches 15,000 elected officials, business leaders, and other VIPs in the
East Bay and beyond each month.
IN MEMORIAM: In May of this year we suffered the loss of Ione Dorothy Kramer, a longtime
contributing member of the CWC Berkeley Branch. After her marriage, she and her husband, Gentom Wang
moved to China, where for some 30 years Ione worked for China Reconstructs, an English language
magazine, while her husband taught electronics in Tsinghua University. Once back in the United States, Ione
and colleague Kit Chow wrote All the Tea in China, which is still in print. Ione was not able to fulfill her desire
to write stories based on events and letters she had written during the turbulent years in China.
Attention, Members: Remember, your successes inspire your fellow members. Let us know what
youve done, what you are doing, what you plan to do. Has your article or short story been published? Has an
agent signed you on? Has a publisher accepted your book? Are you scheduled as a speaker, being interviewed,
presenting at a writers conference? Teaching a writing course? Send the good news to Anne Fox,
writefox@aol.com.
In the course of a month, my job as Berkeley Branch Prez, Interim Membership Guy,
and enthusiastic participant in both Berkeley Branch support/critique writers groups, I
must get to talk to as many members as anyone. I know that at least a half-dozen of us are
writing short pieces, stories and articles. Dozens of our members have book-length projects
underway. Many of them sometimes take a breather to dash off something short.
So, I wonder why Duotrope (www.duotrope.com) isnt mentionedSeptember
more often2008
within
the Berkeley Branch.
For those of us writing shorter than book-length pieces, Duotrope is one of our best
friends. Duotrope is a free (donation-supported), easy-to-use Web site that has two
valuable features: a searchable database of 2,300 publications and a submission tracker.
Feature number one, the database, includes both print and electronic publications. wYou get to fill out a
multifield search form. Enter genre (choose from 15), length (choose from four), and pay scale (choose from four).
You can also specify print or electronic media and print or electronic submission.
Ask for a mainstream publication, print or electronic, that pays top-end (a nickel a word or more) and allows
electronic submissions, excluding markets that are temporarily closed, and 24 hits come up plus two that list their
genre as other. Click on any single result, and you find yourself at a page of response statistics for that publication
maintained by the readers of Duotrope. And, of course, a link to that publications Web site, submission guidelines, a
copy of the current number, subscription information, and the tooting of their entire horn section.
Try experimental, flash fiction, electronic, token payment and up, and you get 15 direct hits and 27 more
secondary matches. It would take at least an hour in a print publication to do that research.
Feature number two, the submission tracker, is awesome in its own right. Click on the tracker, and you get to
look at the status of everything youve ever submitted, filtered and sorted according to eight categories you specify.
Or click the add submission button and enter the data for the manuscript you are sending today. Enter the
publication and the date sent. If/when you receive an acknowledgment, acceptance, rejection, request for rewrite,
enter these as a report. Your personal file is updated, response times are added to the statistics database, and the
diligence of every publication is posted for all.
Is that computers and the Internet at their best, or what?
- AL Levenson
Are you are a member of a private, closed support/critique group? Or do you drop in
on a group that is open to the public like the ones sponsored by the Berkeley Branch? What is
your contract with the group?
Some writers attend regularly, leaving their own work at home, bringing only their best
editorial eyeglasses. They offer quality opinions in exchange for some credit to be redeemed
in the future. They give a lot, and it comes back to thank them.
Others submit the best they have, the polished version several drafts beyond the first.
They offer it with prideand trepidationexpecting the flaws hiding in their pages to be
flushed out like a politicians peccadillos. These writers, too, give their best and come away
with the best.
The person who gets the least is the person who has dashed off a first draft and, with the minimum scrutiny,
brings the piece in the hope that their raw talent will be a ticket to the circus. They tell themselves they dont know
if their work is any good, but they bring it in the belief that their group will prescribe the surgery necessary to fix it.
Fugedaboudit. Doesnt happen.
Bring a first draft, and the best editors at the table will spend most of their allotted time correcting
punctuation. The second-best editors, lesser grammarians like myself, ignore the commas and the spelling errors
with the sure knowledge the typos and squiggles will not pass the fine sieve of the best and the brightest. We
second-stringers read for substance and content and get bogged down in incomplete scene setting, incomplete
context, shifts in point of view, unclear antecedents, and lots more. Too much to write up on your manuscript.
The most useful critiques I ever received came when I brought my best to the party. When your peer editors
are not distracted by first-draft mistakes, you get the suggestions about structure, dialogue flow, credibility of
character, symbolism, pace, etc. That is what I come for.
A good group will deliver more than their share of the contract if you live up to your half.
- AL Levenson
CO-publishing
The discussion of co-publishing at the Central Board meeting stimulated further thinking.
In this period of flux and flex in publishing formats, we see that individuals can become publishers.
From there it is a small step to imagine the Berkeley Branch with its own imprint.
In our branch at least two books have been self-published within the last year. I know of at least five books
shopping for an agent. As frustrations mount, I imagine many writers will begin to consider a
self-publishing route. It seems to me these folks ought to get together to pool their knowledge and
examine their collective options.
How many individuals within the branch would like to gather with others and consolidate their ideas
and experience, consider options, and explore possibilities? Would anyone care to host a discussion? Drop me a
note at Calwritersclub@GMail.com with your thoughts.
- AL Levenson
spread the word about CWC, please contact Linda number in a header on each page except the title page.
Brown at BrownCalifornia@aol.com. Give them your best by November 16.
20, respectively.
The CALIFORNIA WRITERS CLUB is dedicated to educating members and the public-at-large in the craft of writing and in the marketing of their
work. For more information, visit our Web site at www.berkeleywritersclub.org.
Copyright 2008 by the California Writers Club, Berkeley Branch. All rights reserved. Write Angles is published 10 times a year (September -
June) by the California Writers Club, Berkeley Branch on behalf of its members. CWC assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy,
completeness, or usefulness of any information, process, product, method or policy described in this newsletter.